commit f51e2f1911 upstream.
Currently instruction_pointer() returns pt_regs->ret and so return value
is of type "long", which implicitly stands for "signed long".
While that's perfectly fine when dealing with 32-bit values if return
value of instruction_pointer() gets assigned to 64-bit variable sign
extension may happen.
And at least in one real use-case it happens already.
In perf_prepare_sample() return value of perf_instruction_pointer()
(which is an alias to instruction_pointer() in case of ARC) is assigned
to (struct perf_sample_data)->ip (which type is "u64").
And what we see if instuction pointer points to user-space application
that in case of ARC lays below 0x8000_0000 "ip" gets set properly with
leading 32 zeros. But if instruction pointer points to kernel address
space that starts from 0x8000_0000 then "ip" is set with 32 leadig
"f"-s. I.e. id instruction_pointer() returns 0x8100_0000, "ip" will be
assigned with 0xffff_ffff__8100_0000. Which is obviously wrong.
In particular that issuse broke output of perf, because perf was unable
to associate addresses like 0xffff_ffff__8100_0000 with anything from
/proc/kallsyms.
That's what we used to see:
----------->8----------
6.27% ls [unknown] [k] 0xffffffff8046c5cc
2.96% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] memcpy
2.25% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] memset
1.66% ls [unknown] [k] 0xffffffff80666536
1.54% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] 0x000224d6
1.18% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] 0x00022472
----------->8----------
With that change perf output looks much better now:
----------->8----------
8.21% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] memset
3.52% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] memcpy
2.11% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] malloc
1.88% ls libuClibc-0.9.34-git.so [.] memset
1.64% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
1.41% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __d_lookup_rcu
----------->8----------
Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
Cc: arc-linux-dev@synopsys.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
c7bc79956a