mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/
synced 2026-10-16 22:39:48 +00:00
No description
- C 96.9%
- Assembly 0.9%
- Rust 0.6%
- Shell 0.6%
- Python 0.5%
- Other 0.3%
86e99b5bf2
Jakub Kicinski says:
====================
ethtool: netlink: handle SET intro/outro in the common code
Factor out the boilerplate code from SET handlers to common code.
I volunteered to refactor the extack in GET in a conversation
with Vladimir but I gave up.
The handling of failures during dump in GET handlers is a bit
unclear to me. Some code uses presence of info as indication
of dump and tries to avoid reporting errors altogether
(including extack messages).
There's also the question of whether we should have a validation
callback (similar to .set_validate here) for GET. It looks like
.parse_request was expected to perform the validation. It takes
the extack and tb directly, not via info:
int (*parse_request)(struct ethnl_req_info *req_info,
struct nlattr **tb,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
int (*prepare_data)(const struct ethnl_req_info *req_info,
struct ethnl_reply_data *reply_data,
struct genl_info *info);
so no crashes dereferencing info possible.
But .parse_request doesn't run under rtnl nor ethnl_ops_begin().
As a result some implementations defer validation until .prepare_data
where all the locks are held and they can call out to the driver.
All this makes me think that maybe we should refactor GET in the
same direction I'm refactoring SET. Split .prepare_data, take
more locks in the core, and add a validation helper which would
take extack directly:
- ret = ops->prepare_data(req_info, reply_data, info);
+ ret = ops->prepare_data_validate(req_info, reply_data, attrs, extack);
+ if (ret < 1) // if 0 -> skip for dump; -EOPNOTSUPP in do
+ goto err1;
+
+ ret = ethnl_ops_begin(dev);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err1;
+
+ ret = ops->prepare_data(req_info, reply_data); // no extack
+ ethnl_ops_complete(dev);
I'll file that away as a TODO for posterity / older me.
v2:
- invert checks for coalescing to avoid error code changes
- rebase and convert MM as well
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230121054430.642280-1-kuba@kernel.org/
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
History
|
|
|---|---|---|
| arch | ||
| block | ||
| certs | ||
| crypto | ||
| Documentation | ||
| drivers | ||
| fs | ||
| include | ||
| init | ||
| io_uring | ||
| ipc | ||
| kernel | ||
| lib | ||
| LICENSES | ||
| mm | ||
| net | ||
| rust | ||
| samples | ||
| scripts | ||
| security | ||
| sound | ||
| tools | ||
| usr | ||
| virt | ||
| .clang-format | ||
| .cocciconfig | ||
| .get_maintainer.ignore | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .mailmap | ||
| .rustfmt.toml | ||
| COPYING | ||
| CREDITS | ||
| Kbuild | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| MAINTAINERS | ||
| Makefile | ||
| README | ||
Linux kernel
============
There are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can
be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. Please read
Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst first.
In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or
``make pdfdocs``. The formatted documentation can also be read online at:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory,
several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation.
Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the
requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about
the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.