Rescue the GT workarounds from being buried inside init_clock_gating so
that we remember to apply them after a GT reset, and that they are
included in our verification that the workarounds are applied.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611080140.30228-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit c3b93a943f)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Rescue the GT workarounds from being buried inside init_clock_gating so
that we remember to apply them after a GT reset, and that they are
included in our verification that the workarounds are applied.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611080140.30228-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 7331c356b6)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Rescue the GT workarounds from being buried inside init_clock_gating so
that we remember to apply them after a GT reset, and that they are
included in our verification that the workarounds are applied.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611080140.30228-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 19f1f627b3)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Rescue the GT workarounds from being buried inside init_clock_gating so
that we remember to apply them after a GT reset, and that they are
included in our verification that the workarounds are applied.
v2: Leave HSW_SCRATCH to set an explicit value, not or in our disable
bit.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2011
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611093015.11370-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit f93ec5fb56)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
According to BSpec the Data Island Packet should be disabled after
disabling the transcoder, but before the transcoder clock select is set
to none. On an ICL RVP, daisy-chained MST config not following this
leads to a hang with the following MCE when disabling the output:
[ 870.948739] mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 5 Bank 6: ba00000011000402
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: RIP !INEXACT! 10:<ffffffff81aca652> {poll_idle+0x92/0xb0}
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: TSC 135a261fe61
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:706e5 TIME 1591739604 SOCKET 0 APIC 0 microcode 20
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: Run the above through 'mcelog --ascii'
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check: Processor context corrupt
[ 871.019212] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal machine check
[ 871.019212] Kernel Offset: disabled
Bspec: 4287
Fixes: fa37a21327 ("drm/i915: Stop sending DP SDPs on ddi disable")
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200609220616.6015-1-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit c980216dd2)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
In commit 5ba32c7be8 ("drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context
reload when rewinding RING_TAIL"), we placed the check for rewinding a
context on actually submitting the next request in that context. This
was so that we only had to check once, and could do so with precision
avoiding as many forced restores as possible. For example, to ensure
that we can resubmit the same request a couple of times, we include a
small wa_tail such that on the next submission, the ring->tail will
appear to move forwards when resubmitting the same request. This is very
common as it will happen for every lite-restore to fill the second port
after a context switch.
However, intel_ring_direction() is limited in precision to movements of
upto half the ring size. The consequence being that if we tried to
unwind many requests, we could exceed half the ring and flip the sense
of the direction, so missing a force restore. As no request can be
greater than half the ring (i.e. 2048 bytes in the smallest case), we
can check for rollback incrementally. As we check against the tail that
would be submitted, we do not lose any sensitivity and allow lite
restores for the simple case. We still need to double check upon
submitting the context, to allow for multiple preemptions and
resubmissions.
Fixes: 5ba32c7be8 ("drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Reviewed-by: Bruce Chang <yu.bruce.chang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200609151723.12971-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit e36ba817fa)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
We have a I915_REQUEST_NOPREEMPT flag that we set when we must prevent
the HW from preempting during the course of this request. We need to
honour this flag and protect the HW even if we have a heartbeat request,
or other maximum priority barrier, pending. As such, restrict the
timeslicing check to avoid preempting into the topmost priority band,
leaving the unpreemptable requests in blissful peace running
uninterrupted on the HW.
v2: Set the I915_PRIORITY_BARRIER to be less than
I915_PRIORITY_UNPREEMPTABLE so that we never submit a request
(heartbeat or barrier) that can legitimately preempt the current
non-premptable request.
Fixes: 2a98f4e65b ("drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption on a request")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200527162418.24755-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit b72f02d78e)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Since we temporarily disable the heartbeat and restore back to the
default value, we can use the stored defaults on the engine and avoid
using a local.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519063123.20673-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 3a230a554d)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
This patch causes pcs_parse_pinconf() to return -ENOTSUPP when no
pinctrl_map is added. The current behavior is to return 0 when
!PCS_HAS_PINCONF or !nconfs. Thus pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry()
incorrectly assumes that a map was added and sets num_maps = 2.
Analysis:
=========
The function pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry() calls pcs_parse_pinconf()
if PCS_HAS_PINCONF is enabled. The function pcs_parse_pinconf()
returns 0 to indicate there was no error and num_maps is then set to 2:
980 static int pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry(struct pcs_device *pcs,
981 struct device_node *np,
982 struct pinctrl_map **map,
983 unsigned *num_maps,
984 const char **pgnames)
985 {
<snip>
1053 (*map)->type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP;
1054 (*map)->data.mux.group = np->name;
1055 (*map)->data.mux.function = np->name;
1056
1057 if (PCS_HAS_PINCONF && function) {
1058 res = pcs_parse_pinconf(pcs, np, function, map);
1059 if (res)
1060 goto free_pingroups;
1061 *num_maps = 2;
1062 } else {
1063 *num_maps = 1;
1064 }
However, pcs_parse_pinconf() will also return 0 if !PCS_HAS_PINCONF or
!nconfs. I believe these conditions should indicate that no map was
added by returning -ENOTSUPP. Otherwise pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry()
will set num_maps = 2 even though no maps were successfully added, as
it does not reach "m++" on line 940:
895 static int pcs_parse_pinconf(struct pcs_device *pcs, struct device_node *np,
896 struct pcs_function *func,
897 struct pinctrl_map **map)
898
899 {
900 struct pinctrl_map *m = *map;
<snip>
917 /* If pinconf isn't supported, don't parse properties in below. */
918 if (!PCS_HAS_PINCONF)
919 return 0;
920
921 /* cacluate how much properties are supported in current node */
922 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop2); i++) {
923 if (of_find_property(np, prop2[i].name, NULL))
924 nconfs++;
925 }
926 for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(prop4); i++) {
927 if (of_find_property(np, prop4[i].name, NULL))
928 nconfs++;
929 }
930 if (!nconfs)
919 return 0;
932
933 func->conf = devm_kcalloc(pcs->dev,
934 nconfs, sizeof(struct pcs_conf_vals),
935 GFP_KERNEL);
936 if (!func->conf)
937 return -ENOMEM;
938 func->nconfs = nconfs;
939 conf = &(func->conf[0]);
940 m++;
This situtation will cause a boot failure [0] on the BeagleBone Black
(AM3358) when am33xx_pinmux node in arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx-l4.dtsi
has compatible = "pinconf-single" instead of "pinctrl-single".
The patch fixes this issue by returning -ENOSUPP when !PCS_HAS_PINCONF
or !nconfs, so that pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry() will know that no
map was added.
Logic is also added to pcs_parse_one_pinctrl_entry() to distinguish
between -ENOSUPP and other errors. In the case of -ENOSUPP, num_maps
is set to 1 as it is valid for pinconf to be enabled and a given pin
group to not any pinconf properties.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-omap/20200529175544.GA3766151@x1/
Fixes: 9dddb4df90 ("pinctrl: single: support generic pinconf")
Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <drew@beagleboard.org>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200608125143.GA2789203@x1
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Add the FRE/FWE pins for the JZ4740.
These pins must be in function #0 for the NAND to work. The reason it
worked before was because the bootloader did set these pins to the
correct function beforehand.
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200607174243.2361664-1-paul@crapouillou.net
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08_spi.c:129:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used
Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/ptr_ret.cocci
Fixes: 0f04a81784 ("pinctrl: mcp23s08: Split to three parts: core, I²C, SPI")
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
CC: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200608010253.GA79576@44f7ab9e8d59
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Use noirq suspend/resume callbacks as other drivers which implement
noirq suspend/resume callbacks (Ex:- PCIe) depend on pinctrl driver to
configure the signals used by their respective devices in the noirq phase.
Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200604174935.26560-1-vidyas@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Fix the following warnings caused by reusage of the same irq_chip
instance for all spmi-gpio gpio_irq_chip instances. Instead embed
irq_chip into pmic_gpio_state struct.
gpio gpiochip2: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@2:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.
gpio gpiochip3: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@4:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.
gpio gpiochip4: (c440000.qcom,spmi:pmic@a:gpio@c000): detected irqchip that is shared with multiple gpiochips: please fix the driver.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200604002817.667160-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
It is expected that the returned counters by .get_survey are monotonic
increasing. But the data from ath10k gets reset to zero regularly. Channel
active/busy time are then showing incorrect values (less than previous or
sometimes zero) for the currently active channel during successive survey
dump commands.
example:
$ iw dev wlan0 survey dump
Survey data from wlan0
frequency: 5180 MHz [in use]
channel active time: 54995 ms
channel busy time: 432 ms
channel receive time: 0 ms
channel transmit time: 59 ms
...
$ iw dev wlan0 survey dump
Survey data from wlan0
frequency: 5180 MHz [in use]
channel active time: 32592 ms
channel busy time: 254 ms
channel receive time: 0 ms
channel transmit time: 0 ms
...
The correct way to handle this is to use the non-clearing
WMI_BSS_SURVEY_REQ_TYPE_READ wmi_bss_survey_req_type. The firmware will
then accumulate the survey data and handle wrap arounds.
Tested-on: QCA9984 hw1.0 10.4-3.5.3-00057
Tested-on: QCA988X hw2.0 10.2.4-1.0-00047
Tested-on: QCA9888 hw2.0 10.4-3.9.0.2-00024
Tested-on: QCA4019 hw1.0 10.4-3.6-00140
Fixes: fa7937e3d5 ("ath10k: update bss channel survey information")
Signed-off-by: Venkateswara Naralasetty <vnaralas@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Markus Theil <markus.theil@tu-ilmenau.de>
Tested-by: John Deere <24601deerej@gmail.com>
[sven@narfation.org: adjust commit message]
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1592232686-28712-1-git-send-email-kvalo@codeaurora.org
When tx status enabled, retry count is updated from tx completion status.
which is not working as expected due to firmware limitation where
firmware can not provide per MSDU rate statistics from tx completion
status. Due to this tx retry count is always 0 in station dump.
Fix this issue by updating the retry packet count from per peer
statistics. This patch will not break on SDIO devices since, this retry
count is already updating from peer statistics for SDIO devices.
Tested-on: QCA9984 PCI 10.4-3.6-00104
Tested-on: QCA9882 PCI 10.2.4-1.0-00047
Signed-off-by: Venkateswara Naralasetty <vnaralas@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1591856446-26977-1-git-send-email-vnaralas@codeaurora.org
On wcn3990 we have "per_ce_irq = true". That makes the
ath10k_ce_interrupt_summary() function always return 0xfff. The
ath10k_ce_per_engine_service_any() function will see this and think
that _all_ copy engines have an interrupt. Without checking, the
ath10k_ce_per_engine_service() assumes that if it's called that the
"copy complete" (cc) interrupt fired. This combination seems bad.
Let's add a check to make sure that the "copy complete" interrupt
actually fired in ath10k_ce_per_engine_service().
This might fix a hard-to-reproduce failure where it appears that the
copy complete handlers run before the copy is really complete.
Specifically a symptom was that we were seeing this on a Qualcomm
sc7180 board:
arm-smmu 15000000.iommu: Unhandled context fault:
fsr=0x402, iova=0x7fdd45780, fsynr=0x30003, cbfrsynra=0xc1, cb=10
Even on platforms that don't have wcn3990 this still seems like it
would be a sane thing to do. Specifically the current IRQ handler
comments indicate that there might be other misc interrupt sources
firing that need to be cleared. If one of those sources was the one
that caused the IRQ handler to be called it would also be important to
double-check that the interrupt we cared about actually fired.
Tested-on: WCN3990 SNOC WLAN.HL.3.2.2-00490-QCAHLSWMTPL-1
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200609082015.1.Ife398994e5a0a6830e4d4a16306ef36e0144e7ba@changeid
Use kobj_to_dev() instead of container_of()
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The kernel uses internal mounts created by kern_mount() and populated
with files with no lookup path by alloc_file_pseudo() for a variety of
reasons. An example of such a mount is for anonymous pipes. For pipes,
every vfs_write() regardless of filesystem, calls fsnotify_modify()
to notify of any changes which incurs a small amount of overhead in
fsnotify even when there are no watchers. It can also trigger for reads
and readv and writev, it was simply vfs_write() that was noticed first.
A patch is pending that reduces, but does not eliminate, the overhead of
fsnotify but for files that cannot be looked up via a path, even that
small overhead is unnecessary. The user API for all notification
subsystems (inotify, fanotify, ...) is based on the pathname and a dirfd
and proc entries appear to be the only visible representation of the
files. Proc does not have the same pathname as the internal entry and
the proc inode is not the same as the internal inode so even if fanotify
is used on a file under /proc/XX/fd, no useful events are notified.
This patch changes alloc_file_pseudo() to always opt out of fsnotify by
setting FMODE_NONOTIFY flag so that no check is made for fsnotify
watchers on pseudo files. This should be safe as the underlying helper
for the dentry is d_alloc_pseudo() which explicitly states that no
lookups are ever performed meaning that fanotify should have nothing
useful to attach to.
The test motivating this was "perf bench sched messaging --pipe". On
a single-socket machine using threads the difference of the patch was
as follows.
5.7.0 5.7.0
vanilla nofsnotify-v1r1
Amean 1 1.3837 ( 0.00%) 1.3547 ( 2.10%)
Amean 3 3.7360 ( 0.00%) 3.6543 ( 2.19%)
Amean 5 5.8130 ( 0.00%) 5.7233 * 1.54%*
Amean 7 8.1490 ( 0.00%) 7.9730 * 2.16%*
Amean 12 14.6843 ( 0.00%) 14.1820 ( 3.42%)
Amean 18 21.8840 ( 0.00%) 21.7460 ( 0.63%)
Amean 24 28.8697 ( 0.00%) 29.1680 ( -1.03%)
Amean 30 36.0787 ( 0.00%) 35.2640 * 2.26%*
Amean 32 38.0527 ( 0.00%) 38.1223 ( -0.18%)
The difference is small but in some cases it's outside the noise so
while marginal, there is still some small benefit to ignoring fsnotify
for files allocated via alloc_file_pseudo() in some cases.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200615121358.GF3183@techsingularity.net
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
The old TEE mailing list tee-dev@lists.linaro.org is about to be
retired. From now on please use op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org
instead.
Acked-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Currently the PL330 is enabled by default. However if left in IDM reset, as is
the case with the Meraki and Synology NSP devices, the system will hang when
probing for the PL330's AMBA peripheral ID. We therefore should be able to
disable it in these cases.
The PL330 is also included among of the list of peripherals put into coherent
mode, so "dma-coherent" has been added here as well.
Fixes: 5fa1026a3e ("ARM: dts: NSP: Add PL330 support")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Hagan <mnhagan88@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
