commit 904cdbd41d upstream.
Now, we capture a data corruption problem on ext4 while we're truncating
an extent index block. Imaging that if we are revoking a buffer which
has been journaled by the committing transaction, the buffer's jbddirty
flag will not be cleared in jbd2_journal_forget(), so the commit code
will set the buffer dirty flag again after refile the buffer.
fsx kjournald2
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
jbd2_journal_revoke commit phase 1~5...
jbd2_journal_forget
belongs to older transaction commit phase 6
jbddirty not clear __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer
__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer
test_clear_buffer_jbddirty
mark_buffer_dirty
Finally, if the freed extent index block was allocated again as data
block by some other files, it may corrupt the file data after writing
cached pages later, such as during unmount time. (In general,
clean_bdev_aliases() related helpers should be invoked after
re-allocation to prevent the above corruption, but unfortunately we
missed it when zeroout the head of extra extent blocks in
ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents()).
This patch mark buffer as freed and set j_next_transaction to the new
transaction when it already belongs to the committing transaction in
jbd2_journal_forget(), so that commit code knows it should clear dirty
bits when it is done with the buffer.
This problem can be reproduced by xfstests generic/455 easily with
seeds (3246 3247 3248 3249).
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit b2569260d5 upstream.
If ext4 tries to start a reserved handle via
jbd2_journal_start_reserved(), and the journal has been aborted, this
can result in a NULL pointer dereference. This is because the fields
h_journal and h_transaction in the handle structure share the same
memory, via a union, so jbd2_journal_start_reserved() will clear
h_journal before calling start_this_handle(). If this function fails
due to an aborted handle, h_journal will still be NULL, and the call
to jbd2_journal_free_reserved() will pass a NULL journal to
sub_reserve_credits().
This can be reproduced by running "kvm-xfstests -c dioread_nolock
generic/475".
Fixes: 8f7d89f368 ("jbd2: transaction reservation support")
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 85e0c4e89c upstream.
This updates the jbd2 superblock unnecessarily, and on an abort we
shouldn't truncate the log.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit e09463f220 upstream.
Do not set the b_modified flag in block's journal head should not
until after we're sure that jbd2_journal_dirty_metadat() will not
abort with an error due to there not being enough space reserved in
the jbd2 handle.
Otherwise, future attempts to modify the buffer may lead a large
number of spurious errors and warnings.
This addresses CVE-2018-10883.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200071
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: Drop the added logging statement, as it's on
a code path that doesn't exist here]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit e112666b49 upstream.
If the journal has been aborted, we shouldn't mark the underlying
buffer head as dirty, since that will cause the metadata block to get
modified. And if the journal has been aborted, we shouldn't allow
this since it will almost certainly lead to a corrupted file system.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit 559cce698e upstream.
When 'jh->b_transaction == transaction' (asserted by below)
J_ASSERT_JH(jh, (jh->b_transaction == transaction || ...
'journal->j_list_lock' will be incorrectly unlocked, since
the the lock is aquired only at the end of if / else-if
statements (missing the else case).
Signed-off-by: Taesoo Kim <tsgatesv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Fixes: 6e4862a5bb
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit c0a2ad9b50 upstream.
On umount path, jbd2_journal_destroy() writes latest transaction ID
(->j_tail_sequence) to be used at next mount.
The bug is that ->j_tail_sequence is not holding latest transaction ID
in some cases. So, at next mount, there is chance to conflict with
remaining (not overwritten yet) transactions.
mount (id=10)
write transaction (id=11)
write transaction (id=12)
umount (id=10) <= the bug doesn't write latest ID
mount (id=10)
write transaction (id=11)
crash
mount
[recovery process]
transaction (id=11)
transaction (id=12) <= valid transaction ID, but old commit
must not replay
Like above, this bug become the cause of recovery failure, or FS
corruption.
So why ->j_tail_sequence doesn't point latest ID?
Because if checkpoint transactions was reclaimed by memory pressure
(i.e. bdev_try_to_free_page()), then ->j_tail_sequence is not updated.
(And another case is, __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() is called
with empty transaction.)
So in above cases, ->j_tail_sequence is not pointing latest
transaction ID at umount path. Plus, REQ_FLUSH for checkpoint is not
done too.
So, to fix this problem with minimum changes, this patch updates
->j_tail_sequence, and issue REQ_FLUSH. (With more complex changes,
some optimizations would be possible to avoid unnecessary REQ_FLUSH
for example though.)
BTW,
journal->j_tail_sequence =
++journal->j_transaction_sequence;
Increment of ->j_transaction_sequence seems to be unnecessary, but
ext3 does this.
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
commit bc23f0c8d7 upstream.
Ted and Namjae have reported that truncated pages don't get timely
reclaimed after being truncated in data=journal mode. The following test
triggers the issue easily:
for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
pwrite(fd, buf, 1024*1024, 0);
fsync(fd);
fsync(fd);
ftruncate(fd, 0);
}
The reason is that journal_unmap_buffer() finds that truncated buffers
are not journalled (jh->b_transaction == NULL), they are part of
checkpoint list of a transaction (jh->b_cp_transaction != NULL) and have
been already written out (!buffer_dirty(bh)). We clean such buffers but
we leave them in the checkpoint list. Since checkpoint transaction holds
a reference to the journal head, these buffers cannot be released until
the checkpoint transaction is cleaned up. And at that point we don't
call release_buffer_page() anymore so pages detached from mapping are
lingering in the system waiting for reclaim to find them and free them.
Fix the problem by removing buffers from transaction checkpoint lists
when journal_unmap_buffer() finds out they don't have to be there
anymore.
Reported-and-tested-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Fixes: de1b794130
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
commit 4327ba52af upstream.
If a EXT4 filesystem utilizes JBD2 journaling and an error occurs, the
journaling will be aborted first and the error number will be recorded
into JBD2 superblock and, finally, the system will enter into the
panic state in "errors=panic" option. But, in the rare case, this
sequence is little twisted like the below figure and it will happen
that the system enters into panic state, which means the system reset
in mobile environment, before completion of recording an error in the
journal superblock. In this case, e2fsck cannot recognize that the
filesystem failure occurred in the previous run and the corruption
wouldn't be fixed.
Task A Task B
ext4_handle_error()
-> jbd2_journal_abort()
-> __journal_abort_soft()
-> __jbd2_journal_abort_hard()
| -> journal->j_flags |= JBD2_ABORT;
|
| __ext4_abort()
| -> jbd2_journal_abort()
| | -> __journal_abort_soft()
| | -> if (journal->j_flags & JBD2_ABORT)
| | return;
| -> panic()
|
-> jbd2_journal_update_sb_errno()
Tested-by: Hobin Woo <hobin.woo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
commit 841df7df19 upstream.
Commit 6f6a6fda29 "jbd2: fix ocfs2 corrupt when updating journal
superblock fails" changed jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() to return EIO
when the journal is aborted. That makes logic in
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() bail out which is fine, except that
jbd2_journal_destroy() expects jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() to always make
a progress in cleaning the journal. Without it jbd2_journal_destroy()
just loops in an infinite loop.
Fix jbd2_journal_destroy() to cleanup journal checkpoint lists of
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() fails with error.
Reported-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Fixes: 6f6a6fda29
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
[ luis: backported to 3.16: used Jan's backport ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
commit 6f6a6fda29 upstream.
If updating journal superblock fails after journal data has been
flushed, the error is omitted and this will mislead the caller as a
normal case. In ocfs2, the checkpoint will be treated successfully
and the other node can get the lock to update. Since the sb_start is
still pointing to the old log block, it will rewrite the journal data
during journal recovery by the other node. Thus the new updates will
be overwritten and ocfs2 corrupts. So in above case we have to return
the error, and ocfs2_commit_cache will take care of the error and
prevent the other node to do update first. And only after recovering
journal it can do the new updates.
The issue discussion mail can be found at:
https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2015-June/010856.htmlhttp://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/48841
[ Fixed bug in patch which allowed a non-negative error return from
jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() to leak out of jbd2_fjournal_flush(); this
was causing xfstests ext4/306 to fail. -- Ted ]
Reported-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Tested-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@huawei.com>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
commit e531d0bceb upstream.
The journal revoke block recovery code does not check r_count for
sanity, which means that an evil value of r_count could result in
the kernel reading off the end of the revoke table and into whatever
garbage lies beyond. This could crash the kernel, so fix that.
However, in testing this fix, I discovered that the code to write
out the revoke tables also was not correctly checking to see if the
block was full -- the current offset check is fine so long as the
revoke table space size is a multiple of the record size, but this
is not true when either journal_csum_v[23] are set.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
commit 9d50659406 upstream.
Currently when journal restart fails, we'll have the h_transaction of
the handle set to NULL to indicate that the handle has been effectively
aborted. We handle this situation quietly in the jbd2_journal_stop() and just
free the handle and exit because everything else has been done before we
attempted (and failed) to restart the journal.
Unfortunately there are a number of problems with that approach
introduced with commit
41a5b91319 "jbd2: invalidate handle if jbd2_journal_restart()
fails"
First of all in ext4 jbd2_journal_stop() will be called through
__ext4_journal_stop() where we would try to get a hold of the superblock
by dereferencing h_transaction which in this case would lead to NULL
pointer dereference and crash.
In addition we're going to free the handle regardless of the refcount
which is bad as well, because others up the call chain will still
reference the handle so we might potentially reference already freed
memory.
Moreover it's expected that we'll get aborted handle as well as detached
handle in some of the journalling function as the error propagates up
the stack, so it's unnecessary to call WARN_ON every time we get
detached handle.
And finally we might leak some memory by forgetting to free reserved
handle in jbd2_journal_stop() in the case where handle was detached from
the transaction (h_transaction is NULL).
Fix the NULL pointer dereference in __ext4_journal_stop() by just
calling jbd2_journal_stop() quietly as suggested by Jan Kara. Also fix
the potential memory leak in jbd2_journal_stop() and use proper
handle refcounting before we attempt to free it to avoid use-after-free
issues.
And finally remove all WARN_ON(!transaction) from the code so that we do
not get random traces when something goes wrong because when journal
restart fails we will get to some of those functions.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
commit 064d83892e upstream.
Free the buffer head if the journal descriptor block fails checksum
verification.
This is the jbd2 port of the e2fsprogs patch "e2fsck: free bh on csum
verify error in do_one_pass".
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
commit db9ee22036 upstream.
It turns out that there are some serious problems with the on-disk
format of journal checksum v2. The foremost is that the function to
calculate descriptor tag size returns sizes that are too big. This
causes alignment issues on some architectures and is compounded by the
fact that some parts of jbd2 use the structure size (incorrectly) to
determine the presence of a 64bit journal instead of checking the
feature flags.
Therefore, introduce journal checksum v3, which enlarges the
descriptor block tag format to allow for full 32-bit checksums of
journal blocks, fix the journal tag function to return the correct
sizes, and fix the jbd2 recovery code to use feature flags to
determine 64bitness.
Add a few function helpers so we don't have to open-code quite so
many pieces.
Switching to a 16-byte block size was found to increase journal size
overhead by a maximum of 0.1%, to convert a 32-bit journal with no
checksumming to a 32-bit journal with checksum v3 enabled.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reported-by: TR Reardon <thomas_reardon@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 022eaa7517 upstream.
When recovering the journal, don't fall into an infinite loop if we
encounter a corrupt journal block. Instead, just skip the block and
return an error, which fails the mount and thus forces the user to run
a full filesystem fsck.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The mount manpage says of the max_batch_time option,
This optimization can be turned off entirely
by setting max_batch_time to 0.
But the code doesn't do that. So fix the code to do
that.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fix up error messages printed when the transaction pointers in a
journal head are inconsistent. This improves the error messages which
are printed when running xfstests generic/068 in data=journal mode.
See the bug report at: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60786
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
It's not needed until we start trying to modifying fields in the
journal_head which are protected by j_list_lock.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
It's not needed until we start trying to modifying fields in the
journal_head which are protected by j_list_lock.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
jh->b_transaction is adequately protected for reading by the
jbd_lock_bh_state(bh), so we don't need to take j_list_lock in
__journal_try_to_free_buffer().
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
We don't otherwise need j_list_lock during the rest of commit phase
#7, so add the transaction to the checkpoint list at the very end of
commit phase #6. This allows us to drop j_list_lock earlier, which is
a good thing since it is a super hot lock.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
The two hottest locks, and thus the biggest scalability bottlenecks,
in the jbd2 layer, are the j_list_lock and j_state_lock. This has
inspired some people to do some truly unnatural things[1].
[1] https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/fast14/fast14-paper_kang.pdf
We don't need to be holding both j_state_lock and j_list_lock while
calculating the journal statistics, so move those calculations to the
very end of jbd2_journal_commit_transaction.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
The j_state_lock is one of the hottest locks in the jbd2 layer and
thus one of its scalability bottlenecks.
We don't need to be holding the j_state_lock while we are calling
wake_up(&journal->j_wait_commit), so release the lock a little bit
earlier.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
During commit process, keep the block device plugged after we are done
writing the revoke records, until we are finished writing the rest of
the commit records in the journal. This will allow most of the
journal blocks to be written in a single I/O operation, instead of
separating the the revoke blocks from the rest of the journal blocks.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Mark functions as static in jbd2/journal.c because they are not used
outside this file.
This eliminates the following warning in jbd2/journal.c:
fs/jbd2/journal.c:125:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘jbd2_verify_csum_type’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
fs/jbd2/journal.c:146:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘jbd2_superblock_csum_verify’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
fs/jbd2/journal.c:154:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘jbd2_superblock_csum_set’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
If start_this_handle() fails then it leads to a use after free of
"handle".
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Some of KERN_EMERG printk messages do not really deserve this log
level and the one in log_wait_commit() is even rather useless (the
journal has been previously aborted and *that* is where we should have
been complaining). So make some messages just KERN_ERR and remove the
useless message.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
If a handle runs out of space, we currently stop the kernel with a BUG
in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(). This makes it hard to figure out
what might be going on. So return an error of ENOSPC, so we can let
the file system layer figure out what is going on, to make it more
likely we can get useful debugging information). This should make it
easier to debug problems such as the one which was reported by:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44731
The only two callers of this function are ext4_handle_dirty_metadata()
and ocfs2_journal_dirty(). The ocfs2 function will trigger a
BUG_ON(), which means there will be no change in behavior. The ext4
function will call ext4_error_inode() which will print the useful
debugging information and then handle the situation using ext4's error
handling mechanisms (i.e., which might mean halting the kernel or
remounting the file system read-only).
Also, since both file systems already call WARN_ON(), drop the WARN_ON
from jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() to avoid two stack traces from
being displayed.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Acked-by: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
In the jbd2 checksumming code, explicitly declare separate variables with
endianness information so that we don't get confused and screw things up again.
Also fixes sparse warnings.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
If jbd2_journal_restart() fails the handle will have been disconnected
from the current transaction. In this situation, the handle must not
be used for for any jbd2 function other than jbd2_journal_stop().
Enforce this with by treating a handle which has a NULL transaction
pointer as an aborted handle, and issue a kernel warning if
jbd2_journal_extent(), jbd2_journal_get_write_access(),
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(), etc. is called with an invalid handle.
This commit also fixes a bug where jbd2_journal_stop() would trip over
a kernel jbd2 assertion check when trying to free an invalid handle.
Also move the responsibility of setting current->journal_info to
start_this_handle(), simplifying the three users of this function.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported-by: Younger Liu <younger.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Once we decrement transaction->t_updates, if this is the last handle
holding the transaction from closing, and once we release the
t_handle_lock spinlock, it's possible for the transaction to commit
and be released. In practice with normal kernels, this probably won't
happen, since the commit happens in a separate kernel thread and it's
unlikely this could all happen within the space of a few CPU cycles.
On the other hand, with a real-time kernel, this could potentially
happen, so save the tid found in transaction->t_tid before we release
t_handle_lock. It would require an insane configuration, such as one
where the jbd2 thread was set to a very high real-time priority,
perhaps because a high priority real-time thread is trying to read or
write to a file system. But some people who use real-time kernels
have been known to do insane things, including controlling
laser-wielding industrial robots. :-)
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Some of the functions which modify the jbd2 superblock were not
updating the checksum before calling jbd2_write_superblock(). Move
the call to jbd2_superblock_csum_set() to jbd2_write_superblock(), so
that the checksum is calculated consistently.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Commit b6e96d0067 ("jbd2: use module parameters instead of debugfs
for jbd_debug") removed any need for a dependency on DEBUG_FS. It
also moved the /sys variables out from underneath the typical debugfs
mount point. Delete the dependency and update the /sys path to where
the debug settings are currently.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk()
calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like
the following (see lines marked with "*"):
[ 290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes
[ 290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104
[ 290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ
[* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit:
[* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103
[* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104
[ 290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records
[ 290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079
i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction
have become interleaved. The output should have been:
(fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103
(fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104
It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able
to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy
I/O load.
Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Suggested-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently we see this output:
$git grep phase fs/jbd2
fs/jbd2/commit.c: jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 1\n");
fs/jbd2/commit.c: jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 2\n");
fs/jbd2/commit.c: jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 2\n");
fs/jbd2/commit.c: jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 3\n");
fs/jbd2/commit.c: jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 4\n");
[...]
There is clearly a duplicate label for phase 2, and they are
both active (i.e. not in #if ... #else block). Rename them to
be "2a" and "2b" so the debug output is unambiguous.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
While trying to debug an an issue under extreme I/O loading
on preempt-rt kernels, the following backtrace was observed
via SysRQ output:
rm D ffff8802203afbc0 4600 4878 4748 0x00000000
ffff8802217bfb78 0000000000000082 ffff88021fc2bb80 ffff88021fc2bb80
ffff88021fc2bb80 ffff8802217bffd8 ffff8802217bffd8 ffff8802217bffd8
ffff88021f1d4c80 ffff88021fc2bb80 ffff8802217bfb88 ffff88022437b000
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8172dc34>] schedule+0x24/0x70
[<ffffffff81225b5d>] jbd2_log_wait_commit+0xbd/0x140
[<ffffffff81060390>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x50/0x50
[<ffffffff81223635>] jbd2_log_do_checkpoint+0xf5/0x520
[<ffffffff81223b09>] __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0xa9/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8121dc40>] start_this_handle.isra.10+0x2e0/0x530
[<ffffffff81060390>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x50/0x50
[<ffffffff8121e0a3>] jbd2__journal_start+0xc3/0x110
[<ffffffff811de7ce>] ? ext4_rmdir+0x6e/0x230
[<ffffffff8121e0fe>] jbd2_journal_start+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff811f308b>] ext4_journal_start_sb+0x5b/0x160
[<ffffffff811de7ce>] ext4_rmdir+0x6e/0x230
[<ffffffff811435c5>] vfs_rmdir+0xd5/0x140
[<ffffffff8114370f>] do_rmdir+0xdf/0x120
[<ffffffff8105c6b4>] ? task_work_run+0x44/0x80
[<ffffffff81002889>] ? do_notify_resume+0x89/0x100
[<ffffffff817361ae>] ? int_signal+0x12/0x17
[<ffffffff81145d85>] sys_unlinkat+0x25/0x40
[<ffffffff81735f22>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
What is interesting here, is that we call log_wait_commit, from
within wait_for_space, but we are still holding the checkpoint_mutex
as it surrounds mostly the whole of wait_for_space. And then, as we
are waiting, journal_commit_transaction can run, and if the JBD2_FLUSHED
bit is set, then we will also try to take the same checkpoint_mutex.
It seems that we need to drop the checkpoint_mutex while sitting in
jbd2_log_wait_commit, if we want to guarantee that progress can be made
by jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(). There does not seem to be
anything preempt-rt specific about this, other then perhaps increasing
the odds of it happening.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
The state lock is taken after we are doing an assert on the state
value, not before. So we might in fact be doing an assert on a
transient value. Ensure the state check is within the scope of
the state lock being taken.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Current implementation of jbd2_journal_force_commit() is suboptimal because
result in empty and useless commits. But callers just want to force and wait
any unfinished commits. We already have jbd2_journal_force_commit_nested()
which does exactly what we want, except we are guaranteed that we do not hold
journal transaction open.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
In some cases we cannot start a transaction because of locking
constraints and passing started transaction into those places is not
handy either because we could block transaction commit for too long.
Transaction reservation is designed to solve these issues. It
reserves a handle with given number of credits in the journal and the
handle can be later attached to the running transaction without
blocking on commit or checkpointing. Reserved handles do not block
transaction commit in any way, they only reduce maximum size of the
running transaction (because we have to always be prepared to
accomodate request for attaching reserved handle).
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
j_wait_logspace and j_wait_checkpoint are unused. Remove them.
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
jbd2_journal_extend() first checked whether transaction can accept
extending handle with more credits and then added credits to
t_outstanding_credits. This can race with start_this_handle() adding
another handle to a transaction and thus overbooking a transaction.
Make jbd2_journal_extend() use atomic_add_return() to close the race.
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
__jbd2_log_space_left() and jbd_space_needed() were kind of odd.
jbd_space_needed() accounted also credits needed for currently
committing transaction while it didn't account for credits needed for
control blocks. __jbd2_log_space_left() then accounted for control
blocks as a fraction of free space. Since results of these two
functions are always only compared against each other, this works
correct but is somewhat strange. Move the estimates so that
jbd_space_needed() returns number of blocks needed for a transaction
including control blocks and __jbd2_log_space_left() returns free
space in the journal (with the committing transaction already
subtracted). Rename functions to jbd2_log_space_left() and
jbd2_space_needed() while we are changing them.
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
The comment about credit estimates isn't true anymore. We do what the
comment describes now.
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently when we add a buffer to a transaction, we wait until the
buffer is removed from BJ_Shadow list (so that we prevent any changes
to the buffer that is just written to the journal). This can take
unnecessarily long as a lot happens between the time the buffer is
submitted to the journal and the time when we remove the buffer from
BJ_Shadow list. (e.g. We wait for all data buffers in the
transaction, we issue a cache flush, etc.) Also this creates a
dependency of do_get_write_access() on transaction commit (namely
waiting for data IO to complete) which we want to avoid when
implementing transaction reservation.
So we modify commit code to set new BH_Shadow flag when temporary
shadowing buffer is created and we clear that flag once IO on that
buffer is complete. This allows do_get_write_access() to wait only
for BH_Shadow bit and thus removes the dependency on data IO
completion.
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Similarly as for metadata buffers, also log descriptor buffers don't
really need the journal head. So strip it and remove BJ_LogCtl list.
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
When writing metadata to the journal, we create temporary buffer heads
for that task. We also attach journal heads to these buffer heads but
the only purpose of the journal heads is to keep buffers linked in
transaction's BJ_IO list. We remove the need for journal heads by
reusing buffer_head's b_assoc_buffers list for that purpose. Also
since BJ_IO list is just a temporary list for transaction commit, we
use a private list in jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() for that thus
removing BJ_IO list from transaction completely.
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
