commit 8fb1dcbbcc upstream.
This reverts commit 7e06de7c83.
Commit 7e06de7c83 ("btrfs: canonicalize the device path before adding
it") tries to make btrfs to use "/dev/mapper/*" name first, then any
filename inside "/dev/" as the device path.
This is mostly fine when there is only the root namespace involved, but
when multiple namespace are involved, things can easily go wrong for the
d_path() usage.
As d_path() returns a file path that is namespace dependent, the
resulted string may not make any sense in another namespace.
Furthermore, the "/dev/" prefix checks itself is not reliable, one can
still make a valid initramfs without devtmpfs, and fill all needed
device nodes manually.
Overall the userspace has all its might to pass whatever device path for
mount, and we are not going to win the war trying to cover every corner
case.
So just revert that commit, and do no extra d_path() based file path
sanity check.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250115185608.GA2223535@zen.localdomain/
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit be3f1938d3 upstream.
In run_delalloc_nocow(), when the found btrfs_key's offset > cur_offset,
it indicates a gap between the current processing region and
the next file extent. The original code would directly jump to
the "must_cow" label, which increments the slot and forces a fallback
to COW. This behavior might skip an extent item and result in an
overestimated COW fallback range.
This patch modifies the logic so that when a gap is detected:
- If no COW range is already being recorded (cow_start is unset),
cow_start is set to cur_offset.
- cur_offset is then advanced to the beginning of the next extent.
- Instead of jumping to "must_cow", control flows directly to
"next_slot" so that the same extent item can be reexamined properly.
The change ensures that we accurately account for the extent gap and
avoid accidentally extending the range that needs to fallback to COW.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chen <davechen@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit e08e49d986 upstream.
When running machines with 64k page size and a 16k nodesize we started
seeing tree log corruption in production. This turned out to be because
we were not writing out dirty blocks sometimes, so this in fact affects
all metadata writes.
When writing out a subpage EB we scan the subpage bitmap for a dirty
range. If the range isn't dirty we do
bit_start++;
to move onto the next bit. The problem is the bitmap is based on the
number of sectors that an EB has. So in this case, we have a 64k
pagesize, 16k nodesize, but a 4k sectorsize. This means our bitmap is 4
bits for every node. With a 64k page size we end up with 4 nodes per
page.
To make this easier this is how everything looks
[0 16k 32k 48k ] logical address
[0 4 8 12 ] radix tree offset
[ 64k page ] folio
[ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ][ 16k eb ] extent buffers
[ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ] bitmap
Now we use all of our addressing based on fs_info->sectorsize_bits, so
as you can see the above our 16k eb->start turns into radix entry 4.
When we find a dirty range for our eb, we correctly do bit_start +=
sectors_per_node, because if we start at bit 0, the next bit for the
next eb is 4, to correspond to eb->start 16k.
However if our range is clean, we will do bit_start++, which will now
put us offset from our radix tree entries.
In our case, assume that the first time we check the bitmap the block is
not dirty, we increment bit_start so now it == 1, and then we loop
around and check again. This time it is dirty, and we go to find that
start using the following equation
start = folio_start + bit_start * fs_info->sectorsize;
so in the case above, eb->start 0 is now dirty, and we calculate start
as
0 + 1 * fs_info->sectorsize = 4096
4096 >> 12 = 1
Now we're looking up the radix tree for 1, and we won't find an eb.
What's worse is now we're using bit_start == 1, so we do bit_start +=
sectors_per_node, which is now 5. If that eb is dirty we will run into
the same thing, we will look at an offset that is not populated in the
radix tree, and now we're skipping the writeout of dirty extent buffers.
The best fix for this is to not use sectorsize_bits to address nodes,
but that's a larger change. Since this is a fs corruption problem fix
it simply by always using sectors_per_node to increment the start bit.
Fixes: c4aec299fa ("btrfs: introduce submit_eb_subpage() to submit a subpage metadata page")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit b0c26f4799 ]
There was a bug report about a NULL pointer dereference in
__btrfs_add_free_space_zoned() that ultimately happens because a
conversion from the default metadata profile DUP to a RAID1 profile on two
disks.
The stack trace has the following signature:
BTRFS error (device sdc): zoned: write pointer offset mismatch of zones in raid1 profile
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000058
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
RIP: 0010:__btrfs_add_free_space_zoned.isra.0+0x61/0x1a0
RSP: 0018:ffffa236b6f3f6d0 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff96c8132f3400 RCX: 0000000000000001
RDX: 0000000010000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff96c8132f3410
RBP: 0000000010000000 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff96c758f65a40 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 000011aac0000000
FS: 00007fdab1cb2900(0000) GS:ffff96e60ca00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000058 CR3: 00000001a05ae000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27
? page_fault_oops+0x15c/0x2f0
? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x180
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
? __btrfs_add_free_space_zoned.isra.0+0x61/0x1a0
btrfs_add_free_space_async_trimmed+0x34/0x40
btrfs_add_new_free_space+0x107/0x120
btrfs_make_block_group+0x104/0x2b0
btrfs_create_chunk+0x977/0xf20
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x174/0x510
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
btrfs_inc_block_group_ro+0x1b1/0x230
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x9e/0x410
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x3f/0x130
btrfs_balance+0x8ac/0x12b0
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x14c/0x3e0
btrfs_ioctl+0x2686/0x2a80
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? ioctl_has_perm.constprop.0.isra.0+0xd2/0x120
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x82/0x160
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? __memcg_slab_free_hook+0x11a/0x170
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? kmem_cache_free+0x3f0/0x450
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x10/0x210
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160
? sysfs_emit+0xaf/0xc0
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? seq_read_iter+0x207/0x460
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? vfs_read+0x29c/0x370
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x10/0x210
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x160
? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x180
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7fdab1e0ca6d
RSP: 002b:00007ffeb2b60c80 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007fdab1e0ca6d
RDX: 00007ffeb2b60d80 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007ffeb2b60cd0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000013
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffeb2b6343b R14: 00007ffeb2b60d80 R15: 0000000000000001
</TASK>
CR2: 0000000000000058
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
The 1st line is the most interesting here:
BTRFS error (device sdc): zoned: write pointer offset mismatch of zones in raid1 profile
When a RAID1 block-group is created and a write pointer mismatch between
the disks in the RAID set is detected, btrfs sets the alloc_offset to the
length of the block group marking it as full. Afterwards the code expects
that a balance operation will evacuate the data in this block-group and
repair the problems.
But before this is possible, the new space of this block-group will be
accounted in the free space cache. But in __btrfs_add_free_space_zoned()
it is being checked if it is a initial creation of a block group and if
not a reclaim decision will be made. But the decision if a block-group's
free space accounting is done for an initial creation depends on if the
size of the added free space is the whole length of the block-group and
the allocation offset is 0.
But as btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info() sets the allocation offset to
the zone capacity (i.e. marking the block-group as full) this initial
decision is not met, and the space_info pointer in the 'struct
btrfs_block_group' has not yet been assigned.
Fail creation of the block group and rely on manual user intervention to
re-balance the filesystem.
Afterwards the filesystem can be unmounted, mounted in degraded mode and
the missing device can be removed after a full balance of the filesystem.
Reported-by: 西木野羰基 <yanqiyu01@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAB_b4sBhDe3tscz=duVyhc9hNE+gu=B8CrgLO152uMyanR8BEA@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: b1934cd606 ("btrfs: zoned: handle broken write pointer on zones")
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit bc2dbc4983 ]
[BUG]
When running btrfs/004 with 4K fs block size and 64K page size,
sometimes fsstress workload can take 100% CPU for a while, but not long
enough to trigger a 120s hang warning.
[CAUSE]
When such 100% CPU usage happens, btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() is
always in the call trace.
One example when this problem happens, the function
btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() got the following parameters:
lock_start = 4096, lockend = 20469
Then we calculate @page_lockstart by rounding up lock_start to page
boundary, which is 64K (page size is 64K).
For @page_lockend, we round down the value towards page boundary, which
result 0. Then since we need to pass an inclusive end to
filemap_range_has_page(), we subtract 1 from the rounded down value,
resulting in (u64)-1.
In the above case, the range is inside the same page, and we do not even
need to call filemap_range_has_page(), not to mention to call it with
(u64)-1 at the end.
This behavior will cause btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() to busy loop
waiting for irrelevant range to have its pages dropped.
[FIX]
Calculate @page_lockend by just rounding down @lockend, without
decreasing the value by one. So @page_lockend will no longer overflow.
Then exit early if @page_lockend is no larger than @page_lockstart.
As it means either the range is inside the same page, or the two pages
are adjacent already.
Finally only decrease @page_lockend when calling filemap_range_has_page().
Fixes: 0528476b6a ("btrfs: fix the filemap_range_has_page() call in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range()")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit dc08c58696 upstream.
Currently, displaying the btrfs subvol mount option doesn't escape ','.
This makes parsing /proc/self/mounts and /proc/self/mountinfo
ambiguous for subvolume names that contain commas. The text after the
comma could be mistaken for another option (think "subvol=foo,ro", where
ro is actually part of the subvolumes name).
Replace the manual escape characters list with a call to
seq_show_option(). Thanks to Calvin Walton for suggesting this approach.
Fixes: c8d3fe028f ("Btrfs: show subvol= and subvolid= in /proc/mounts")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Suggested-by: Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@kepstin.ca>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Kimmel <kernel@bareminimum.eu>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 35fec1089e upstream.
If do_zone_finish() is called with a filesystem that has missing devices
(e.g. a RAID file system mounted in degraded mode) it is accessing the
btrfs_device::zone_info pointer, which will not be set if the device
in question is missing.
Check if the device is present (by checking if it has a valid block device
pointer associated) and if not, skip zone finishing for it.
Fixes: 4dcbb8ab31 ("btrfs: zoned: make zone finishing multi stripe capable")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2bbc4a45e5 upstream.
If btrfs_zone_activate() is called with a filesystem that has missing
devices (e.g. a RAID file system mounted in degraded mode) it is accessing
the btrfs_device::zone_info pointer, which will not be set if the device in
question is missing.
Check if the device is present (by checking if it has a valid block
device pointer associated) and if not, skip zone activation for it.
Fixes: f9a912a3c4 ("btrfs: zoned: make zone activation multi stripe capable")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 009ca35848 upstream.
If we fail to add the chunk map to the fs mapping tree we exit
test_rmap_block() without freeing the chunk map. Fix this by adding a
call to btrfs_free_chunk_map() before exiting the test function if the
call to btrfs_add_chunk_map() failed.
Fixes: 7dc66abb5a ("btrfs: use a dedicated data structure for chunk maps")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12+
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 4c782247b8 upstream.
At close_ctree() after we have ran delayed iputs either through explicitly
calling btrfs_run_delayed_iputs() or later during the call to
btrfs_commit_super() or btrfs_error_commit_super(), we assert that the
delayed iputs list is empty.
When we have compressed writes this assertion may fail because delayed
iputs may have been added to the list after we last ran delayed iputs.
This happens like this:
1) We have a compressed write bio executing;
2) We enter close_ctree() and flush the fs_info->endio_write_workers
queue which is the queue used for running ordered extent completion;
3) The compressed write bio finishes and enters
btrfs_finish_compressed_write_work(), where it calls
btrfs_finish_ordered_extent() which in turn calls
btrfs_queue_ordered_fn(), which queues a work item in the
fs_info->endio_write_workers queue that we have flushed before;
4) At close_ctree() we proceed, run all existing delayed iputs and
call btrfs_commit_super() (which also runs delayed iputs), but before
we run the following assertion below:
ASSERT(list_empty(&fs_info->delayed_iputs))
A delayed iput is added by the step below...
5) The ordered extent completion job queued in step 3 runs and results in
creating a delayed iput when dropping the last reference of the ordered
extent (a call to btrfs_put_ordered_extent() made from
btrfs_finish_one_ordered());
6) At this point the delayed iputs list is not empty, so the assertion at
close_ctree() fails.
Fix this by flushing the fs_info->compressed_write_workers queue at
close_ctree() before flushing the fs_info->endio_write_workers queue,
respecting the queue dependency as the later is responsible for the
execution of ordered extent completion.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 7511e29cf1 ]
As far as I can tell, these calls of list_del_init() on bg_list cannot
run concurrently with btrfs_mark_bg_unused() or btrfs_mark_bg_to_reclaim(),
as they are in transaction error paths and situations where the block
group is readonly.
However, if there is any chance at all of racing with mark_bg_unused(),
or a different future user of bg_list, better to be safe than sorry.
Otherwise we risk the following interleaving (bg_list refcount in parens)
T1 (some random op) T2 (btrfs_mark_bg_unused)
!list_empty(&bg->bg_list); (1)
list_del_init(&bg->bg_list); (1)
list_move_tail (1)
btrfs_put_block_group (0)
btrfs_delete_unused_bgs
bg = list_first_entry
list_del_init(&bg->bg_list);
btrfs_put_block_group(bg); (-1)
Ultimately, this results in a broken ref count that hits zero one deref
early and the real final deref underflows the refcount, resulting in a WARNING.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 01af106a07 ]
It is meaningless to shift a byte count by folio_shift(). The folio index
is in units of PAGE_SIZE, not folio_size(). We can use folio_contains()
to make this work for arbitrary-order folios, so remove the assertion
that the folios are of order 0.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fdef89ce6f ]
At btrfs_qgroup_cleanup_dropped_subvolume() all we want to commit the
current transaction in order to have all the qgroup rfer/excl numbers up
to date. However we are using btrfs_start_transaction(), which joins the
current transaction if there is one that is not yet committing, but also
starts a new one if there is none or if the current one is already
committing (its state is >= TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START). This later case
results in unnecessary IO, wasting time and a pointless rotation of the
backup roots in the super block.
So instead of using btrfs_start_transaction() followed by a
btrfs_commit_transaction(), use btrfs_commit_current_transaction() which
achieves our purpose and avoids starting and committing new transactions.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 35d99c68af upstream.
Add btrfs_free_chunk_map() to free the memory allocated
by btrfs_alloc_chunk_map() if btrfs_add_chunk_map() fails.
Fixes: 7dc66abb5a ("btrfs: use a dedicated data structure for chunk maps")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Haoxiang Li <haoxiang_li2024@163.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit efa11fd269 ]
[BUG]
When running generic/418 with a btrfs whose block size < page size
(subpage cases), it always fails.
And the following minimal reproducer is more than enough to trigger it
reliably:
workload()
{
mkfs.btrfs -s 4k -f $dev > /dev/null
dmesg -C
mount $dev $mnt
$fsstree_dir/src/dio-invalidate-cache -r -b 4096 -n 3 -i 1 -f $mnt/diotest
ret=$?
umount $mnt
stop_trace
if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then
fail
fi
}
for (( i = 0; i < 1024; i++)); do
echo "=== $i/$runtime ==="
workload
done
[CAUSE]
With extra trace printk added to the following functions:
- btrfs_buffered_write()
* Which folio is touched
* The file offset (start) where the buffered write is at
* How many bytes are copied
* The content of the write (the first 2 bytes)
- submit_one_sector()
* Which folio is touched
* The position inside the folio
* The content of the page cache (the first 2 bytes)
- pagecache_isize_extended()
* The parameters of the function itself
* The parameters of the folio_zero_range()
Which are enough to show the problem:
22.158114: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=0 copied=4096 content=0x0101
22.158161: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=0 content=0x0101
22.158609: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=4096 copied=4096 content=0x0101
22.158634: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=8192 copied=4096 content=0x0101
22.158650: pagecache_isize_extended: folio=0 from=4096 to=8192 bsize=4096 zero off=4096 len=8192
22.158682: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=4096 content=0x0000
22.158686: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=8192 content=0x0101
The tool dio-invalidate-cache will start 3 threads, each doing a buffered
write with 0x01 at offset 0, 4096 and 8192, do a fsync, then do a direct read,
and compare the read buffer with the write buffer.
Note that all 3 btrfs_buffered_write() are writing the correct 0x01 into
the page cache.
But at submit_one_sector(), at file offset 4096, the content is zeroed
out, by pagecache_isize_extended().
The race happens like this:
Thread A is writing into range [4K, 8K).
Thread B is writing into range [8K, 12k).
Thread A | Thread B
-------------------------------------+------------------------------------
btrfs_buffered_write() | btrfs_buffered_write()
|- old_isize = 4K; | |- old_isize = 4096;
|- btrfs_inode_lock() | |
|- write into folio range [4K, 8K) | |
|- pagecache_isize_extended() | |
| extend isize from 4096 to 8192 | |
| no folio_zero_range() called | |
|- btrfs_inode_lock() | |
| |- btrfs_inode_lock()
| |- write into folio range [8K, 12K)
| |- pagecache_isize_extended()
| | calling folio_zero_range(4K, 8K)
| | This is caused by the old_isize is
| | grabbed too early, without any
| | inode lock.
| |- btrfs_inode_unlock()
The @old_isize is grabbed without inode lock, causing race between two
buffered write threads and making pagecache_isize_extended() to zero
range which is still containing cached data.
And this is only affecting subpage btrfs, because for regular blocksize
== page size case, the function pagecache_isize_extended() will do
nothing if the block size >= page size.
[FIX]
Grab the old i_size while holding the inode lock.
This means each buffered write thread will have a stable view of the
old inode size, thus avoid the above race.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Fixes: 5e8b9ef303 ("btrfs: move pos increment and pagecache extension to btrfs_buffered_write")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 8bf334beb3 ]
[BUG]
If submit_one_sector() failed inside extent_writepage_io() for sector
size < page size cases (e.g. 4K sector size and 64K page size), then
we can hit double ordered extent accounting error.
This should be very rare, as submit_one_sector() only fails when we
failed to grab the extent map, and such extent map should exist inside
the memory and has been pinned.
[CAUSE]
For example we have the following folio layout:
0 4K 32K 48K 60K 64K
|//| |//////| |///|
Where |///| is the dirty range we need to writeback. The 3 different
dirty ranges are submitted for regular COW.
Now we hit the following sequence:
- submit_one_sector() returned 0 for [0, 4K)
- submit_one_sector() returned 0 for [32K, 48K)
- submit_one_sector() returned error for [60K, 64K)
- btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() called for the whole folio
This will mark the following ranges as finished:
* [0, 4K)
* [32K, 48K)
Both ranges have their IO already submitted, this cleanup will
lead to double accounting.
* [60K, 64K)
That's the correct cleanup.
The only good news is, this error is only theoretical, as the target
extent map is always pinned, thus we should directly grab it from
memory, other than reading it from the disk.
[FIX]
Instead of calling btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() for the whole folio
range, which can touch ranges we should not touch, instead
move the error handling inside extent_writepage_io().
So that we can cleanup exact sectors that ought to be submitted but failed.
This provides much more accurate cleanup, avoiding the double accounting.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 72dad8e377 ]
[BUG]
When running btrfs with block size (4K) smaller than page size (64K,
aarch64), there is a very high chance to crash the kernel at
generic/750, with the following messages:
(before the call traces, there are 3 extra debug messages added)
BTRFS warning (device dm-3): read-write for sector size 4096 with page size 65536 is experimental
BTRFS info (device dm-3): checking UUID tree
hrtimer: interrupt took 5451385 ns
BTRFS error (device dm-3): cow_file_range failed, root=4957 inode=257 start=1605632 len=69632: -28
BTRFS error (device dm-3): run_delalloc_nocow failed, root=4957 inode=257 start=1605632 len=69632: -28
BTRFS error (device dm-3): failed to run delalloc range, root=4957 ino=257 folio=1572864 submit_bitmap=8-15 start=1605632 len=69632: -28
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 3020984 at ordered-data.c:360 can_finish_ordered_extent+0x370/0x3b8 [btrfs]
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 3020984 Comm: kworker/u24:1 Tainted: G OE 6.13.0-rc1-custom+ #89
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
pc : can_finish_ordered_extent+0x370/0x3b8 [btrfs]
lr : can_finish_ordered_extent+0x1ec/0x3b8 [btrfs]
Call trace:
can_finish_ordered_extent+0x370/0x3b8 [btrfs] (P)
can_finish_ordered_extent+0x1ec/0x3b8 [btrfs] (L)
btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished+0x130/0x2b8 [btrfs]
extent_writepage+0x10c/0x3b8 [btrfs]
extent_write_cache_pages+0x21c/0x4e8 [btrfs]
btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x160 [btrfs]
do_writepages+0x74/0x190
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x74/0xa0
start_delalloc_inodes+0x17c/0x3b0 [btrfs]
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x17c/0x288 [btrfs]
shrink_delalloc+0x11c/0x280 [btrfs]
flush_space+0x288/0x328 [btrfs]
btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x228/0x680
worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS critical (device dm-3): bad ordered extent accounting, root=4957 ino=257 OE offset=1605632 OE len=16384 to_dec=16384 left=0
BTRFS critical (device dm-3): bad ordered extent accounting, root=4957 ino=257 OE offset=1622016 OE len=12288 to_dec=12288 left=0
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008
BTRFS critical (device dm-3): bad ordered extent accounting, root=4957 ino=257 OE offset=1634304 OE len=8192 to_dec=4096 left=0
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 3286940 Comm: kworker/u24:3 Tainted: G W OE 6.13.0-rc1-custom+ #89
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] (btrfs-endio-write)
pstate: 404000c5 (nZcv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : process_one_work+0x110/0x680
lr : worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
Call trace:
process_one_work+0x110/0x680 (P)
worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360 (L)
worker_thread+0x1bc/0x360
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: f84086a1 f9000fe1 53041c21 b9003361 (f9400661)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception
SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
SMP: failed to stop secondary CPUs 2-3
Dumping ftrace buffer:
(ftrace buffer empty)
Kernel Offset: 0x275bb9540000 from 0xffff800080000000
PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffff8fbba0000000
CPU features: 0x100,00000070,00801250,8201720b
[CAUSE]
The above warning is triggered immediately after the delalloc range
failure, this happens in the following sequence:
- Range [1568K, 1636K) is dirty
1536K 1568K 1600K 1636K 1664K
| |/////////|////////| |
Where 1536K, 1600K and 1664K are page boundaries (64K page size)
- Enter extent_writepage() for page 1536K
- Enter run_delalloc_nocow() with locked page 1536K and range
[1568K, 1636K)
This is due to the inode having preallocated extents.
- Enter cow_file_range() with locked page 1536K and range
[1568K, 1636K)
- btrfs_reserve_extent() only reserved two extents
The main loop of cow_file_range() only reserved two data extents,
Now we have:
1536K 1568K 1600K 1636K 1664K
| |<-->|<--->|/|///////| |
1584K 1596K
Range [1568K, 1596K) has an ordered extent reserved.
- btrfs_reserve_extent() failed inside cow_file_range() for file offset
1596K
This is already a bug in our space reservation code, but for now let's
focus on the error handling path.
Now cow_file_range() returned -ENOSPC.
- btrfs_run_delalloc_range() do error cleanup <<< ROOT CAUSE
Call btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() with locked folio 1536K and range
[1568K, 1636K)
Function btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() normally needs to skip the
ranges inside the folio, as it will normally be cleaned up by
extent_writepage().
Such split error handling is already problematic in the first place.
What's worse is the folio range skipping itself, which is not taking
subpage cases into consideration at all, it will only skip the range
if the page start >= the range start.
In our case, the page start < the range start, since for subpage cases
we can have delalloc ranges inside the folio but not covering the
folio.
So it doesn't skip the page range at all.
This means all the ordered extents, both [1568K, 1584K) and
[1584K, 1596K) will be marked as IOERR.
And these two ordered extents have no more pending ios, they are marked
finished, and *QUEUED* to be deleted from the io tree.
- extent_writepage() do error cleanup
Call btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished() for the range [1536K, 1600K).
Although ranges [1568K, 1584K) and [1584K, 1596K) are finished, the
deletion from io tree is async, it may or may not happen at this
time.
If the ranges have not yet been removed, we will do double cleaning on
those ranges, triggering the above ordered extent warnings.
In theory there are other bugs, like the cleanup in extent_writepage()
can cause double accounting on ranges that are submitted asynchronously
(compression for example).
But that's much harder to trigger because normally we do not mix regular
and compression delalloc ranges.
[FIX]
The folio range split is already buggy and not subpage compatible, it
was introduced a long time ago where subpage support was not even considered.
So instead of splitting the ordered extents cleanup into the folio range
and out of folio range, do all the cleanup inside writepage_delalloc().
- Pass @NULL as locked_folio for btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() in
btrfs_run_delalloc_range()
- Skip the btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents() if writepage_delalloc()
failed
So all ordered extents are only cleaned up by
btrfs_run_delalloc_range().
- Handle the ranges that already have ordered extents allocated
If part of the folio already has ordered extent allocated, and
btrfs_run_delalloc_range() failed, we also need to cleanup that range.
Now we have a concentrated error handling for ordered extents during
btrfs_run_delalloc_range().
Fixes: d1051d6ebf ("btrfs: Fix error handling in btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 8bf334beb3 ("btrfs: fix double accounting race when extent_writepage_io() failed")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 011a9a1f24 ]
As extent_writepage() is internal helper we should use our inode type,
so change it from struct inode.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 8bf334beb3 ("btrfs: fix double accounting race when extent_writepage_io() failed")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0f71202665 ]
Since there is no user of reader locks, rename the writer locks into a
more generic name, by removing the "_writer" part from the name.
And also rename btrfs_subpage::writer into btrfs_subpage::locked.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 8bf334beb3 ("btrfs: fix double accounting race when extent_writepage_io() failed")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 336e69f302 ]
Since commit d7172f52e9 ("btrfs: use per-buffer locking for
extent_buffer reading"), metadata read no longer relies on the subpage
reader locking.
This means we do not need to maintain a different metadata/data split
for locking, so we can convert the existing reader lock users by:
- add_ra_bio_pages()
Convert to btrfs_folio_set_writer_lock()
- end_folio_read()
Convert to btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock()
- begin_folio_read()
Convert to btrfs_folio_set_writer_lock()
- folio_range_has_eb()
Remove the subpage->readers checks, since it is always 0.
- Remove btrfs_subpage_start_reader() and btrfs_subpage_end_reader()
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 8bf334beb3 ("btrfs: fix double accounting race when extent_writepage_io() failed")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 8511074c42 ]
This function is not really suitable to lock a folio, as it lacks the
proper mapping checks, thus the locked folio may not even belong to
btrfs.
And due to the above reason, the last user inside lock_delalloc_folios()
is already removed, and we can remove this function.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 8bf334beb3 ("btrfs: fix double accounting race when extent_writepage_io() failed")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c96d0e3921 ]
Currently we only mark sectors as locked if there is a *NEW* delalloc
range for it.
But NEW delalloc range is not the same as dirty sectors we want to
submit, e.g:
0 32K 64K 96K 128K
| |////////||///////| |////|
120K
For above 64K page size case, writepage_delalloc() for page 0 will find
and lock the delalloc range [32K, 96K), which is beyond the page
boundary.
Then when writepage_delalloc() is called for the page 64K, since [64K,
96K) is already locked, only [120K, 128K) will be locked.
This means, although range [64K, 96K) is dirty and will be submitted
later by extent_writepage_io(), it will not be marked as locked.
This is fine for now, as we call btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock_bitmap() to
free every non-compressed sector, and compression is only allowed for
full page range.
But this is not safe for future sector perfect compression support, as
this can lead to double folio unlock:
Thread A | Thread B
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------
| submit_one_async_extent()
| |- extent_clear_unlock_delalloc()
extent_writepage() | |- btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock()
|- btrfs_folio_end_writer_lock_bitmap()| |- btrfs_subpage_end_and_test_writer()
| | | |- atomic_sub_and_test()
| | | /* Now the atomic value is 0 */
|- if (atomic_read() == 0) | |
|- folio_unlock() | |- folio_unlock()
The root cause is the above range [64K, 96K) is dirtied and should also
be locked but it isn't.
So to make everything more consistent and prepare for the incoming
sector perfect compression, mark all dirty sectors as locked.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 8bf334beb3 ("btrfs: fix double accounting race when extent_writepage_io() failed")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2bca8eb077 ]
Currently for subpage (sector size < page size) cases, we reuse subpage
locked bitmap to find out all delalloc ranges we have locked, and run
all those found ranges.
However such reuse is not perfect, e.g.:
0 32K 64K 96K 128K
| |////////||///////| |////|
120K
For above range, writepage_delalloc() for page 0 will handle the range
[32K, 96k), note delalloc range can be beyond the page boundary.
But writepage_delalloc() for page 64K will only handle range [120K,
128K), as the previous run on page 0 has already handled range [64K,
96K).
Meanwhile for the writeback we should expect range [64K, 96K) to also be
locked, this leads to the mismatch from locked bitmap and delalloc
range.
This is not causing problems yet, but it's still an inconsistent
behavior.
So instead of relying on the subpage locked bitmap, move the delalloc
range search using local @delalloc_bitmap, so that we can remove the
existing btrfs_folio_find_writer_locked().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 8bf334beb3 ("btrfs: fix double accounting race when extent_writepage_io() failed")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 928b4de66e ]
The function extent_writepage_io() will submit the dirty sectors inside
the page for the write.
But recently to co-operate with the incoming subpage compression
enhancement, a new bitmap is introduced to
btrfs_bio_ctrl::submit_bitmap, to only avoid a subset of the dirty
range.
This is because we can have the following cases with 64K page size:
0 16K 32K 48K 64K
| |/////////| |/|
52K
For range [16K, 32K), we queue the dirty range for compression, which is
ran in a delayed workqueue.
Then for range [48K, 52K), we go through the regular submission path.
In that case, our btrfs_bio_ctrl::submit_bitmap will exclude the range
[16K, 32K).
The dirty flags for the range [16K, 32K) is only cleared when the
compression is done, by the extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() call inside
submit_one_async_extent().
This patch fix the false alert by removing the
btrfs_folio_assert_not_dirty() check, since it's no longer correct for
subpage compression cases.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 8bf334beb3 ("btrfs: fix double accounting race when extent_writepage_io() failed")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit acc18e1c1d ]
After commit ac325fc2aa ("btrfs: do not hold the extent lock for entire
read") we can now trigger a race between a task doing a direct IO write
and readahead. When this race is triggered it results in tasks getting
stale data when they attempt do a buffered read (including the task that
did the direct IO write).
This race can be sporadically triggered with test case generic/418, failing
like this:
$ ./check generic/418
FSTYP -- btrfs
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 debian0 6.13.0-rc7-btrfs-next-185+ #17 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb 3 12:28:46 WET 2025
MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
generic/418 14s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/418.out.bad)
# --- tests/generic/418.out 2020-06-10 19:29:03.850519863 +0100
# +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/418.out.bad 2025-02-03 15:42:36.974609476 +0000
@@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
QA output created by 418
+cmpbuf: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
+[6:0] FAIL - comparison failed, offset 24576
+diotest -wp -b 4096 -n 8 -i 4 failed at loop 3
Silence is golden
...
(Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/generic/418.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/418.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/418
Failures: generic/418
Failed 1 of 1 tests
The race happens like this:
1) A file has a prealloc extent for the range [16K, 28K);
2) Task A starts a direct IO write against file range [24K, 28K).
At the start of the direct IO write it invalidates the page cache at
__iomap_dio_rw() with kiocb_invalidate_pages() for the 4K page at file
offset 24K;
3) Task A enters btrfs_dio_iomap_begin() and locks the extent range
[24K, 28K);
4) Task B starts a readahead for file range [16K, 28K), entering
btrfs_readahead().
First it attempts to read the page at offset 16K by entering
btrfs_do_readpage(), where it calls get_extent_map(), locks the range
[16K, 20K) and gets the extent map for the range [16K, 28K), caching
it into the 'em_cached' variable declared in the local stack of
btrfs_readahead(), and then unlocks the range [16K, 20K).
Since the extent map has the prealloc flag, at btrfs_do_readpage() we
zero out the page's content and don't submit any bio to read the page
from the extent.
Then it attempts to read the page at offset 20K entering
btrfs_do_readpage() where we reuse the previously cached extent map
(decided by get_extent_map()) since it spans the page's range and
it's still in the inode's extent map tree.
Just like for the previous page, we zero out the page's content since
the extent map has the prealloc flag set.
Then it attempts to read the page at offset 24K entering
btrfs_do_readpage() where we reuse the previously cached extent map
(decided by get_extent_map()) since it spans the page's range and
it's still in the inode's extent map tree.
Just like for the previous pages, we zero out the page's content since
the extent map has the prealloc flag set. Note that we didn't lock the
extent range [24K, 28K), so we didn't synchronize with the ongoing
direct IO write being performed by task A;
5) Task A enters btrfs_create_dio_extent() and creates an ordered extent
for the range [24K, 28K), with the flags BTRFS_ORDERED_DIRECT and
BTRFS_ORDERED_PREALLOC set;
6) Task A unlocks the range [24K, 28K) at btrfs_dio_iomap_begin();
7) The ordered extent enters btrfs_finish_one_ordered() and locks the
range [24K, 28K);
8) Task A enters fs/iomap/direct-io.c:iomap_dio_complete() and it tries
to invalidate the page at offset 24K by calling
kiocb_invalidate_post_direct_write(), resulting in a call chain that
ends up at btrfs_release_folio().
The btrfs_release_folio() call ends up returning false because the range
for the page at file offset 24K is currently locked by the task doing
the ordered extent completion in the previous step (7), so we have:
btrfs_release_folio() ->
__btrfs_release_folio() ->
try_release_extent_mapping() ->
try_release_extent_state()
This last function checking that the range is locked and returning false
and propagating it up to btrfs_release_folio().
So this results in a failure to invalidate the page and
kiocb_invalidate_post_direct_write() triggers this message logged in
dmesg:
Page cache invalidation failure on direct I/O. Possible data corruption due to collision with buffered I/O!
After this we leave the page cache with stale data for the file range
[24K, 28K), filled with zeroes instead of the data written by direct IO
write (all bytes with a 0x01 value), so any task attempting to read with
buffered IO, including the task that did the direct IO write, will get
all bytes in the range with a 0x00 value instead of the written data.
Fix this by locking the range, with btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(),
at the two callers of btrfs_do_readpage() instead of doing it at
get_extent_map(), just like we did before commit ac325fc2aa ("btrfs: do
not hold the extent lock for entire read"), and unlocking the range after
all the calls to btrfs_do_readpage(). This way we never reuse a cached
extent map without flushing any pending ordered extents from a concurrent
direct IO write.
Fixes: ac325fc2aa ("btrfs: do not hold the extent lock for entire read")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 06de96faf7 ]
The double underscore naming scheme does not apply here, there's only
only get_extent_map(). As the definition is changed also pass the struct
btrfs_inode.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: acc18e1c1d ("btrfs: fix stale page cache after race between readahead and direct IO write")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit da2dccd745 upstream.
At btrfs_write_check() if our file's i_size is not sector size aligned and
we have a write that starts at an offset larger than the i_size that falls
within the same page of the i_size, then we end up not zeroing the file
range [i_size, write_offset).
The code is this:
start_pos = round_down(pos, fs_info->sectorsize);
oldsize = i_size_read(inode);
if (start_pos > oldsize) {
/* Expand hole size to cover write data, preventing empty gap */
loff_t end_pos = round_up(pos + count, fs_info->sectorsize);
ret = btrfs_cont_expand(BTRFS_I(inode), oldsize, end_pos);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
So if our file's i_size is 90269 bytes and a write at offset 90365 bytes
comes in, we get 'start_pos' set to 90112 bytes, which is less than the
i_size and therefore we don't zero out the range [90269, 90365) by
calling btrfs_cont_expand().
This is an old bug introduced in commit 9036c10208 ("Btrfs: update hole
handling v2"), from 2008, and the buggy code got moved around over the
years.
Fix this by discarding 'start_pos' and comparing against the write offset
('pos') without any alignment.
This bug was recently exposed by test case generic/363 which tests this
scenario by polluting ranges beyond EOF with an mmap write and than verify
that after a file increases we get zeroes for the range which is supposed
to be a hole and not what we wrote with the previous mmaped write.
We're only seeing this exposed now because generic/363 used to run only
on xfs until last Sunday's fstests update.
The test was failing like this:
$ ./check generic/363
FSTYP -- btrfs
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 debian0 6.13.0-rc7-btrfs-next-185+ #17 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb 3 12:28:46 WET 2025
MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
generic/363 0s ... [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/363.out.bad)
# --- tests/generic/363.out 2025-02-05 15:31:14.013646509 +0000
# +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/363.out.bad 2025-02-05 17:25:33.112630781 +0000
@@ -1 +1,46 @@
QA output created by 363
+READ BAD DATA: offset = 0xdcad, size = 0xd921, fname = /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/dev/junk
+OFFSET GOOD BAD RANGE
+0x1609d 0x0000 0x3104 0x0
+operation# (mod 256) for the bad data may be 4
+0x1609e 0x0000 0x0472 0x1
+operation# (mod 256) for the bad data may be 4
...
(Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/generic/363.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/363.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/363
Failures: generic/363
Failed 1 of 1 tests
Fixes: 9036c10208 ("Btrfs: update hole handling v2")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2c8507c63f upstream.
This commit re-attempts the backport of the change to the linux-6.12.y
branch. Commit 9f372e86b9 ("btrfs: avoid monopolizing a core when
activating a swap file") on this branch was reverted.
During swap activation we iterate over the extents of a file and we can
have many thousands of them, so we can end up in a busy loop monopolizing
a core. Avoid this by doing a voluntary reschedule after processing each
extent.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit 9f372e86b9.
The backport for linux-6.12.y, commit 9f372e86b9 ("btrfs: avoid
monopolizing a core when activating a swap file"), inserted
cond_resched() in the wrong location.
Revert it now; a subsequent commit will re-backport the original patch.
Fixes: 9f372e86b9 ("btrfs: avoid monopolizing a core when activating a swap file") # linux-6.12.y
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 6a4730b325 ]
This BUG_ON is meant to catch backref cache problems, but these can
arise from either bugs in the backref cache or corruption in the extent
tree. Fix it to be a proper error.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 5324c4e10e ]
A data race occurs when the function `insert_ordered_extent_file_extent()`
and the function `btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write()` are executed
concurrently. The function `insert_ordered_extent_file_extent()` is not
locked when reading inode->disk_i_size, causing
`btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write()` to cause data competition when
writing inode->disk_i_size, thus affecting the value of `modify_tree`.
The specific call stack that appears during testing is as follows:
============DATA_RACE============
btrfs_drop_extents+0x89a/0xa060 [btrfs]
insert_reserved_file_extent+0xb54/0x2960 [btrfs]
insert_ordered_extent_file_extent+0xff5/0x1760 [btrfs]
btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x1b85/0x36a0 [btrfs]
btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x37/0x60 [btrfs]
finish_ordered_fn+0x3e/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_work_helper+0x9c9/0x27a0 [btrfs]
process_scheduled_works+0x716/0xf10
worker_thread+0xb6a/0x1190
kthread+0x292/0x330
ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
============OTHER_INFO============
btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write+0x4ec/0x600 [btrfs]
btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x24c7/0x36a0 [btrfs]
btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x37/0x60 [btrfs]
finish_ordered_fn+0x3e/0x50 [btrfs]
btrfs_work_helper+0x9c9/0x27a0 [btrfs]
process_scheduled_works+0x716/0xf10
worker_thread+0xb6a/0x1190
kthread+0x292/0x330
ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
=================================
The main purpose of the check of the inode's disk_i_size is to avoid
taking write locks on a btree path when we have a write at or beyond
EOF, since in these cases we don't expect to find extent items in the
root to drop. However if we end up taking write locks due to a data
race on disk_i_size, everything is still correct, we only add extra
lock contention on the tree in case there's concurrency from other tasks.
If the race causes us to not take write locks when we actually need them,
then everything is functionally correct as well, since if we find out we
have extent items to drop and we took read locks (modify_tree set to 0),
we release the path and retry again with write locks.
Since this data race does not affect the correctness of the function,
it is a harmless data race, use data_race() to check inode->disk_i_size.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao-ran Zheng <zhenghaoran154@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c9c8637933 ]
[BUG]
There is a bug report that btrfs outputs the following error message:
BTRFS info (device nvme0n1p2): qgroup scan completed (inconsistency flag cleared)
BTRFS warning (device nvme0n1p2): failed to cleanup qgroup 0/1179: -2
[CAUSE]
The error itself is pretty harmless, and the end user should ignore it.
When a subvolume is fully dropped, btrfs will call
btrfs_qgroup_cleanup_dropped_subvolume() to delete the qgroup.
However if a qgroup rescan happened before a subvolume fully dropped,
qgroup for that subvolume will not be re-created, as rescan will only
create new qgroup if there is a BTRFS_ROOT_REF_KEY found.
But before we drop a subvolume, the subvolume is unlinked thus there is no
BTRFS_ROOT_REF_KEY.
In that case, btrfs_remove_qgroup() will fail with -ENOENT and trigger
the above error message.
[FIX]
Just ignore -ENOENT error from btrfs_remove_qgroup() inside
btrfs_qgroup_cleanup_dropped_subvolume().
Reported-by: John Shand <jshand2013@gmail.com>
Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236056
Fixes: 839d6ea4f8 ("btrfs: automatically remove the subvolume qgroup")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit c2b47df81c upstream.
[BUG]
With CONFIG_DEBUG_VM set, test case generic/476 has some chance to crash
with the following VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO():
BTRFS error (device dm-3): cow_file_range failed, start 1146880 end 1253375 len 106496 ret -28
BTRFS error (device dm-3): run_delalloc_nocow failed, start 1146880 end 1253375 len 106496 ret -28
page: refcount:4 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000592787cc index:0x12 pfn:0x10664
aops:btrfs_aops [btrfs] ino:101 dentry name(?):"f1774"
flags: 0x2fffff80004028(uptodate|lru|private|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xfffff)
page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio))
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:2992!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 3943513 Comm: kworker/u24:15 Tainted: G OE 6.12.0-rc7-custom+ #87
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
pc : folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258
lr : folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258
Call trace:
folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258
btrfs_folio_clamp_clear_dirty+0x80/0xd0 [btrfs]
__process_folios_contig+0x154/0x268 [btrfs]
extent_clear_unlock_delalloc+0x5c/0x80 [btrfs]
run_delalloc_nocow+0x5f8/0x760 [btrfs]
btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0xa8/0x220 [btrfs]
writepage_delalloc+0x230/0x4c8 [btrfs]
extent_writepage+0xb8/0x358 [btrfs]
extent_write_cache_pages+0x21c/0x4e8 [btrfs]
btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x150 [btrfs]
do_writepages+0x74/0x190
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x88/0xc8
start_delalloc_inodes+0x178/0x3a8 [btrfs]
btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x174/0x280 [btrfs]
shrink_delalloc+0x114/0x280 [btrfs]
flush_space+0x250/0x2f8 [btrfs]
btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x164/0x408
worker_thread+0x25c/0x388
kthread+0x100/0x118
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: 910a8021 a90363f7 a9046bf9 94012379 (d4210000)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[CAUSE]
The first two lines of extra debug messages show the problem is caused
by the error handling of run_delalloc_nocow().
E.g. we have the following dirtied range (4K blocksize 4K page size):
0 16K 32K
|//////////////////////////////////////|
| Pre-allocated |
And the range [0, 16K) has a preallocated extent.
- Enter run_delalloc_nocow() for range [0, 16K)
Which found range [0, 16K) is preallocated, can do the proper NOCOW
write.
- Enter fallback_to_fow() for range [16K, 32K)
Since the range [16K, 32K) is not backed by preallocated extent, we
have to go COW.
- cow_file_range() failed for range [16K, 32K)
So cow_file_range() will do the clean up by clearing folio dirty,
unlock the folios.
Now the folios in range [16K, 32K) is unlocked.
- Enter extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() from run_delalloc_nocow()
Which is called with PAGE_START_WRITEBACK to start page writeback.
But folios can only be marked writeback when it's properly locked,
thus this triggered the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO().
Furthermore there is another hidden but common bug that
run_delalloc_nocow() is not clearing the folio dirty flags in its error
handling path.
This is the common bug shared between run_delalloc_nocow() and
cow_file_range().
[FIX]
- Clear folio dirty for range [@start, @cur_offset)
Introduce a helper, cleanup_dirty_folios(), which
will find and lock the folio in the range, clear the dirty flag and
start/end the writeback, with the extra handling for the
@locked_folio.
- Introduce a helper to clear folio dirty, start and end writeback
- Introduce a helper to record the last failed COW range end
This is to trace which range we should skip, to avoid double
unlocking.
- Skip the failed COW range for the error handling
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit d0f038104f upstream.
There is a recent ML report that mounting a large fs backed by hardware
RAID56 controller (with one device missing) took too much time, and
systemd seems to kill the mount attempt.
In that case, the only error message is:
BTRFS error (device sdj): open_ctree failed
There is no reason on why the failure happened, making it very hard to
understand the reason.
At least output the error number (in the particular case it should be
-EINTR) to provide some clue.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/9b9c4d2810abcca2f9f76e32220ed9a90febb235.camel@scientia.org/
Reported-by: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 396294d1af ]
We're dumping the locked bitmap into the @checked_bitmap variable,
printing incorrect values during debug.
Thankfully even during my development I haven't hit a case where I need
to dump the locked bitmap. But for the sake of consistency, fix it by
dupping the locked bitmap into @locked_bitmap variable for output.
Fixes: 75258f20fb ("btrfs: subpage: dump extra subpage bitmaps for debug")
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c0def46dec ]
[WARNING]
There are several warnings about the recently introduced qgroup
auto-removal that it triggers WARN_ON() for the non-zero rfer/excl
numbers, e.g:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 67 PID: 2882 at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:1854 btrfs_remove_qgroup+0x3df/0x450
CPU: 67 UID: 0 PID: 2882 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.11.6-300.fc41.x86_64 #1
RIP: 0010:btrfs_remove_qgroup+0x3df/0x450
Call Trace:
<TASK>
btrfs_qgroup_cleanup_dropped_subvolume+0x97/0xc0
btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x44e/0xa80
btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xc3/0x110
cleaner_kthread+0xd8/0x130
kthread+0xd2/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
BTRFS warning (device sda): to be deleted qgroup 0/319 has non-zero numbers, rfer 258478080 rfer_cmpr 258478080 excl 0 excl_cmpr 0
[CAUSE]
Although the root cause is still unclear, as if qgroup is consistent a
fully dropped subvolume (with extra transaction committed) should lead
to all zero numbers for the qgroup.
My current guess is the subvolume drop triggered the new subtree drop
threshold thus marked qgroup inconsistent, then rescan cleared it but
some corner case is not properly handled during subvolume dropping.
But at least for this particular case, since it's only the rfer/excl not
properly reset to 0, and qgroup is already marked inconsistent, there is
nothing to be worried for the end users.
The user space tool utilizing qgroup would queue a rescan to handle
everything, so the kernel wanring is a little overkilled.
[ENHANCEMENT]
Enhance the warning inside btrfs_remove_qgroup() by:
- Only do WARN() if CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG is enabled
As explained the kernel can handle inconsistent qgroups by simply do a
rescan, there is nothing to bother the end users.
- Treat the reserved space leak the same as non-zero numbers
By outputting the values and trigger a WARN() if it's a debug build.
So far I haven't experienced any case related to reserved space so I
hope we will never need to bother them.
Fixes: 839d6ea4f8 ("btrfs: automatically remove the subvolume qgroup")
Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/922
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fe4de594f7 ]
Inside function get_canonical_dev_path(), we call d_path() to get the
final device path.
But d_path() can return error, and in that case the next strscpy() call
will trigger an invalid memory access.
Add back the missing error handling for d_path().
Reported-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Fixes: 7e06de7c83 ("btrfs: canonicalize the device path before adding it")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6aecd91a5c ]
[BUG]
Syzbot reported a crash with the following call trace:
BTRFS info (device loop0): scrub: started on devid 1
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000208
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 106e70067 P4D 106e70067 PUD 107143067 PMD 0
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 689 Comm: repro Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O 6.13.0-rc4-custom+ #206
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS unknown 02/02/2022
RIP: 0010:find_first_extent_item+0x26/0x1f0 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
scrub_find_fill_first_stripe+0x13d/0x3b0 [btrfs]
scrub_simple_mirror+0x175/0x260 [btrfs]
scrub_stripe+0x5d4/0x6c0 [btrfs]
scrub_chunk+0xbb/0x170 [btrfs]
scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x2f4/0x5f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_scrub_dev+0x240/0x600 [btrfs]
btrfs_ioctl+0x1dc8/0x2fa0 [btrfs]
? do_sys_openat2+0xa5/0xf0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x120
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
</TASK>
[CAUSE]
The reproducer is using a corrupted image where extent tree root is
corrupted, thus forcing to use "rescue=all,ro" mount option to mount the
image.
Then it triggered a scrub, but since scrub relies on extent tree to find
where the data/metadata extents are, scrub_find_fill_first_stripe()
relies on an non-empty extent root.
But unfortunately scrub_find_fill_first_stripe() doesn't really expect
an NULL pointer for extent root, it use extent_root to grab fs_info and
triggered a NULL pointer dereference.
[FIX]
Add an extra check for a valid extent root at the beginning of
scrub_find_fill_first_stripe().
The new error path is introduced by 42437a6386 ("btrfs: introduce
mount option rescue=ignorebadroots"), but that's pretty old, and later
commit b979547513 ("btrfs: scrub: introduce helper to find and fill
sector info for a scrub_stripe") changed how we do scrub.
So for kernels older than 6.6, the fix will need manual backport.
Reported-by: syzbot+339e9dbe3a2ca419b85d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/67756935.050a0220.25abdd.0a12.GAE@google.com/
Fixes: 42437a6386 ("btrfs: introduce mount option rescue=ignorebadroots")
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 30dac24e14 ]
Most of the callers of wbc_account_cgroup_owner() are converting a folio
to page before calling the function. wbc_account_cgroup_owner() is
converting the page back to a folio to call mem_cgroup_css_from_folio().
Convert wbc_account_cgroup_owner() to take a folio instead of a page,
and convert all callers to pass a folio directly except f2fs.
Convert the page to folio for all the callers from f2fs as they were the
only callers calling wbc_account_cgroup_owner() with a page. As f2fs is
already in the process of converting to folios, these call sites might
also soon be calling wbc_account_cgroup_owner() with a folio directly in
the future.
No functional changes. Only compile tested.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240926140121.203821-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 51d20d1dac ("iomap: fix zero padding data issue in concurrent append writes")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c7c97ceff9 ]
Commit e546fe1da9 ("block: Rework bio_split() return value") changed
bio_split() so that it can return errors.
Add error handling for it in btrfs_split_bio() and ultimately
btrfs_submit_chunk(). As the bio is not submitted, the bio counter must
be decremented to pair btrfs_bio_counter_inc_blocked().
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9a45022a0e ]
During swap activation we iterate over the extents of a file, then do
several checks for each extent, some of which may take some significant
time such as checking if an extent is shared. Since a file can have
many thousands of extents, this can be a very slow operation and it's
currently not interruptible. I had a bug during development of a previous
patch that resulted in an infinite loop when iterating the extents, so
a core was busy looping and I couldn't cancel the operation, which is very
annoying and requires a reboot. So make the loop interruptible by checking
for fatal signals at the end of each iteration and stopping immediately if
there is one.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6c3864e055 ]
Otherwise it won't catch bios turned into regular writes by the block
level zone write plugging. The additional test it adds is for emulated
zone append.
Fixes: 9b1ce7f0c6 ("block: Implement zone append emulation")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 3e74859ee3 upstream.
When we call btrfs_read_folio() to bring a folio uptodate, we unlock the
folio. The result of that is that a different thread can modify the
mapping (like remove it with invalidate) before we call folio_lock().
This results in an invalid page and we need to try again.
In particular, if we are relocating concurrently with aborting a
transaction, this can result in a crash like the following:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 76 PID: 1411631 Comm: kworker/u322:5
Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work
RIP: 0010:set_page_extent_mapped+0x20/0xb0
RSP: 0018:ffffc900516a7be8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: ffffea009e851d08 RBX: ffffea009e0b1880 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffc900516a7b90 RDI: ffffea009e0b1880
RBP: 0000000003573000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff88c07fd2f3f0
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000194754b575be R12: 0000000003572000
R13: 0000000003572fff R14: 0000000000100cca R15: 0000000005582fff
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88c07fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000407d00f002 CR4: 00000000007706f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die+0x78/0xc0
? page_fault_oops+0x2a8/0x3a0
? __switch_to+0x133/0x530
? wq_worker_running+0xa/0x40
? exc_page_fault+0x63/0x130
? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
? set_page_extent_mapped+0x20/0xb0
relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x1a7/0x940
relocate_data_extent+0xaf/0x120
relocate_block_group+0x20f/0x480
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x152/0x320
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x3d/0x120
btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work+0x2ae/0x4e0
process_scheduled_works+0x184/0x370
worker_thread+0xc6/0x3e0
? blk_add_timer+0xb0/0xb0
kthread+0xae/0xe0
? flush_tlb_kernel_range+0x90/0x90
ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40
? flush_tlb_kernel_range+0x90/0x90
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
</TASK>
This occurs because cleanup_one_transaction() calls
destroy_delalloc_inodes() which calls invalidate_inode_pages2() which
takes the folio_lock before setting mapping to NULL. We fail to check
this, and subsequently call set_extent_mapping(), which assumes that
mapping != NULL (in fact it asserts that in debug mode)
Note that the "fixes" patch here is not the one that introduced the
race (the very first iteration of this code from 2009) but a more recent
change that made this particular crash happen in practice.
Fixes: e7f1326cc2 ("btrfs: set page extent mapped after read_folio in relocate_one_page")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 0fba7be1ca upstream.
When we call btrfs_read_folio() we get an unlocked folio, so it is possible
for a different thread to concurrently modify folio->mapping. We must
check that this hasn't happened once we do have the lock.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 44f52bbe96 upstream.
When a COWing a tree block, at btrfs_cow_block(), and we have the
tracepoint trace_btrfs_cow_block() enabled and preemption is also enabled
(CONFIG_PREEMPT=y), we can trigger a use-after-free in the COWed extent
buffer while inside the tracepoint code. This is because in some paths
that call btrfs_cow_block(), such as btrfs_search_slot(), we are holding
the last reference on the extent buffer @buf so btrfs_force_cow_block()
drops the last reference on the @buf extent buffer when it calls
free_extent_buffer_stale(buf), which schedules the release of the extent
buffer with RCU. This means that if we are on a kernel with preemption,
the current task may be preempted before calling trace_btrfs_cow_block()
and the extent buffer already released by the time trace_btrfs_cow_block()
is called, resulting in a use-after-free.
Fix this by moving the trace_btrfs_cow_block() from btrfs_cow_block() to
btrfs_force_cow_block() before the COWed extent buffer is freed.
This also has a side effect of invoking the tracepoint in the tree defrag
code, at defrag.c:btrfs_realloc_node(), since btrfs_force_cow_block() is
called there, but this is fine and it was actually missing there.
Reported-by: syzbot+8517da8635307182c8a5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6759a9b9.050a0220.1ac542.000d.GAE@google.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit fca432e73d upstream.
The following sysfs entries are reading super block member directly,
which can have a different endian and cause wrong values:
- sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/nodesize
- sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/sectorsize
- sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/clone_alignment
Thankfully those values (nodesize and sectorsize) are always aligned
inside the btrfs_super_block, so it won't trigger unaligned read errors,
just endian problems.
Fix them by using the native cached members instead.
Fixes: df93589a17 ("btrfs: export more from FS_INFO to sysfs")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Qu Wenruo
Dave Chen
Josef Bacik
Johannes Thumshirn
Johannes Kimmel
Filipe Manana
Boris Burkov
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
Haoxiang Li
David Sterba
Koichiro Den
Hao-ran Zheng
Mikhail Zaslonko
Pankaj Raghav
Christoph Hellwig