Reference in a new issue

Blame

Copy permalink

Reference in a new issue

Copy permalink

Arjan van de Ven 14a3f40aaf x86: Remove STACKPROTECTOR_ALL ...

STACKPROTECTOR_ALL has a really high overhead (runtime and stack
footprint) and is not really worth it protection wise (the
normal STACKPROTECTOR is in effect for all functions with
buffers already), so lets just remove the option entirely.

Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091023073101.3dce4ebb@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

2009-10-23 16:35:23 +02:00

2094 lines

67 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History