Reduce read_annotate() runs by collapsing subsequent runs into a
single call.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241128094311.688871544@infradead.org
Avoid endless .discard.foo sections for each annotation, create a
single .discard.annotate_insn section that takes an annotation type along
with the instruction.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241128094310.932794537@infradead.org
At the point where find_active_uprobe_rcu() is used we know that VMA in
question has triggered software breakpoint, so we don't need to validate
vma->vm_flags. Keep only vma->vm_file NULL check.
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241122035922.3321100-2-andrii@kernel.org
Add helper functions to speculatively perform operations without
read-locking mmap_lock, expecting that mmap_lock will not be
write-locked and mm is not modified from under us.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241122174416.1367052-3-surenb@google.com
Convert mm_lock_seq to be seqcount_t and change all mmap_write_lock
variants to increment it, in-line with the usual seqcount usage pattern.
This lets us check whether the mmap_lock is write-locked by checking
mm_lock_seq.sequence counter (odd=locked, even=unlocked). This will be
used when implementing mmap_lock speculation functions.
As a result vm_lock_seq is also change to be unsigned to match the type
of mm_lock_seq.sequence.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241122174416.1367052-2-surenb@google.com
David pointed out that gup_fast() does exactly what the new
raw_seqcount_try_begin() does -- use it.
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Add raw_seqcount_try_begin() to opens a read critical section of the given
seqcount_t if the counter is even. This enables eliding the critical
section entirely if the counter is odd, instead of doing the speculation
knowing it will fail.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241122174416.1367052-1-surenb@google.com
Add a new "power_core" PMU and "energy-core" event for monitoring
energy consumption by each individual core. The existing energy-cores
event aggregates the energy consumption of CPU cores at the package level.
This new event aligns with the AMD's per-core energy counters.
Tested the package level and core level PMU counters with workloads
pinned to different CPUs.
Results with workload pinned to CPU 4 in core 4 on an AMD Zen4 Genoa
machine:
$ sudo perf stat --per-core -e power_core/energy-core/ -- taskset -c 4 stress-ng --matrix 1 --timeout 5s
stress-ng: info: [21250] setting to a 5 second run per stressor
stress-ng: info: [21250] dispatching hogs: 1 matrix
stress-ng: info: [21250] successful run completed in 5.00s
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
S0-D0-C0 1 0.00 Joules power_core/energy-core/
S0-D0-C1 1 0.00 Joules power_core/energy-core/
S0-D0-C2 1 0.00 Joules power_core/energy-core/
S0-D0-C3 1 0.00 Joules power_core/energy-core/
S0-D0-C4 1 8.43 Joules power_core/energy-core/
S0-D0-C5 1 0.00 Joules power_core/energy-core/
S0-D0-C6 1 0.00 Joules power_core/energy-core/
S0-D0-C7 1 0.00 Joules power_core/energy-core/
S0-D1-C8 1 0.00 Joules power_core/energy-core/
S0-D1-C9 1 0.00 Joules power_core/energy-core/
S0-D1-C10 1 0.00 Joules power_core/energy-core/
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115060805.447565-11-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com
Prepare for the addition of RAPL core energy counter support.
Move cntr_mask to rapl_pmus struct instead of adding a new global
cntr_mask for the new RAPL power_core PMU. This will also ensure that
the second "core_cntr_mask" is only created if needed (i.e. in case of
AMD CPUs).
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115060805.447565-10-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com
Prepare for the addition of RAPL core energy counter support.
After making the rapl_model struct global, the rapl_msrs global
variable isn't needed, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115060805.447565-9-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com
Prepare for the addition of RAPL core energy counter support.
Replace the generic names with *_pkg*, to later on differentiate between
the scopes of the two different PMUs and their variables.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115060805.447565-8-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com
Prepare for the addition of RAPL core energy counter support.
Add arguments to the init and cleanup functions, which will help in
initialization and cleaning up of two separate PMUs.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115060805.447565-7-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com
Prepare for the addition of RAPL core energy counter support.
As there will always be just one rapl_model variable on a system, make it
global, to make it easier to access it from any function.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115060805.447565-6-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com
Rename struct rapl_pmu variables from "pmu" to "rapl_pmu", to
avoid any confusion between the variables of two different
structs pmu and rapl_pmu. As rapl_pmu also contains a pointer to
struct pmu, which leads to situations in code like pmu->pmu,
which is needlessly confusing. Above scenario is replaced with
much more readable rapl_pmu->pmu with this change.
Also rename "pmus" member in rapl_pmus struct, for same reason.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115060805.447565-5-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com
Prepare for the addition of RAPL core energy counter support.
Post which, one CPU might be mapped to more than one rapl_pmu
(package/die one and a core one). So, remove the cpu_to_rapl_pmu()
function.
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115060805.447565-4-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com
On x86, topology_core_id() returns a unique core ID within the PKG
domain. Looking at match_smt() suggests that a core ID just needs to be
unique within a LLC domain. For use cases such as the core RAPL PMU,
there exists a need for a unique core ID across the entire system with
multiple PKG domains. Introduce topology_logical_core_id() to derive a
unique core ID across the system.
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115060805.447565-3-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com
commit 9e9af8bbb5 ("perf/x86/rapl: Clean up cpumask and hotplug")
removes the cpumask handling from rapl. Post that, we no longer need the
get_rapl_pmu_cpumask() function. So remove it.
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115060805.447565-2-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com
The current code may iterate all the PEBS records in the DS area several
times. The first loop is to find all active events and calculate the
available records for each event. Then iterate the whole buffer again
and again to process available records until all active events are
processed.
The algorithm is inherited from the old generations. The old PEBS
hardware does not deal well with the situation when events happen near
each other. SW has to drop the error records. Multiple iterations are
required.
The hardware limit has been addressed on newer platforms with adaptive
PEBS. A simple one-iteration algorithm is introduced.
The samples are output by record order with the patch, rather than the
event order. It doesn't impact the post-processing. The perf tool always
sorts the records by time before presenting them to the end user.
In an NMI, the last record has to be specially handled. Add a last[]
variable to track the last unprocessed record of each event.
Test:
11 PEBS events are used in the perf test. Only the basic information is
collected.
perf record -e instructions:up,...,instructions:up -c 2000003 benchmark
The ftrace is used to record the duration of the
intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl().
The average duration reduced from 62.04us to 57.94us.
A small improvement can be observed with the new algorithm.
Also, the implementation becomes simpler and more straightforward.
Suggested-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119135504.1463839-5-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Factor out functions to process normal and the last PEBS records, which
can be shared with the later patch.
Move the event updating related codes (intel_pmu_save_and_restart())
to the end, where all samples have been processed.
For the current usage, it doesn't matter when perf updates event counts
and reset the counter. Because all counters are stopped when the PEBS
buffer is drained.
Drop the return of the !intel_pmu_save_and_restart(event) check. Because
it never happen. The intel_pmu_save_and_restart(event) only returns 0,
when !hwc->event_base or the period_left > 0.
- The !hwc->event_base is impossible for the PEBS event, since the PEBS
event is only available on GP and fixed counters, which always have
a valid hwc->event_base.
- The check only happens for the case of non-AUTO_RELOAD and single
PEBS, which implies that the event must be overflowed. The period_left
must be always <= 0 for an overflowed event after the
x86_pmu_update().
Co-developed-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119135504.1463839-4-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Modify the pebs_basic and pebs_meminfo structs to make the bitfields
more explicit to ease readability of the code.
Co-developed-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119135504.1463839-3-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
The PEBS kernel warnings can still be observed with the below case.
when the below commands are running in parallel for a while.
while true;
do
perf record --no-buildid -a --intr-regs=AX \
-e cpu/event=0xd0,umask=0x81/pp \
-c 10003 -o /dev/null ./triad;
done &
while true;
do
perf record -e 'cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=3/uP' -W -d -- ./dtlb
done
The commit b752ea0c28 ("perf/x86/intel/ds: Flush PEBS DS when changing
PEBS_DATA_CFG") intends to flush the entire PEBS buffer before the
hardware is reprogrammed. However, it fails in the above case.
The first perf command utilizes the large PEBS, while the second perf
command only utilizes a single PEBS. When the second perf event is
added, only the n_pebs++. The intel_pmu_pebs_enable() is invoked after
intel_pmu_pebs_add(). So the cpuc->n_pebs == cpuc->n_large_pebs check in
the intel_pmu_drain_large_pebs() fails. The PEBS DS is not flushed.
The new PEBS event should not be taken into account when flushing the
existing PEBS DS.
The check is unnecessary here. Before the hardware is reprogrammed, all
the stale records must be drained unconditionally.
For single PEBS or PEBS-vi-pt, the DS must be empty. The drain_pebs()
can handle the empty case. There is no harm to unconditionally drain the
PEBS DS.
Fixes: b752ea0c28 ("perf/x86/intel/ds: Flush PEBS DS when changing PEBS_DATA_CFG")
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119135504.1463839-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Andy reported that clang gets upset with CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH=n:
kernel/sched/fair.c:6580:20: error: unused function 'cfs_bandwidth_used' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
6580 | static inline bool cfs_bandwidth_used(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Indeed, cfs_bandwidth_used() is only used within functions defined under
CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH=y. Remove its CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH=n declaration &
definition.
Reported-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241127165501.160004-1-vschneid@redhat.com
After commit b58652db66 ("sched/deadline: Fix task_struct reference
leak"), I identified additional calls to hrtimer_try_to_cancel that
might also require a dl_server check. It remains unclear whether this
omission was intentional or accidental in those contexts.
This patch consolidates the timer cancellation logic into dedicated
functions, ensuring consistent behavior across all calls.
Additionally, it reduces code duplication and improves overall code
cleanliness.
Note the use of the __always_inline keyword. In some instances, we
have a task_struct pointer, dereference the dl member, and then use
the container_of macro to retrieve the task_struct pointer again. By
inlining the code, the compiler can potentially optimize out this
redundant round trip.
Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240724142253.27145-3-wander@redhat.com
Currently we check for bandwidth overflow potentially due to hotplug
operations at the end of sched_cpu_deactivate(), after the cpu going
offline has already been removed from scheduling, active_mask, etc.
This can create issues for DEADLINE tasks, as there is a substantial
race window between the start of sched_cpu_deactivate() and the moment
we possibly decide to roll-back the operation if dl_bw_deactivate()
returns failure in cpuset_cpu_inactive(). An example is a throttled
task that sees its replenishment timer firing while the cpu it was
previously running on is considered offline, but before
dl_bw_deactivate() had a chance to say no and roll-back happened.
Fix this by directly calling dl_bw_deactivate() first thing in
sched_cpu_deactivate() and do the required calculation in the former
function considering the cpu passed as an argument as offline already.
By doing so we also simplify sched_cpu_deactivate(), as there is no need
anymore for any kind of roll-back if we fail early.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Zzc1DfPhbvqDDIJR@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb
For hotplug operations, DEADLINE needs to check that there is still enough
bandwidth left after removing the CPU that is going offline. We however
fail to do so currently.
Restore the correct behavior by restructuring dl_bw_manage() a bit, so
that overflow conditions (not enough bandwidth left) are properly
checked. Also account for dl_server bandwidth, i.e. discount such
bandwidth in the calculation since NORMAL tasks will be anyway moved
away from the CPU as a result of the hotplug operation.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241114142810.794657-3-juri.lelli@redhat.com
When root domain non-destructive changes (e.g., only modifying one of
the existing root domains while the rest is not touched) happen we still
need to clear DEADLINE bandwidth accounting so that it's then properly
restored, taking into account DEADLINE tasks associated to each cpuset
(associated to each root domain). After the introduction of dl_servers,
we fail to restore such servers contribution after non-destructive
changes (as they are only considered on destructive changes when
runqueues are attached to the new domains).
Fix this by making sure we iterate over the dl_servers attached to
domains that have not been destroyed and add their bandwidth
contribution back correctly.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241114142810.794657-2-juri.lelli@redhat.com
task_on_rq_queued read p->on_rq without READ_ONCE, though p->on_rq is
set with WRITE_ONCE in {activate|deactivate}_task and smp_store_release
in __block_task, and also read with READ_ONCE in task_on_rq_migrating.
Make all of these accesses pair together by adding READ_ONCE in the
task_on_rq_queued.
Signed-off-by: Harshit Agarwal <harshit@nutanix.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241114210812.1836587-1-jon@nutanix.com
When steal time exceeds the measured delta when updating clock_task, we
currently try to catch up the excess in future updates.
However, this results in inaccurate run times for the future things using
clock_task, in some situations, as they end up getting additional steal
time that did not actually happen.
This is because there is a window between reading the elapsed time in
update_rq_clock() and sampling the steal time in update_rq_clock_task().
If the VCPU gets preempted between those two points, any additional
steal time is accounted to the outgoing task even though the calculated
delta did not actually contain any of that "stolen" time.
When this race happens, we can end up with steal time that exceeds the
calculated delta, and the previous code would try to catch up that excess
steal time in future clock updates, which is given to the next,
incoming task, even though it did not actually have any time stolen.
This behavior is particularly bad when steal time can be very long,
which we've seen when trying to extend steal time to contain the duration
that the host was suspended [0]. When this happens, clock_task stays
frozen, during which the running task stays running for the whole
duration, since its run time doesn't increase.
However the race can happen even under normal operation.
Ideally we would read the elapsed cpu time and the steal time atomically,
to prevent this race from happening in the first place, but doing so
is non-trivial.
Since the time between those two points isn't otherwise accounted anywhere,
neither to the outgoing task nor the incoming task (because the "end of
outgoing task" and "start of incoming task" timestamps are the same),
I would argue that the right thing to do is to simply drop any excess steal
time, in order to prevent these issues.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20240820043543.837914-1-suleiman@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241118043745.1857272-1-suleiman@google.com
Anders had bisected a crash using PREEMPT_RT with linux-next and
isolated it down to commit 894d1b3db4 ("locking/mutex: Remove
wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock"), where it seemed the
wake_q structure was somehow getting corrupted causing a null
pointer traversal.
I was able to easily repoduce this with PREEMPT_RT and managed
to isolate down that through various call stacks we were
actually calling wake_up_q() twice on the same wake_q.
I found that in the problematic commit, I had added the
wake_up_q() call in task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() around
__ww_mutex_add_waiter(), following a similar pattern in
__mutex_lock_common().
However, its just wrong. We haven't dropped the lock->wait_lock,
so its contrary to the point of the original patch. And it
didn't match the __mutex_lock_common() logic of re-initializing
the wake_q after calling it midway in the stack.
Looking at it now, the wake_up_q() call is incorrect and should
just be removed. So drop the erronious logic I had added.
Fixes: 894d1b3db4 ("locking/mutex: Remove wakeups from under mutex::wait_lock")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6afb936f-17c7-43fa-90e0-b9e780866097@app.fastmail.com/
Reported-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241114190051.552665-1-jstultz@google.com
When running the following command:
while true; do
stress-ng --cyclic 30 --timeout 30s --minimize --quiet
done
a warning is eventually triggered:
WARNING: CPU: 43 PID: 2848 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:794
setup_new_dl_entity+0x13e/0x180
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1c4/0x2df
? enqueue_dl_entity+0x631/0x6e0
? setup_new_dl_entity+0x13e/0x180
? __warn+0x7e/0xd0
? report_bug+0x11a/0x1a0
? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70
? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
enqueue_dl_entity+0x631/0x6e0
enqueue_task_dl+0x7d/0x120
__do_set_cpus_allowed+0xe3/0x280
__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x140/0x1d0
__set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x54/0xa0
migrate_enable+0x7e/0x150
rt_spin_unlock+0x1c/0x90
group_send_sig_info+0xf7/0x1a0
? kill_pid_info+0x1f/0x1d0
kill_pid_info+0x78/0x1d0
kill_proc_info+0x5b/0x110
__x64_sys_kill+0x93/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xf0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
RIP: 0033:0x7f0dab31f92b
This warning occurs because set_cpus_allowed dequeues and enqueues tasks
with the ENQUEUE_RESTORE flag set. If the task is boosted, the warning
is triggered. A boosted task already had its parameters set by
rt_mutex_setprio, and a new call to setup_new_dl_entity is unnecessary,
hence the WARN_ON call.
Check if we are requeueing a boosted task and avoid calling
setup_new_dl_entity if that's the case.
Fixes: 295d6d5e37 ("sched/deadline: Fix switching to -deadline")
Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240724142253.27145-2-wander@redhat.com
Update the documentation for the `preempt=' parameter which now also
accepts `lazy'.
Fixes: 7c70cb94d2 ("sched: Add Lazy preemption model")
Reported-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241122173557.MYOtT95Q@linutronix.de
Scheduler raises a SCHED_SOFTIRQ to trigger a load balancing event on
from the IPI handler on the idle CPU. If the SMP function is invoked
from an idle CPU via flush_smp_call_function_queue() then the HARD-IRQ
flag is not set and raise_softirq_irqoff() needlessly wakes ksoftirqd
because soft interrupts are handled before ksoftirqd get on the CPU.
Adding a trace_printk() in nohz_csd_func() at the spot of raising
SCHED_SOFTIRQ and enabling trace events for sched_switch, sched_wakeup,
and softirq_entry (for SCHED_SOFTIRQ vector alone) helps observing the
current behavior:
<idle>-0 [000] dN.1.: nohz_csd_func: Raising SCHED_SOFTIRQ from nohz_csd_func
<idle>-0 [000] dN.4.: sched_wakeup: comm=ksoftirqd/0 pid=16 prio=120 target_cpu=000
<idle>-0 [000] .Ns1.: softirq_entry: vec=7 [action=SCHED]
<idle>-0 [000] .Ns1.: softirq_exit: vec=7 [action=SCHED]
<idle>-0 [000] d..2.: sched_switch: prev_comm=swapper/0 prev_pid=0 prev_prio=120 prev_state=R ==> next_comm=ksoftirqd/0 next_pid=16 next_prio=120
ksoftirqd/0-16 [000] d..2.: sched_switch: prev_comm=ksoftirqd/0 prev_pid=16 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=swapper/0 next_pid=0 next_prio=120
...
Use __raise_softirq_irqoff() to raise the softirq. The SMP function call
is always invoked on the requested CPU in an interrupt handler. It is
guaranteed that soft interrupts are handled at the end.
Following are the observations with the changes when enabling the same
set of events:
<idle>-0 [000] dN.1.: nohz_csd_func: Raising SCHED_SOFTIRQ for nohz_idle_balance
<idle>-0 [000] dN.1.: softirq_raise: vec=7 [action=SCHED]
<idle>-0 [000] .Ns1.: softirq_entry: vec=7 [action=SCHED]
No unnecessary ksoftirqd wakeups are seen from idle task's context to
service the softirq.
Fixes: b2a02fc43a ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/fcf823f-195e-6c9a-eac3-25f870cb35ac@inria.fr/ [1]
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119054432.6405-5-kprateek.nayak@amd.com
Commit b2a02fc43a ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()")
optimizes IPIs to idle CPUs in TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG mode by setting the
TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag in idle task's thread info and relying on
flush_smp_call_function_queue() in idle exit path to run the
call-function. A softirq raised by the call-function is handled shortly
after in do_softirq_post_smp_call_flush() but the TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag
remains set and is only cleared later when schedule_idle() calls
__schedule().
need_resched() check in _nohz_idle_balance() exists to bail out of load
balancing if another task has woken up on the CPU currently in-charge of
idle load balancing which is being processed in SCHED_SOFTIRQ context.
Since the optimization mentioned above overloads the interpretation of
TIF_NEED_RESCHED, check for idle_cpu() before going with the existing
need_resched() check which can catch a genuine task wakeup on an idle
CPU processing SCHED_SOFTIRQ from do_softirq_post_smp_call_flush(), as
well as the case where ksoftirqd needs to be preempted as a result of
new task wakeup or slice expiry.
In case of PREEMPT_RT or threadirqs, although the idle load balancing
may be inhibited in some cases on the ilb CPU, the fact that ksoftirqd
is the only fair task going back to sleep will trigger a newidle balance
on the CPU which will alleviate some imbalance if it exists if idle
balance fails to do so.
Fixes: b2a02fc43a ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()")
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119054432.6405-4-kprateek.nayak@amd.com
The need_resched() check currently in nohz_csd_func() can be tracked
to have been added in scheduler_ipi() back in 2011 via commit
ca38062e57 ("sched: Use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle balance")
Since then, it has travelled quite a bit but it seems like an idle_cpu()
check currently is sufficient to detect the need to bail out from an
idle load balancing. To justify this removal, consider all the following
case where an idle load balancing could race with a task wakeup:
o Since commit f3dd3f6745 ("sched: Remove the limitation of WF_ON_CPU
on wakelist if wakee cpu is idle") a target perceived to be idle
(target_rq->nr_running == 0) will return true for
ttwu_queue_cond(target) which will offload the task wakeup to the idle
target via an IPI.
In all such cases target_rq->ttwu_pending will be set to 1 before
queuing the wake function.
If an idle load balance races here, following scenarios are possible:
- The CPU is not in TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG mode in which case an actual
IPI is sent to the CPU to wake it out of idle. If the
nohz_csd_func() queues before sched_ttwu_pending(), the idle load
balance will bail out since idle_cpu(target) returns 0 since
target_rq->ttwu_pending is 1. If the nohz_csd_func() is queued after
sched_ttwu_pending() it should see rq->nr_running to be non-zero and
bail out of idle load balancing.
- The CPU is in TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG mode and instead of an actual IPI,
the sender will simply set TIF_NEED_RESCHED for the target to put it
out of idle and flush_smp_call_function_queue() in do_idle() will
execute the call function. Depending on the ordering of the queuing
of nohz_csd_func() and sched_ttwu_pending(), the idle_cpu() check in
nohz_csd_func() should either see target_rq->ttwu_pending = 1 or
target_rq->nr_running to be non-zero if there is a genuine task
wakeup racing with the idle load balance kick.
o The waker CPU perceives the target CPU to be busy
(targer_rq->nr_running != 0) but the CPU is in fact going idle and due
to a series of unfortunate events, the system reaches a case where the
waker CPU decides to perform the wakeup by itself in ttwu_queue() on
the target CPU but target is concurrently selected for idle load
balance (XXX: Can this happen? I'm not sure, but we'll consider the
mother of all coincidences to estimate the worst case scenario).
ttwu_do_activate() calls enqueue_task() which would increment
"rq->nr_running" post which it calls wakeup_preempt() which is
responsible for setting TIF_NEED_RESCHED (via a resched IPI or by
setting TIF_NEED_RESCHED on a TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG idle CPU) The key
thing to note in this case is that rq->nr_running is already non-zero
in case of a wakeup before TIF_NEED_RESCHED is set which would
lead to idle_cpu() check returning false.
In all cases, it seems that need_resched() check is unnecessary when
checking for idle_cpu() first since an impending wakeup racing with idle
load balancer will either set the "rq->ttwu_pending" or indicate a newly
woken task via "rq->nr_running".
Chasing the reason why this check might have existed in the first place,
I came across Peter's suggestion on the fist iteration of Suresh's
patch from 2011 [1] where the condition to raise the SCHED_SOFTIRQ was:
sched_ttwu_do_pending(list);
if (unlikely((rq->idle == current) &&
rq->nohz_balance_kick &&
!need_resched()))
raise_softirq_irqoff(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);
Since the condition to raise the SCHED_SOFIRQ was preceded by
sched_ttwu_do_pending() (which is equivalent of sched_ttwu_pending()) in
the current upstream kernel, the need_resched() check was necessary to
catch a newly queued task. Peter suggested modifying it to:
if (idle_cpu() && rq->nohz_balance_kick && !need_resched())
raise_softirq_irqoff(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);
where idle_cpu() seems to have replaced "rq->idle == current" check.
Even back then, the idle_cpu() check would have been sufficient to catch
a new task being enqueued. Since commit b2a02fc43a ("smp: Optimize
send_call_function_single_ipi()") overloads the interpretation of
TIF_NEED_RESCHED for TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG idling, remove the
need_resched() check in nohz_csd_func() to raise SCHED_SOFTIRQ based
on Peter's suggestion.
Fixes: b2a02fc43a ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()")
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119054432.6405-3-kprateek.nayak@amd.com
do_softirq_post_smp_call_flush() on PREEMPT_RT kernels carries a
WARN_ON_ONCE() for any SOFTIRQ being raised from an SMP-call-function.
Since do_softirq_post_smp_call_flush() is called with preempt disabled,
raising a SOFTIRQ during flush_smp_call_function_queue() can lead to
longer preempt disabled sections.
Since commit b2a02fc43a ("smp: Optimize
send_call_function_single_ipi()") IPIs to an idle CPU in
TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG mode can be optimized out by instead setting
TIF_NEED_RESCHED bit in idle task's thread_info and relying on the
flush_smp_call_function_queue() in the idle-exit path to run the
SMP-call-function.
To trigger an idle load balancing, the scheduler queues
nohz_csd_function() responsible for triggering an idle load balancing on
a target nohz idle CPU and sends an IPI. Only now, this IPI is optimized
out and the SMP-call-function is executed from
flush_smp_call_function_queue() in do_idle() which can raise a
SCHED_SOFTIRQ to trigger the balancing.
So far, this went undetected since, the need_resched() check in
nohz_csd_function() would make it bail out of idle load balancing early
as the idle thread does not clear TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG before calling
flush_smp_call_function_queue(). The need_resched() check was added with
the intent to catch a new task wakeup, however, it has recently
discovered to be unnecessary and will be removed in the subsequent
commit after which nohz_csd_function() can raise a SCHED_SOFTIRQ from
flush_smp_call_function_queue() to trigger an idle load balance on an
idle target in TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG mode.
nohz_csd_function() bails out early if "idle_cpu()" check for the
target CPU, and does not lock the target CPU's rq until the very end,
once it has found tasks to run on the CPU and will not inhibit the
wakeup of, or running of a newly woken up higher priority task. Account
for this and prevent a WARN_ON_ONCE() when SCHED_SOFTIRQ is raised from
flush_smp_call_function_queue().
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119054432.6405-2-kprateek.nayak@amd.com
Commit 8f9ea86fdf added some logic to sched_setaffinity that included
a WARN when a per-task affinity assignment races with a cpuset update.
Specifically, we can have a race where a cpuset update results in the
task affinity no longer being a subset of the cpuset. That's fine; we
have a fallback to instead use the cpuset mask. However, we have a WARN
set up that will trigger if the cpuset mask has no overlap at all with
the requested task affinity. This shouldn't be a warning condition; its
trivial to create this condition.
Reproduced the warning by the following setup:
- $PID inside a cpuset cgroup
- another thread repeatedly switching the cpuset cpus from 1-2 to just 1
- another thread repeatedly setting the $PID affinity (via taskset) to 2
Fixes: 8f9ea86fdf ("sched: Always preserve the user requested cpumask")
Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Acked-and-tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Madadi Vineeth Reddy <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241111182738.1832953-1-joshdon@google.com
The condition in replenish_dl_new_period() that checks if a reservation
(dl_server) is deferred and is not handling a starvation case is
obviously wrong.
Fix it.
Fixes: a110a81c52 ("sched/deadline: Deferrable dl server")
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241127063740.8278-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com
Going forward, struct intel_display is the main device data structure
for display. Convert the high level interfaces (init, cleanup, suspend,
resume, etc.) of intel_display_power.c over to it. The actual power
get/put etc. are left for follow-up.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/e1761b0fe5081bf6ca21cca3430befe254f61b32.1732808222.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
