commit 8ce720d5bd upstream.
As reported, ever since commit 1013af4f58 ("mm/hugetlb: fix
huge_pmd_unshare() vs GUP-fast race") we can end up in some situations
where we perform so many IPI broadcasts when unsharing hugetlb PMD page
tables that it severely regresses some workloads.
In particular, when we fork()+exit(), or when we munmap() a large
area backed by many shared PMD tables, we perform one IPI broadcast per
unshared PMD table.
There are two optimizations to be had:
(1) When we process (unshare) multiple such PMD tables, such as during
exit(), it is sufficient to send a single IPI broadcast (as long as
we respect locking rules) instead of one per PMD table.
Locking prevents that any of these PMD tables could get reused before
we drop the lock.
(2) When we are not the last sharer (> 2 users including us), there is
no need to send the IPI broadcast. The shared PMD tables cannot
become exclusive (fully unshared) before an IPI will be broadcasted
by the last sharer.
Concurrent GUP-fast could walk into a PMD table just before we
unshared it. It could then succeed in grabbing a page from the
shared page table even after munmap() etc succeeded (and supressed
an IPI). But there is not difference compared to GUP-fast just
sleeping for a while after grabbing the page and re-enabling IRQs.
Most importantly, GUP-fast will never walk into page tables that are
no-longer shared, because the last sharer will issue an IPI
broadcast.
(if ever required, checking whether the PUD changed in GUP-fast
after grabbing the page like we do in the PTE case could handle
this)
So let's rework PMD sharing TLB flushing + IPI sync to use the mmu_gather
infrastructure so we can implement these optimizations and demystify the
code at least a bit. Extend the mmu_gather infrastructure to be able to
deal with our special hugetlb PMD table sharing implementation.
To make initialization of the mmu_gather easier when working on a single
VMA (in particular, when dealing with hugetlb), provide
tlb_gather_mmu_vma().
We'll consolidate the handling for (full) unsharing of PMD tables in
tlb_unshare_pmd_ptdesc() and tlb_flush_unshared_tables(), and track
in "struct mmu_gather" whether we had (full) unsharing of PMD tables.
Because locking is very special (concurrent unsharing+reuse must be
prevented), we disallow deferring flushing to tlb_finish_mmu() and instead
require an explicit earlier call to tlb_flush_unshared_tables().
From hugetlb code, we call huge_pmd_unshare_flush() where we make sure
that the expected lock protecting us from concurrent unsharing+reuse is
still held.
Check with a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() in tlb_finish_mmu() that
tlb_flush_unshared_tables() was properly called earlier.
Document it all properly.
Notes about tlb_remove_table_sync_one() interaction with unsharing:
There are two fairly tricky things:
(1) tlb_remove_table_sync_one() is a NOP on architectures without
CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE.
Here, the assumption is that the previous TLB flush would send an
IPI to all relevant CPUs. Careful: some architectures like x86 only
send IPIs to all relevant CPUs when tlb->freed_tables is set.
The relevant architectures should be selecting
MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE, but x86 might not do that in stable
kernels and it might have been problematic before this patch.
Also, the arch flushing behavior (independent of IPIs) is different
when tlb->freed_tables is set. Do we have to enlighten them to also
take care of tlb->unshared_tables? So far we didn't care, so
hopefully we are fine. Of course, we could be setting
tlb->freed_tables as well, but that might then unnecessarily flush
too much, because the semantics of tlb->freed_tables are a bit
fuzzy.
This patch changes nothing in this regard.
(2) tlb_remove_table_sync_one() is not a NOP on architectures with
CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE that actually don't need a sync.
Take x86 as an example: in the common case (!pv, !X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB)
we still issue IPIs during TLB flushes and don't actually need the
second tlb_remove_table_sync_one().
This optimized can be implemented on top of this, by checking e.g., in
tlb_remove_table_sync_one() whether we really need IPIs. But as
described in (1), it really must honor tlb->freed_tables then to
send IPIs to all relevant CPUs.
Notes on TLB flushing changes:
(1) Flushing for non-shared PMD tables
We're converting from flush_hugetlb_tlb_range() to
tlb_remove_huge_tlb_entry(). Given that we properly initialize the
MMU gather in tlb_gather_mmu_vma() to be hugetlb aware, similar to
__unmap_hugepage_range(), that should be fine.
(2) Flushing for shared PMD tables
We're converting from various things (flush_hugetlb_tlb_range(),
tlb_flush_pmd_range(), flush_tlb_range()) to tlb_flush_pmd_range().
tlb_flush_pmd_range() achieves the same that
tlb_remove_huge_tlb_entry() would achieve in these scenarios.
Note that tlb_remove_huge_tlb_entry() also calls
__tlb_remove_tlb_entry(), however that is only implemented on
powerpc, which does not support PMD table sharing.
Similar to (1), tlb_gather_mmu_vma() should make sure that TLB
flushing keeps on working as expected.
Further, note that the ptdesc_pmd_pts_dec() in huge_pmd_share() is not a
concern, as we are holding the i_mmap_lock the whole time, preventing
concurrent unsharing. That ptdesc_pmd_pts_dec() usage will be removed
separately as a cleanup later.
There are plenty more cleanups to be had, but they have to wait until
this is fixed.
[david@kernel.org: fix kerneldoc]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/f223dd74-331c-412d-93fc-69e360a5006c@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251223214037.580860-5-david@kernel.org
Fixes: 1013af4f58 ("mm/hugetlb: fix huge_pmd_unshare() vs GUP-fast race")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@kernel.org>
Reported-by: "Uschakow, Stanislav" <suschako@amazon.de>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/4d3878531c76479d9f8ca9789dc6485d@amazon.de/
Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Cc: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[ David: We don't have ptdesc and the wrappers, so work directly on
page->pt_share_count and pass "struct page" instead of "struct ptdesc".
CONFIG_HUGETLB_PMD_PAGE_TABLE_SHARING is still called
CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE and is set even without
CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE. We don't have 550a7d60bd ("mm, hugepages: add
mremap() support for hugepage backed vma"), so move_hugetlb_page_tables()
does not exist. We don't have 40549ba8f8 ("hugetlb: use new vma_lock
for pmd sharing synchronization") so changes in mm/rmap.c looks quite
different. We don't have 4ddb4d91b8 ("hugetlb: do not update address
in huge_pmd_unshare"), so huge_pmd_unshare() still gets a pointer to
an address. Some smaller contextual stuff. ]
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
ce4cf24761