This change allow the driver to be used with ACPI PRP0001 and removes
an antipattern that I want to avoid being copied into new IIO drivers.
The handling of match_data uses a different approach as
device_get_match_data doesn't distinguish between no match, and
a match but with NULL data.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Brauchli <andreas.brauchli@sensirion.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-28-jic23@kernel.org
This cleans up the code at bit, but is primarily here as a precusor
to the next patch. I've only done this for the two functions
which use the dev pointer repeatedly.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Brauchli <andreas.brauchli@sensirion.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-27-jic23@kernel.org
of_match_ptr() prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and is
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop from this driver and use generic fw accessors to check
if there is a fw_node and get the id.
It might be neater to use pointers rather than indexes for
the device_data but that is another issue and should be handled
separately.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-26-jic23@kernel.org
This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and is
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-25-jic23@kernel.org
This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and is
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-24-jic23@kernel.org
This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and is
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannanece23@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-23-jic23@kernel.org
This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and is
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Ludovic Tancerel <ludovic.tancerel@maplehightech.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-22-jic23@kernel.org
This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and is
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Gregor Boirie <gregor.boirie@parrot.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-21-jic23@kernel.org
This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and is
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Ludovic Tancerel <ludovic.tancerel@maplehightech.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-20-jic23@kernel.org
These prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-19-jic23@kernel.org
These prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@invensense.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-18-jic23@kernel.org
This change allows use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and removes
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-17-jic23@kernel.org
These prevent the use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Sean Nyekjaer <sean.nyekjaer@prevas.dk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-16-jic23@kernel.org
These prevent the use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-15-jic23@kernel.org
This enables use of ACPI PRP0001 and removes an antipattern I am
trying to stop people copying in IIO.
This particular case is more complex than most because it allowed
probing via sysfs with out a fwnode but would presumably always
have then failed. Now the code will assume that properties are
the defaults if not specified or the firmware node is not present.
This relaxation of the constraints should not break any existing
cases and may enable some new ones.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-14-jic23@kernel.org
This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Also add mod_devicetable.h include given struct of_device_id is
declared there.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-13-jic23@kernel.org
These result in a very small reduction in driver size, but at the
cost of more complex build and slightly harder to read code.
In the case of of_match_ptr it also prevents use of PRP0001
ACPI based identification. In this particular case we have
a valid ACPI/PNP ID that I am assuming was issued by Analog
Devices. That should be used in preference to PRP0001 but doesn't
mean we should prevent that route.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-12-jic23@kernel.org
These result in a very small reduction in driver size, but at the
cost of more complex build and slightly harder to read code.
In the case of of_match_ptr it also prevents use of PRP0001
ACPI based identification. In this particular case we have
a valid ACPI/PNP ID that I am assuming was issued by Analog
Devices. That should be used in preference to PRP0001 but doesn't
mean we should prevent that route.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-11-jic23@kernel.org
These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-10-jic23@kernel.org
These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.
Also switch to device_get_match_data() from of_ variant and adjust
headers to reflect the change.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-9-jic23@kernel.org
This change allows the use of the driver with ACPI via PRP0001
and remove an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Also adjust includes to reflect this change.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-8-jic23@kernel.org
These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Also use device_get_match_data() rather than devicetree only version.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-7-jic23@kernel.org
Given that an ACPI binding must start with 3 or 4 capitals,
this cannot represent a valid binding.
It seems unlikely anything out there is using it.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Maury Anderson <maury.anderson@rockwellcollins.com>
Cc: Matthew Weber <matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com>
Cc: Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-6-jic23@kernel.org
These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Whilst this driver has an ACPI binding, it is not of a form
that is valid under ACPI so will be dropped shortly.
Also switch to device_get_match_data() and switch headers.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Maury Anderson <maury.anderson@rockwellcollins.com>
Cc: Matthew Weber <matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com>
Cc: Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-5-jic23@kernel.org
These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Drop them to remove this restriction.
Also switch headers to reflect this change.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-4-jic23@kernel.org
Commit 73f3816609 ("arm64: Advertise mitigation of Spectre-v2, or lack
thereof") changed the way we deal with ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, by moving most
of the enabling code to the .matches() callback.
This has the unfortunate effect that the workaround gets only enabled on
the first affected CPU, and no other.
In order to address this, forcefully call the .matches() callback from a
.cpu_enable() callback, which brings us back to the original behaviour.
Fixes: 73f3816609 ("arm64: Advertise mitigation of Spectre-v2, or lack thereof")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
We seem to be pretending that we don't have any firmware mitigation
when KVM is not compiled in, which is not quite expected.
Bring back the mitigation in this case.
Fixes: 4db61fef16 ("arm64: kvm: Modernize __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start annotations")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
In a follow-up patch, we may save the FPSIMD rather than the full SVE
state when the state has to be zeroed on return to userspace (e.g
during a syscall).
Introduce an helper to load SVE vectors from FPSIMD state and zero the rest
of SVE registers.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200828181155.17745-7-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Introduce a new helper that will zero all SVE registers but the first
128-bits of each vector. This will be used by subsequent patches to
avoid costly store/maipulate/reload sequences in places like do_sve_acc().
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200828181155.17745-6-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The current version of the macro "for" is not able to work when the
counter is used to generate registers using mnemonics. This is because
gas is not able to evaluate the expression generated if used in
register's name (i.e x\n).
Gas offers a way to evaluate macro arguments by using % in front of
them under the alternate macro mode.
The implementation of "for" is updated to use the alternate macro mode
and %, so we can use the macro in more cases. As the alternate macro
mode may have side-effects, this is disabled when expanding the body.
While it is enough to prefix the argument of the macro "__for_body"
with %, the arguments of "__for" are also prefixed to get a more
bearable value in case of compilation error.
Suggested-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200828181155.17745-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
A follow-up patch will need to update ZCR_EL1.LEN.
Add a macro that could be re-used in the current and new places to
avoid code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200828181155.17745-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The SVE state is saved by fpsimd_signal_preserve_current_state() and not
preserve_fpsimd_context(). Update the comment in preserve_sve_context to
reflect the current behavior.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200828181155.17745-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
fpsimd_restore_current_state() enables and disables the SVE access trap
based on TIF_SVE, not task_fpsimd_load(). Update the documentation of
do_sve_acc to reflect this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200828181155.17745-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The watchdog driver for MT8183 relies on DT data, so the fallback
compatible MT6589 won't work, need to update watchdog device node
to sync with watchdog dt-binding document.
Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@mediatek.com>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
sg_init_table zeroes its first argument, so the allocation of that argument
doesn't have to.
the semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x,n,flags;
@@
x =
- kcalloc
+ kmalloc_array
(n,sizeof(*x),flags)
...
sg_init_table(x,n)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1600601186-7420-12-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The following sequence of commands,
mkfs.xfs -f -m reflink=0 -r rtdev=/dev/loop1,size=10M /dev/loop0
mount -o rtdev=/dev/loop1 /dev/loop0 /mnt
xfs_growfs /mnt
... causes the following call trace to be printed on the console,
XFS: Assertion failed: (bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE) || (xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) > XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF && xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) < XFS_BLFT_MAX_BUF), file: fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c, line: 331
Call Trace:
xfs_buf_item_format+0x632/0x680
? kmem_alloc_large+0x29/0x90
? kmem_alloc+0x70/0x120
? xfs_log_commit_cil+0x132/0x940
xfs_log_commit_cil+0x26f/0x940
? xfs_buf_item_init+0x1ad/0x240
? xfs_growfs_rt_alloc+0x1fc/0x280
__xfs_trans_commit+0xac/0x370
xfs_growfs_rt_alloc+0x1fc/0x280
xfs_growfs_rt+0x1a0/0x5e0
xfs_file_ioctl+0x3fd/0xc70
? selinux_file_ioctl+0x174/0x220
ksys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x3e/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
This occurs because the buffer being formatted has the value of
XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF assigned to the 'type' subfield of
bip->bli_formats->blf_flags.
This commit fixes the issue by assigning one of XFS_BLFT_RTSUMMARY_BUF
and XFS_BLFT_RTBITMAP_BUF to the 'type' subfield of
bip->bli_formats->blf_flags before committing the corresponding
transaction.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
The inode extent truncate path unmaps extents from the inode block
mapping, finishes deferred ops to free the associated extents and
then explicitly rolls the transaction before processing the next
extent. The latter extent roll is spurious as xfs_defer_finish()
always returns a clean transaction and automatically relogs inodes
attached to the transaction (with lock_flags == 0). This can
unnecessarily increase the number of log ticket regrants that occur
during a long running truncate operation. Remove the explicit
transaction roll.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Add the TAS2564 as a supported amplifier. This amplifier is register,
bitmap and feature compatible to the TAS2562.
Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200918150130.21015-2-dmurphy@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
On i.MX platforms PM is not managed via ACPI although CONFIG_ACPI
can be set. So, in order to correctly set the system target state
we introduce a flag for platforms that require to use acpi target
states.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200921105038.2909899-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
In commit 783898ce68 ("ASoC: SOF: append extended data to
sof_ipc_comp_process") the process components are set to run on the
fixed core 0, this break us from scheduling components on any other DSP
core.
Since we can get the DSP core index from swidget->core, it is duplicated
to pass the extra 'core' argument for those sof_widget_load_xx()
functions.
Here removes the duplicate 'core' argument and get component core from
swidget->core directly to fix the issue mentioned above.
Fixes: 783898ce68 ("ASoC: SOF: append extended data to sof_ipc_comp_process")
Signed-off-by: Keyon Jie <yang.jie@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaska Uimonen <jaska.uimonen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200921104544.2897112-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Some platforms have bogus _CST which might cause unexpectd behavior
in the CPU idle driver. Some bogus _CST might be unable to be
disassembled by acpica-tools due to broken format.
Print extra log if the _CST extraction/verification failes.
This can be used to help narrow down why the CPU idle driver fails
to behave as expected.
Suggested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
sg_init_table zeroes its first argument, so the allocation of that argument
doesn't have to.
the semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x,n,flags;
@@
x =
- kcalloc
+ kmalloc_array
(n,sizeof(*x),flags)
...
sg_init_table(x,n)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
A mirror index is always of type u32.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Checking for a nonzero dma_pfn_offset was a quick shortcut to validate
whether the DMA == phys assumption could hold at all. Checking for a
non-NULL dma_range_map is not quite equivalent, since a map may be
present to describe a limited DMA window even without an offset, and
thus this check can now yield false positives.
However, it only ever served to short-circuit going all the way through
to __arm_lpae_alloc_pages(), failing the canonical test there, and
having a bit more to clean up. As such, we can simply remove it without
loss of correctness.
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
