linux/crypto/Kconfig

1785 lines
51 KiB

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 15:07:57 +01:00
async_tx: add the async_tx api The async_tx api provides methods for describing a chain of asynchronous bulk memory transfers/transforms with support for inter-transactional dependencies. It is implemented as a dmaengine client that smooths over the details of different hardware offload engine implementations. Code that is written to the api can optimize for asynchronous operation and the api will fit the chain of operations to the available offload resources. I imagine that any piece of ADMA hardware would register with the 'async_*' subsystem, and a call to async_X would be routed as appropriate, or be run in-line. - Neil Brown async_tx exploits the capabilities of struct dma_async_tx_descriptor to provide an api of the following general format: struct dma_async_tx_descriptor * async_<operation>(..., struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *depend_tx, dma_async_tx_callback cb_fn, void *cb_param) { struct dma_chan *chan = async_tx_find_channel(depend_tx, <operation>); struct dma_device *device = chan ? chan->device : NULL; int int_en = cb_fn ? 1 : 0; struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx = device ? device->device_prep_dma_<operation>(chan, len, int_en) : NULL; if (tx) { /* run <operation> asynchronously */ ... tx->tx_set_dest(addr, tx, index); ... tx->tx_set_src(addr, tx, index); ... async_tx_submit(chan, tx, flags, depend_tx, cb_fn, cb_param); } else { /* run <operation> synchronously */ ... <operation> ... async_tx_sync_epilog(flags, depend_tx, cb_fn, cb_param); } return tx; } async_tx_find_channel() returns a capable channel from its pool. The channel pool is organized as a per-cpu array of channel pointers. The async_tx_rebalance() routine is tasked with managing these arrays. In the uniprocessor case async_tx_rebalance() tries to spread responsibility evenly over channels of similar capabilities. For example if there are two copy+xor channels, one will handle copy operations and the other will handle xor. In the SMP case async_tx_rebalance() attempts to spread the operations evenly over the cpus, e.g. cpu0 gets copy channel0 and xor channel0 while cpu1 gets copy channel 1 and xor channel 1. When a dependency is specified async_tx_find_channel defaults to keeping the operation on the same channel. A xor->copy->xor chain will stay on one channel if it supports both operation types, otherwise the transaction will transition between a copy and a xor resource. Currently the raid5 implementation in the MD raid456 driver has been converted to the async_tx api. A driver for the offload engines on the Intel Xscale series of I/O processors, iop-adma, is provided in a later commit. With the iop-adma driver and async_tx, raid456 is able to offload copy, xor, and xor-zero-sum operations to hardware engines. On iop342 tiobench showed higher throughput for sequential writes (20 - 30% improvement) and sequential reads to a degraded array (40 - 55% improvement). For the other cases performance was roughly equal, +/- a few percentage points. On a x86-smp platform the performance of the async_tx implementation (in synchronous mode) was also +/- a few percentage points of the original implementation. According to 'top' on iop342 CPU utilization drops from ~50% to ~15% during a 'resync' while the speed according to /proc/mdstat doubles from ~25 MB/s to ~50 MB/s. The tiobench command line used for testing was: tiobench --size 2048 --block 4096 --block 131072 --dir /mnt/raid --numruns 5 * iop342 had 1GB of memory available Details: * if CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE=n the asynchronous path is compiled away by making async_tx_find_channel a static inline routine that always returns NULL * when a callback is specified for a given transaction an interrupt will fire at operation completion time and the callback will occur in a tasklet. if the the channel does not support interrupts then a live polling wait will be performed * the api is written as a dmaengine client that requests all available channels * In support of dependencies the api implicitly schedules channel-switch interrupts. The interrupt triggers the cleanup tasklet which causes pending operations to be scheduled on the next channel * Xor engines treat an xor destination address differently than a software xor routine. To the software routine the destination address is an implied source, whereas engines treat it as a write-only destination. This patch modifies the xor_blocks routine to take a an explicit destination address to mirror the hardware. Changelog: * fixed a leftover debug print * don't allow callbacks in async_interrupt_cond * fixed xor_block changes * fixed usage of ASYNC_TX_XOR_DROP_DEST * drop dma mapping methods, suggested by Chris Leech * printk warning fixups from Andrew Morton * don't use inline in C files, Adrian Bunk * select the API when MD is enabled * BUG_ON xor source counts <= 1 * implicitly handle hardware concerns like channel switching and interrupts, Neil Brown * remove the per operation type list, and distribute operation capabilities evenly amongst the available channels * simplify async_tx_find_channel to optimize the fast path * introduce the channel_table_initialized flag to prevent early calls to the api * reorganize the code to mimic crypto * include mm.h as not all archs include it in dma-mapping.h * make the Kconfig options non-user visible, Adrian Bunk * move async_tx under crypto since it is meant as 'core' functionality, and the two may share algorithms in the future * move large inline functions into c files * checkpatch.pl fixes * gpl v2 only correction Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Acked-By: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2007-01-02 11:10:44 -07:00
async_tx: add the async_tx api The async_tx api provides methods for describing a chain of asynchronous bulk memory transfers/transforms with support for inter-transactional dependencies. It is implemented as a dmaengine client that smooths over the details of different hardware offload engine implementations. Code that is written to the api can optimize for asynchronous operation and the api will fit the chain of operations to the available offload resources. I imagine that any piece of ADMA hardware would register with the 'async_*' subsystem, and a call to async_X would be routed as appropriate, or be run in-line. - Neil Brown async_tx exploits the capabilities of struct dma_async_tx_descriptor to provide an api of the following general format: struct dma_async_tx_descriptor * async_<operation>(..., struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *depend_tx, dma_async_tx_callback cb_fn, void *cb_param) { struct dma_chan *chan = async_tx_find_channel(depend_tx, <operation>); struct dma_device *device = chan ? chan->device : NULL; int int_en = cb_fn ? 1 : 0; struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx = device ? device->device_prep_dma_<operation>(chan, len, int_en) : NULL; if (tx) { /* run <operation> asynchronously */ ... tx->tx_set_dest(addr, tx, index); ... tx->tx_set_src(addr, tx, index); ... async_tx_submit(chan, tx, flags, depend_tx, cb_fn, cb_param); } else { /* run <operation> synchronously */ ... <operation> ... async_tx_sync_epilog(flags, depend_tx, cb_fn, cb_param); } return tx; } async_tx_find_channel() returns a capable channel from its pool. The channel pool is organized as a per-cpu array of channel pointers. The async_tx_rebalance() routine is tasked with managing these arrays. In the uniprocessor case async_tx_rebalance() tries to spread responsibility evenly over channels of similar capabilities. For example if there are two copy+xor channels, one will handle copy operations and the other will handle xor. In the SMP case async_tx_rebalance() attempts to spread the operations evenly over the cpus, e.g. cpu0 gets copy channel0 and xor channel0 while cpu1 gets copy channel 1 and xor channel 1. When a dependency is specified async_tx_find_channel defaults to keeping the operation on the same channel. A xor->copy->xor chain will stay on one channel if it supports both operation types, otherwise the transaction will transition between a copy and a xor resource. Currently the raid5 implementation in the MD raid456 driver has been converted to the async_tx api. A driver for the offload engines on the Intel Xscale series of I/O processors, iop-adma, is provided in a later commit. With the iop-adma driver and async_tx, raid456 is able to offload copy, xor, and xor-zero-sum operations to hardware engines. On iop342 tiobench showed higher throughput for sequential writes (20 - 30% improvement) and sequential reads to a degraded array (40 - 55% improvement). For the other cases performance was roughly equal, +/- a few percentage points. On a x86-smp platform the performance of the async_tx implementation (in synchronous mode) was also +/- a few percentage points of the original implementation. According to 'top' on iop342 CPU utilization drops from ~50% to ~15% during a 'resync' while the speed according to /proc/mdstat doubles from ~25 MB/s to ~50 MB/s. The tiobench command line used for testing was: tiobench --size 2048 --block 4096 --block 131072 --dir /mnt/raid --numruns 5 * iop342 had 1GB of memory available Details: * if CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE=n the asynchronous path is compiled away by making async_tx_find_channel a static inline routine that always returns NULL * when a callback is specified for a given transaction an interrupt will fire at operation completion time and the callback will occur in a tasklet. if the the channel does not support interrupts then a live polling wait will be performed * the api is written as a dmaengine client that requests all available channels * In support of dependencies the api implicitly schedules channel-switch interrupts. The interrupt triggers the cleanup tasklet which causes pending operations to be scheduled on the next channel * Xor engines treat an xor destination address differently than a software xor routine. To the software routine the destination address is an implied source, whereas engines treat it as a write-only destination. This patch modifies the xor_blocks routine to take a an explicit destination address to mirror the hardware. Changelog: * fixed a leftover debug print * don't allow callbacks in async_interrupt_cond * fixed xor_block changes * fixed usage of ASYNC_TX_XOR_DROP_DEST * drop dma mapping methods, suggested by Chris Leech * printk warning fixups from Andrew Morton * don't use inline in C files, Adrian Bunk * select the API when MD is enabled * BUG_ON xor source counts <= 1 * implicitly handle hardware concerns like channel switching and interrupts, Neil Brown * remove the per operation type list, and distribute operation capabilities evenly amongst the available channels * simplify async_tx_find_channel to optimize the fast path * introduce the channel_table_initialized flag to prevent early calls to the api * reorganize the code to mimic crypto * include mm.h as not all archs include it in dma-mapping.h * make the Kconfig options non-user visible, Adrian Bunk * move async_tx under crypto since it is meant as 'core' functionality, and the two may share algorithms in the future * move large inline functions into c files * checkpatch.pl fixes * gpl v2 only correction Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Acked-By: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2007-01-02 11:10:44 -07:00
async_tx: add the async_tx api The async_tx api provides methods for describing a chain of asynchronous bulk memory transfers/transforms with support for inter-transactional dependencies. It is implemented as a dmaengine client that smooths over the details of different hardware offload engine implementations. Code that is written to the api can optimize for asynchronous operation and the api will fit the chain of operations to the available offload resources. I imagine that any piece of ADMA hardware would register with the 'async_*' subsystem, and a call to async_X would be routed as appropriate, or be run in-line. - Neil Brown async_tx exploits the capabilities of struct dma_async_tx_descriptor to provide an api of the following general format: struct dma_async_tx_descriptor * async_<operation>(..., struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *depend_tx, dma_async_tx_callback cb_fn, void *cb_param) { struct dma_chan *chan = async_tx_find_channel(depend_tx, <operation>); struct dma_device *device = chan ? chan->device : NULL; int int_en = cb_fn ? 1 : 0; struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx = device ? device->device_prep_dma_<operation>(chan, len, int_en) : NULL; if (tx) { /* run <operation> asynchronously */ ... tx->tx_set_dest(addr, tx, index); ... tx->tx_set_src(addr, tx, index); ... async_tx_submit(chan, tx, flags, depend_tx, cb_fn, cb_param); } else { /* run <operation> synchronously */ ... <operation> ... async_tx_sync_epilog(flags, depend_tx, cb_fn, cb_param); } return tx; } async_tx_find_channel() returns a capable channel from its pool. The channel pool is organized as a per-cpu array of channel pointers. The async_tx_rebalance() routine is tasked with managing these arrays. In the uniprocessor case async_tx_rebalance() tries to spread responsibility evenly over channels of similar capabilities. For example if there are two copy+xor channels, one will handle copy operations and the other will handle xor. In the SMP case async_tx_rebalance() attempts to spread the operations evenly over the cpus, e.g. cpu0 gets copy channel0 and xor channel0 while cpu1 gets copy channel 1 and xor channel 1. When a dependency is specified async_tx_find_channel defaults to keeping the operation on the same channel. A xor->copy->xor chain will stay on one channel if it supports both operation types, otherwise the transaction will transition between a copy and a xor resource. Currently the raid5 implementation in the MD raid456 driver has been converted to the async_tx api. A driver for the offload engines on the Intel Xscale series of I/O processors, iop-adma, is provided in a later commit. With the iop-adma driver and async_tx, raid456 is able to offload copy, xor, and xor-zero-sum operations to hardware engines. On iop342 tiobench showed higher throughput for sequential writes (20 - 30% improvement) and sequential reads to a degraded array (40 - 55% improvement). For the other cases performance was roughly equal, +/- a few percentage points. On a x86-smp platform the performance of the async_tx implementation (in synchronous mode) was also +/- a few percentage points of the original implementation. According to 'top' on iop342 CPU utilization drops from ~50% to ~15% during a 'resync' while the speed according to /proc/mdstat doubles from ~25 MB/s to ~50 MB/s. The tiobench command line used for testing was: tiobench --size 2048 --block 4096 --block 131072 --dir /mnt/raid --numruns 5 * iop342 had 1GB of memory available Details: * if CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE=n the asynchronous path is compiled away by making async_tx_find_channel a static inline routine that always returns NULL * when a callback is specified for a given transaction an interrupt will fire at operation completion time and the callback will occur in a tasklet. if the the channel does not support interrupts then a live polling wait will be performed * the api is written as a dmaengine client that requests all available channels * In support of dependencies the api implicitly schedules channel-switch interrupts. The interrupt triggers the cleanup tasklet which causes pending operations to be scheduled on the next channel * Xor engines treat an xor destination address differently than a software xor routine. To the software routine the destination address is an implied source, whereas engines treat it as a write-only destination. This patch modifies the xor_blocks routine to take a an explicit destination address to mirror the hardware. Changelog: * fixed a leftover debug print * don't allow callbacks in async_interrupt_cond * fixed xor_block changes * fixed usage of ASYNC_TX_XOR_DROP_DEST * drop dma mapping methods, suggested by Chris Leech * printk warning fixups from Andrew Morton * don't use inline in C files, Adrian Bunk * select the API when MD is enabled * BUG_ON xor source counts <= 1 * implicitly handle hardware concerns like channel switching and interrupts, Neil Brown * remove the per operation type list, and distribute operation capabilities evenly amongst the available channels * simplify async_tx_find_channel to optimize the fast path * introduce the channel_table_initialized flag to prevent early calls to the api * reorganize the code to mimic crypto * include mm.h as not all archs include it in dma-mapping.h * make the Kconfig options non-user visible, Adrian Bunk * move async_tx under crypto since it is meant as 'core' functionality, and the two may share algorithms in the future * move large inline functions into c files * checkpatch.pl fixes * gpl v2 only correction Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Acked-By: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2007-01-02 11:10:44 -07:00
crypto: cryptd - Per-CPU thread implementation based on kcrypto_wq Original cryptd thread implementation has scalability issue, this patch solve the issue with a per-CPU thread implementation. struct cryptd_queue is defined to be a per-CPU queue, which holds one struct cryptd_cpu_queue for each CPU. In struct cryptd_cpu_queue, a struct crypto_queue holds all requests for the CPU, a struct work_struct is used to run all requests for the CPU. Testing based on dm-crypt on an Intel Core 2 E6400 (two cores) machine shows 19.2% performance gain. The testing script is as follow: -------------------- script begin --------------------------- #!/bin/sh dmc_create() { # Create a crypt device using dmsetup dmsetup create $2 --table "0 `blockdev --getsize $1` crypt cbc(aes-asm)?cryptd?plain:plain babebabebabebabebabebabebabebabe 0 $1 0" } dmsetup remove crypt0 dmsetup remove crypt1 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ram0 bs=1M count=4 >& /dev/null dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ram1 bs=1M count=4 >& /dev/null dmc_create /dev/ram0 crypt0 dmc_create /dev/ram1 crypt1 cat >tr.sh <<EOF #!/bin/sh for n in \$(seq 10); do dd if=/dev/dm-0 of=/dev/null >& /dev/null & dd if=/dev/dm-1 of=/dev/null >& /dev/null & done wait EOF for n in $(seq 10); do /usr/bin/time sh tr.sh done rm tr.sh -------------------- script end --------------------------- The separator of dm-crypt parameter is changed from "-" to "?", because "-" is used in some cipher driver name too, and cryptds need to specify cipher driver name instead of cipher name. The test result on an Intel Core2 E6400 (two cores) is as follow: without patch: -----------------wo begin -------------------------- 0.04user 0.38system 0:00.39elapsed 107%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6566minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.07user 0.35system 0:00.35elapsed 121%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6567minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.06user 0.34system 0:00.30elapsed 135%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6562minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.05user 0.37system 0:00.36elapsed 119%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6607minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.06user 0.36system 0:00.35elapsed 120%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6562minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.05user 0.37system 0:00.31elapsed 136%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6594minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.04user 0.34system 0:00.30elapsed 126%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6597minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.06user 0.32system 0:00.31elapsed 125%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6571minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.06user 0.34system 0:00.31elapsed 134%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6581minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.05user 0.38system 0:00.31elapsed 138%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6600minor)pagefaults 0swaps -----------------wo end -------------------------- with patch: ------------------w begin -------------------------- 0.02user 0.31system 0:00.24elapsed 141%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6554minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.05user 0.34system 0:00.31elapsed 127%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6606minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.07user 0.33system 0:00.26elapsed 155%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6559minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.07user 0.32system 0:00.26elapsed 151%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6562minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.05user 0.34system 0:00.26elapsed 150%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6603minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.03user 0.36system 0:00.31elapsed 124%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6562minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.04user 0.35system 0:00.26elapsed 147%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6586minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.03user 0.37system 0:00.27elapsed 146%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6562minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.04user 0.36system 0:00.26elapsed 154%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6594minor)pagefaults 0swaps 0.04user 0.35system 0:00.26elapsed 154%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+6557minor)pagefaults 0swaps ------------------w end -------------------------- The middle value of elapsed time is: wo cryptwq: 0.31 w cryptwq: 0.26 The performance gain is about (0.31-0.26)/0.26 = 0.192. Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2009-02-19 14:42:19 +08:00
crypto: poly1305 - Add a SSE2 SIMD variant for x86_64 Implements an x86_64 assembler driver for the Poly1305 authenticator. This single block variant holds the 130-bit integer in 5 32-bit words, but uses SSE to do two multiplications/additions in parallel. When calling updates with small blocks, the overhead for kernel_fpu_begin/ kernel_fpu_end() negates the perfmance gain. We therefore use the poly1305-generic fallback for small updates. For large messages, throughput increases by ~5-10% compared to poly1305-generic: testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-generic) test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 4080026 opers/sec, 391682496 bytes/sec test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 6221094 opers/sec, 597225024 bytes/sec test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9609750 opers/sec, 922536057 bytes/sec test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1459379 opers/sec, 420301267 bytes/sec test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2115179 opers/sec, 609171609 bytes/sec test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3729874 opers/sec, 1074203856 bytes/sec test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 593000 opers/sec, 626208000 bytes/sec test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1081536 opers/sec, 1142102332 bytes/sec test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 302077 opers/sec, 628320576 bytes/sec test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 554384 opers/sec, 1153120176 bytes/sec test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 278715 opers/sec, 1150536345 bytes/sec test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 140202 opers/sec, 1153022070 bytes/sec testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd) test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3790063 opers/sec, 363846076 bytes/sec test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5913378 opers/sec, 567684355 bytes/sec test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9352574 opers/sec, 897847104 bytes/sec test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1362145 opers/sec, 392297990 bytes/sec test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2007075 opers/sec, 578037628 bytes/sec test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3709811 opers/sec, 1068425798 bytes/sec test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 566272 opers/sec, 597984182 bytes/sec test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1111657 opers/sec, 1173910108 bytes/sec test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 288857 opers/sec, 600823808 bytes/sec test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 590746 opers/sec, 1228751888 bytes/sec test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 301825 opers/sec, 1245936902 bytes/sec test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 153075 opers/sec, 1258896201 bytes/sec Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T. Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2015-07-16 19:14:06 +02:00
crypto: poly1305 - Add a four block AVX2 variant for x86_64 Extends the x86_64 Poly1305 authenticator by a function processing four consecutive Poly1305 blocks in parallel using AVX2 instructions. For large messages, throughput increases by ~15-45% compared to two block SSE2: testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd) test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3809514 opers/sec, 365713411 bytes/sec test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5973423 opers/sec, 573448627 bytes/sec test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9446779 opers/sec, 906890803 bytes/sec test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1364814 opers/sec, 393066691 bytes/sec test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2045780 opers/sec, 589184697 bytes/sec test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3711946 opers/sec, 1069040592 bytes/sec test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 573686 opers/sec, 605812732 bytes/sec test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1647802 opers/sec, 1740079440 bytes/sec test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 292970 opers/sec, 609378224 bytes/sec test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 943229 opers/sec, 1961916528 bytes/sec test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 494623 opers/sec, 2041804569 bytes/sec test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 254045 opers/sec, 2089271014 bytes/sec testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd) test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3826224 opers/sec, 367317552 bytes/sec test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5948638 opers/sec, 571069267 bytes/sec test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9439110 opers/sec, 906154627 bytes/sec test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1367756 opers/sec, 393913872 bytes/sec test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2056881 opers/sec, 592381958 bytes/sec test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3711153 opers/sec, 1068812179 bytes/sec test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 574940 opers/sec, 607136745 bytes/sec test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1948830 opers/sec, 2057964585 bytes/sec test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 293308 opers/sec, 610082096 bytes/sec test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1235224 opers/sec, 2569267792 bytes/sec test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 684405 opers/sec, 2825226316 bytes/sec test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 367101 opers/sec, 3019039446 bytes/sec Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T. Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2015-07-16 19:14:08 +02:00
crypto: poly1305 - Add a SSE2 SIMD variant for x86_64 Implements an x86_64 assembler driver for the Poly1305 authenticator. This single block variant holds the 130-bit integer in 5 32-bit words, but uses SSE to do two multiplications/additions in parallel. When calling updates with small blocks, the overhead for kernel_fpu_begin/ kernel_fpu_end() negates the perfmance gain. We therefore use the poly1305-generic fallback for small updates. For large messages, throughput increases by ~5-10% compared to poly1305-generic: testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-generic) test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 4080026 opers/sec, 391682496 bytes/sec test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 6221094 opers/sec, 597225024 bytes/sec test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9609750 opers/sec, 922536057 bytes/sec test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1459379 opers/sec, 420301267 bytes/sec test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2115179 opers/sec, 609171609 bytes/sec test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3729874 opers/sec, 1074203856 bytes/sec test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 593000 opers/sec, 626208000 bytes/sec test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1081536 opers/sec, 1142102332 bytes/sec test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 302077 opers/sec, 628320576 bytes/sec test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 554384 opers/sec, 1153120176 bytes/sec test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 278715 opers/sec, 1150536345 bytes/sec test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 140202 opers/sec, 1153022070 bytes/sec testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd) test 0 ( 96 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 6 updates): 3790063 opers/sec, 363846076 bytes/sec test 1 ( 96 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 3 updates): 5913378 opers/sec, 567684355 bytes/sec test 2 ( 96 byte blocks, 96 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9352574 opers/sec, 897847104 bytes/sec test 3 ( 288 byte blocks, 16 bytes per update, 18 updates): 1362145 opers/sec, 392297990 bytes/sec test 4 ( 288 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 9 updates): 2007075 opers/sec, 578037628 bytes/sec test 5 ( 288 byte blocks, 288 bytes per update, 1 updates): 3709811 opers/sec, 1068425798 bytes/sec test 6 ( 1056 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 33 updates): 566272 opers/sec, 597984182 bytes/sec test 7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update, 1 updates): 1111657 opers/sec, 1173910108 bytes/sec test 8 ( 2080 byte blocks, 32 bytes per update, 65 updates): 288857 opers/sec, 600823808 bytes/sec test 9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update, 1 updates): 590746 opers/sec, 1228751888 bytes/sec test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update, 1 updates): 301825 opers/sec, 1245936902 bytes/sec test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update, 1 updates): 153075 opers/sec, 1258896201 bytes/sec Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T. Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2015-07-16 19:14:06 +02:00
crypto: sha1 - SSSE3 based SHA1 implementation for x86-64 This is an assembler implementation of the SHA1 algorithm using the Supplemental SSE3 (SSSE3) instructions or, when available, the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). Testing with the tcrypt module shows the raw hash performance is up to 2.3 times faster than the C implementation, using 8k data blocks on a Core 2 Duo T5500. For the smalest data set (16 byte) it is still 25% faster. Since this implementation uses SSE/YMM registers it cannot safely be used in every situation, e.g. while an IRQ interrupts a kernel thread. The implementation falls back to the generic SHA1 variant, if using the SSE/YMM registers is not possible. With this algorithm I was able to increase the throughput of a single IPsec link from 344 Mbit/s to 464 Mbit/s on a Core 2 Quad CPU using the SSSE3 variant -- a speedup of +34.8%. Saving and restoring SSE/YMM state might make the actual throughput fluctuate when there are FPU intensive userland applications running. For example, meassuring the performance using iperf2 directly on the machine under test gives wobbling numbers because iperf2 uses the FPU for each packet to check if the reporting interval has expired (in the above test I got min/max/avg: 402/484/464 MBit/s). Using this algorithm on a IPsec gateway gives much more reasonable and stable numbers, albeit not as high as in the directly connected case. Here is the result from an RFC 2544 test run with a EXFO Packet Blazer FTB-8510: frame size sha1-generic sha1-ssse3 delta 64 byte 37.5 MBit/s 37.5 MBit/s 0.0% 128 byte 56.3 MBit/s 62.5 MBit/s +11.0% 256 byte 87.5 MBit/s 100.0 MBit/s +14.3% 512 byte 131.3 MBit/s 150.0 MBit/s +14.2% 1024 byte 162.5 MBit/s 193.8 MBit/s +19.3% 1280 byte 175.0 MBit/s 212.5 MBit/s +21.4% 1420 byte 175.0 MBit/s 218.7 MBit/s +25.0% 1518 byte 150.0 MBit/s 181.2 MBit/s +20.8% The throughput for the largest frame size is lower than for the previous size because the IP packets need to be fragmented in this case to make there way through the IPsec tunnel. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Cc: Maxim Locktyukhin <maxim.locktyukhin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2011-08-04 20:19:25 +02:00
crypto: sha1 - SSSE3 based SHA1 implementation for x86-64 This is an assembler implementation of the SHA1 algorithm using the Supplemental SSE3 (SSSE3) instructions or, when available, the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). Testing with the tcrypt module shows the raw hash performance is up to 2.3 times faster than the C implementation, using 8k data blocks on a Core 2 Duo T5500. For the smalest data set (16 byte) it is still 25% faster. Since this implementation uses SSE/YMM registers it cannot safely be used in every situation, e.g. while an IRQ interrupts a kernel thread. The implementation falls back to the generic SHA1 variant, if using the SSE/YMM registers is not possible. With this algorithm I was able to increase the throughput of a single IPsec link from 344 Mbit/s to 464 Mbit/s on a Core 2 Quad CPU using the SSSE3 variant -- a speedup of +34.8%. Saving and restoring SSE/YMM state might make the actual throughput fluctuate when there are FPU intensive userland applications running. For example, meassuring the performance using iperf2 directly on the machine under test gives wobbling numbers because iperf2 uses the FPU for each packet to check if the reporting interval has expired (in the above test I got min/max/avg: 402/484/464 MBit/s). Using this algorithm on a IPsec gateway gives much more reasonable and stable numbers, albeit not as high as in the directly connected case. Here is the result from an RFC 2544 test run with a EXFO Packet Blazer FTB-8510: frame size sha1-generic sha1-ssse3 delta 64 byte 37.5 MBit/s 37.5 MBit/s 0.0% 128 byte 56.3 MBit/s 62.5 MBit/s +11.0% 256 byte 87.5 MBit/s 100.0 MBit/s +14.3% 512 byte 131.3 MBit/s 150.0 MBit/s +14.2% 1024 byte 162.5 MBit/s 193.8 MBit/s +19.3% 1280 byte 175.0 MBit/s 212.5 MBit/s +21.4% 1420 byte 175.0 MBit/s 218.7 MBit/s +25.0% 1518 byte 150.0 MBit/s 181.2 MBit/s +20.8% The throughput for the largest frame size is lower than for the previous size because the IP packets need to be fragmented in this case to make there way through the IPsec tunnel. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Cc: Maxim Locktyukhin <maxim.locktyukhin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2011-08-04 20:19:25 +02:00
crypto: sha1 - SSSE3 based SHA1 implementation for x86-64 This is an assembler implementation of the SHA1 algorithm using the Supplemental SSE3 (SSSE3) instructions or, when available, the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). Testing with the tcrypt module shows the raw hash performance is up to 2.3 times faster than the C implementation, using 8k data blocks on a Core 2 Duo T5500. For the smalest data set (16 byte) it is still 25% faster. Since this implementation uses SSE/YMM registers it cannot safely be used in every situation, e.g. while an IRQ interrupts a kernel thread. The implementation falls back to the generic SHA1 variant, if using the SSE/YMM registers is not possible. With this algorithm I was able to increase the throughput of a single IPsec link from 344 Mbit/s to 464 Mbit/s on a Core 2 Quad CPU using the SSSE3 variant -- a speedup of +34.8%. Saving and restoring SSE/YMM state might make the actual throughput fluctuate when there are FPU intensive userland applications running. For example, meassuring the performance using iperf2 directly on the machine under test gives wobbling numbers because iperf2 uses the FPU for each packet to check if the reporting interval has expired (in the above test I got min/max/avg: 402/484/464 MBit/s). Using this algorithm on a IPsec gateway gives much more reasonable and stable numbers, albeit not as high as in the directly connected case. Here is the result from an RFC 2544 test run with a EXFO Packet Blazer FTB-8510: frame size sha1-generic sha1-ssse3 delta 64 byte 37.5 MBit/s 37.5 MBit/s 0.0% 128 byte 56.3 MBit/s 62.5 MBit/s +11.0% 256 byte 87.5 MBit/s 100.0 MBit/s +14.3% 512 byte 131.3 MBit/s 150.0 MBit/s +14.2% 1024 byte 162.5 MBit/s 193.8 MBit/s +19.3% 1280 byte 175.0 MBit/s 212.5 MBit/s +21.4% 1420 byte 175.0 MBit/s 218.7 MBit/s +25.0% 1518 byte 150.0 MBit/s 181.2 MBit/s +20.8% The throughput for the largest frame size is lower than for the previous size because the IP packets need to be fragmented in this case to make there way through the IPsec tunnel. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Cc: Maxim Locktyukhin <maxim.locktyukhin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2011-08-04 20:19:25 +02:00
[CRYPTO] Add x86_64 asm AES Implementation: =============== The encrypt/decrypt code is based on an x86 implementation I did a while ago which I never published. This unpublished implementation does include an assembler based key schedule and precomputed tables. For simplicity and best acceptance, however, I took Gladman's in-kernel code for table generation and key schedule for the kernel port of my assembler code and modified this code to produce the key schedule as required by my assembler implementation. File locations and Kconfig are kept similar to the i586 AES assembler implementation. It may seem a little bit strange to use 32 bit I/O and registers in the assembler implementation but this gives the best code size. My implementation takes one instruction more per round compared to Gladman's x86 assembler but it doesn't require any stack for local variables or saved registers and it is less serialized than Gladman's code. Note that all comparisons to Gladman's code were done after my code was implemented. I did only use FIPS PUB 197 for the implementation so my implementation is independent work. If anybody has a better assembler solution for x86_64 I'll be pleased to have my code replaced with the better solution. Testing: ======== The implementation passes the in-kernel crypto testing module and I'm running it without any problems on my laptop where it is mainly used for dm-crypt. Microbenchmark: =============== The microbenchmark was done in userspace with similar compile flags as used during kernel compile. Encrypt/decrypt is about 35% faster than the generic C implementation. As the generic C as well as my assembler implementation are both table I don't really expect that there is much room for further improvements though I'll be glad to be corrected here. The key schedule is about 5% slower than the generic C implementation. This is due to the fact that some more work has to be done in the key schedule routine to fit the schedule to the assembler implementation. Code Size: ========== Encrypt and decrypt are together about 2.1 Kbytes smaller than the generic C implementation which is important with regard to L1 cache usage. The key schedule routine is about 100 bytes larger than the generic C implementation. Data Size: ========== There's no difference in data size requirements between the assembler implementation and the generic C implementation. License: ======== Gladmans's code is dual BSD/GPL whereas my assembler code is GPLv2 only (I'm not going to change the license for my code). So I had to change the module license for the x86_64 aes module from 'Dual BSD/GPL' to 'GPL' to reflect the most restrictive license within the module. Signed-off-by: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-07-06 13:55:00 -07:00
[CRYPTO] Add x86_64 asm AES Implementation: =============== The encrypt/decrypt code is based on an x86 implementation I did a while ago which I never published. This unpublished implementation does include an assembler based key schedule and precomputed tables. For simplicity and best acceptance, however, I took Gladman's in-kernel code for table generation and key schedule for the kernel port of my assembler code and modified this code to produce the key schedule as required by my assembler implementation. File locations and Kconfig are kept similar to the i586 AES assembler implementation. It may seem a little bit strange to use 32 bit I/O and registers in the assembler implementation but this gives the best code size. My implementation takes one instruction more per round compared to Gladman's x86 assembler but it doesn't require any stack for local variables or saved registers and it is less serialized than Gladman's code. Note that all comparisons to Gladman's code were done after my code was implemented. I did only use FIPS PUB 197 for the implementation so my implementation is independent work. If anybody has a better assembler solution for x86_64 I'll be pleased to have my code replaced with the better solution. Testing: ======== The implementation passes the in-kernel crypto testing module and I'm running it without any problems on my laptop where it is mainly used for dm-crypt. Microbenchmark: =============== The microbenchmark was done in userspace with similar compile flags as used during kernel compile. Encrypt/decrypt is about 35% faster than the generic C implementation. As the generic C as well as my assembler implementation are both table I don't really expect that there is much room for further improvements though I'll be glad to be corrected here. The key schedule is about 5% slower than the generic C implementation. This is due to the fact that some more work has to be done in the key schedule routine to fit the schedule to the assembler implementation. Code Size: ========== Encrypt and decrypt are together about 2.1 Kbytes smaller than the generic C implementation which is important with regard to L1 cache usage. The key schedule routine is about 100 bytes larger than the generic C implementation. Data Size: ========== There's no difference in data size requirements between the assembler implementation and the generic C implementation. License: ======== Gladmans's code is dual BSD/GPL whereas my assembler code is GPLv2 only (I'm not going to change the license for my code). So I had to change the module license for the x86_64 aes module from 'Dual BSD/GPL' to 'GPL' to reflect the most restrictive license within the module. Signed-off-by: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-07-06 13:55:00 -07:00
[CRYPTO] Add x86_64 asm AES Implementation: =============== The encrypt/decrypt code is based on an x86 implementation I did a while ago which I never published. This unpublished implementation does include an assembler based key schedule and precomputed tables. For simplicity and best acceptance, however, I took Gladman's in-kernel code for table generation and key schedule for the kernel port of my assembler code and modified this code to produce the key schedule as required by my assembler implementation. File locations and Kconfig are kept similar to the i586 AES assembler implementation. It may seem a little bit strange to use 32 bit I/O and registers in the assembler implementation but this gives the best code size. My implementation takes one instruction more per round compared to Gladman's x86 assembler but it doesn't require any stack for local variables or saved registers and it is less serialized than Gladman's code. Note that all comparisons to Gladman's code were done after my code was implemented. I did only use FIPS PUB 197 for the implementation so my implementation is independent work. If anybody has a better assembler solution for x86_64 I'll be pleased to have my code replaced with the better solution. Testing: ======== The implementation passes the in-kernel crypto testing module and I'm running it without any problems on my laptop where it is mainly used for dm-crypt. Microbenchmark: =============== The microbenchmark was done in userspace with similar compile flags as used during kernel compile. Encrypt/decrypt is about 35% faster than the generic C implementation. As the generic C as well as my assembler implementation are both table I don't really expect that there is much room for further improvements though I'll be glad to be corrected here. The key schedule is about 5% slower than the generic C implementation. This is due to the fact that some more work has to be done in the key schedule routine to fit the schedule to the assembler implementation. Code Size: ========== Encrypt and decrypt are together about 2.1 Kbytes smaller than the generic C implementation which is important with regard to L1 cache usage. The key schedule routine is about 100 bytes larger than the generic C implementation. Data Size: ========== There's no difference in data size requirements between the assembler implementation and the generic C implementation. License: ======== Gladmans's code is dual BSD/GPL whereas my assembler code is GPLv2 only (I'm not going to change the license for my code). So I had to change the module license for the x86_64 aes module from 'Dual BSD/GPL' to 'GPL' to reflect the most restrictive license within the module. Signed-off-by: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-07-06 13:55:00 -07:00
[CRYPTO] Add x86_64 asm AES Implementation: =============== The encrypt/decrypt code is based on an x86 implementation I did a while ago which I never published. This unpublished implementation does include an assembler based key schedule and precomputed tables. For simplicity and best acceptance, however, I took Gladman's in-kernel code for table generation and key schedule for the kernel port of my assembler code and modified this code to produce the key schedule as required by my assembler implementation. File locations and Kconfig are kept similar to the i586 AES assembler implementation. It may seem a little bit strange to use 32 bit I/O and registers in the assembler implementation but this gives the best code size. My implementation takes one instruction more per round compared to Gladman's x86 assembler but it doesn't require any stack for local variables or saved registers and it is less serialized than Gladman's code. Note that all comparisons to Gladman's code were done after my code was implemented. I did only use FIPS PUB 197 for the implementation so my implementation is independent work. If anybody has a better assembler solution for x86_64 I'll be pleased to have my code replaced with the better solution. Testing: ======== The implementation passes the in-kernel crypto testing module and I'm running it without any problems on my laptop where it is mainly used for dm-crypt. Microbenchmark: =============== The microbenchmark was done in userspace with similar compile flags as used during kernel compile. Encrypt/decrypt is about 35% faster than the generic C implementation. As the generic C as well as my assembler implementation are both table I don't really expect that there is much room for further improvements though I'll be glad to be corrected here. The key schedule is about 5% slower than the generic C implementation. This is due to the fact that some more work has to be done in the key schedule routine to fit the schedule to the assembler implementation. Code Size: ========== Encrypt and decrypt are together about 2.1 Kbytes smaller than the generic C implementation which is important with regard to L1 cache usage. The key schedule routine is about 100 bytes larger than the generic C implementation. Data Size: ========== There's no difference in data size requirements between the assembler implementation and the generic C implementation. License: ======== Gladmans's code is dual BSD/GPL whereas my assembler code is GPLv2 only (I'm not going to change the license for my code). So I had to change the module license for the x86_64 aes module from 'Dual BSD/GPL' to 'GPL' to reflect the most restrictive license within the module. Signed-off-by: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-07-06 13:55:00 -07:00
crypto: camellia - add assembler implementation for x86_64 Patch adds x86_64 assembler implementation of Camellia block cipher. Two set of functions are provided. First set is regular 'one-block at time' encrypt/decrypt functions. Second is 'two-block at time' functions that gain performance increase on out-of-order CPUs. Performance of 2-way functions should be equal to 1-way functions with in-order CPUs. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmark results: AMD Phenom II 1055T (fam:16, model:10): camellia-asm vs camellia_generic: 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.27x 1.22x 1.30x 1.42x 1.30x 1.34x 1.19x 1.05x 1.23x 1.24x 64B 1.74x 1.79x 1.43x 1.87x 1.81x 1.87x 1.48x 1.38x 1.55x 1.62x 256B 1.90x 1.87x 1.43x 1.94x 1.94x 1.95x 1.63x 1.62x 1.67x 1.70x 1024B 1.96x 1.93x 1.43x 1.95x 1.98x 2.01x 1.67x 1.69x 1.74x 1.80x 8192B 1.96x 1.96x 1.39x 1.93x 2.01x 2.03x 1.72x 1.64x 1.71x 1.76x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.23x 1.23x 1.33x 1.39x 1.34x 1.38x 1.04x 1.18x 1.21x 1.29x 64B 1.72x 1.69x 1.42x 1.78x 1.81x 1.89x 1.57x 1.52x 1.56x 1.65x 256B 1.85x 1.88x 1.42x 1.86x 1.93x 1.96x 1.69x 1.65x 1.70x 1.75x 1024B 1.88x 1.86x 1.45x 1.95x 1.96x 1.95x 1.77x 1.71x 1.77x 1.78x 8192B 1.91x 1.86x 1.42x 1.91x 2.03x 1.98x 1.73x 1.71x 1.78x 1.76x camellia-asm vs aes-asm (8kB block): 128bit 256bit ecb-enc 1.15x 1.22x ecb-dec 1.16x 1.16x cbc-enc 0.85x 0.90x cbc-dec 1.20x 1.23x ctr-enc 1.28x 1.30x ctr-dec 1.27x 1.28x lrw-enc 1.12x 1.16x lrw-dec 1.08x 1.10x xts-enc 1.11x 1.15x xts-dec 1.14x 1.15x Intel Core2 T8100 (fam:6, model:23, step:6): camellia-asm vs camellia_generic: 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.10x 1.12x 1.14x 1.16x 1.16x 1.15x 1.02x 1.02x 1.08x 1.08x 64B 1.61x 1.60x 1.17x 1.68x 1.67x 1.66x 1.43x 1.42x 1.44x 1.42x 256B 1.65x 1.73x 1.17x 1.77x 1.81x 1.80x 1.54x 1.53x 1.58x 1.54x 1024B 1.76x 1.74x 1.18x 1.80x 1.85x 1.85x 1.60x 1.59x 1.65x 1.60x 8192B 1.77x 1.75x 1.19x 1.81x 1.85x 1.86x 1.63x 1.61x 1.66x 1.62x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.10x 1.07x 1.13x 1.16x 1.11x 1.16x 1.03x 1.02x 1.08x 1.07x 64B 1.61x 1.62x 1.15x 1.66x 1.63x 1.68x 1.47x 1.46x 1.47x 1.44x 256B 1.71x 1.70x 1.16x 1.75x 1.69x 1.79x 1.58x 1.57x 1.59x 1.55x 1024B 1.78x 1.72x 1.17x 1.75x 1.80x 1.80x 1.63x 1.62x 1.65x 1.62x 8192B 1.76x 1.73x 1.17x 1.78x 1.80x 1.81x 1.64x 1.62x 1.68x 1.64x camellia-asm vs aes-asm (8kB block): 128bit 256bit ecb-enc 1.17x 1.21x ecb-dec 1.17x 1.20x cbc-enc 0.80x 0.82x cbc-dec 1.22x 1.24x ctr-enc 1.25x 1.26x ctr-dec 1.25x 1.26x lrw-enc 1.14x 1.18x lrw-dec 1.13x 1.17x xts-enc 1.14x 1.18x xts-dec 1.14x 1.17x Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-03-05 20:26:47 +02:00
crypto: camellia - add assembler implementation for x86_64 Patch adds x86_64 assembler implementation of Camellia block cipher. Two set of functions are provided. First set is regular 'one-block at time' encrypt/decrypt functions. Second is 'two-block at time' functions that gain performance increase on out-of-order CPUs. Performance of 2-way functions should be equal to 1-way functions with in-order CPUs. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmark results: AMD Phenom II 1055T (fam:16, model:10): camellia-asm vs camellia_generic: 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.27x 1.22x 1.30x 1.42x 1.30x 1.34x 1.19x 1.05x 1.23x 1.24x 64B 1.74x 1.79x 1.43x 1.87x 1.81x 1.87x 1.48x 1.38x 1.55x 1.62x 256B 1.90x 1.87x 1.43x 1.94x 1.94x 1.95x 1.63x 1.62x 1.67x 1.70x 1024B 1.96x 1.93x 1.43x 1.95x 1.98x 2.01x 1.67x 1.69x 1.74x 1.80x 8192B 1.96x 1.96x 1.39x 1.93x 2.01x 2.03x 1.72x 1.64x 1.71x 1.76x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.23x 1.23x 1.33x 1.39x 1.34x 1.38x 1.04x 1.18x 1.21x 1.29x 64B 1.72x 1.69x 1.42x 1.78x 1.81x 1.89x 1.57x 1.52x 1.56x 1.65x 256B 1.85x 1.88x 1.42x 1.86x 1.93x 1.96x 1.69x 1.65x 1.70x 1.75x 1024B 1.88x 1.86x 1.45x 1.95x 1.96x 1.95x 1.77x 1.71x 1.77x 1.78x 8192B 1.91x 1.86x 1.42x 1.91x 2.03x 1.98x 1.73x 1.71x 1.78x 1.76x camellia-asm vs aes-asm (8kB block): 128bit 256bit ecb-enc 1.15x 1.22x ecb-dec 1.16x 1.16x cbc-enc 0.85x 0.90x cbc-dec 1.20x 1.23x ctr-enc 1.28x 1.30x ctr-dec 1.27x 1.28x lrw-enc 1.12x 1.16x lrw-dec 1.08x 1.10x xts-enc 1.11x 1.15x xts-dec 1.14x 1.15x Intel Core2 T8100 (fam:6, model:23, step:6): camellia-asm vs camellia_generic: 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.10x 1.12x 1.14x 1.16x 1.16x 1.15x 1.02x 1.02x 1.08x 1.08x 64B 1.61x 1.60x 1.17x 1.68x 1.67x 1.66x 1.43x 1.42x 1.44x 1.42x 256B 1.65x 1.73x 1.17x 1.77x 1.81x 1.80x 1.54x 1.53x 1.58x 1.54x 1024B 1.76x 1.74x 1.18x 1.80x 1.85x 1.85x 1.60x 1.59x 1.65x 1.60x 8192B 1.77x 1.75x 1.19x 1.81x 1.85x 1.86x 1.63x 1.61x 1.66x 1.62x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.10x 1.07x 1.13x 1.16x 1.11x 1.16x 1.03x 1.02x 1.08x 1.07x 64B 1.61x 1.62x 1.15x 1.66x 1.63x 1.68x 1.47x 1.46x 1.47x 1.44x 256B 1.71x 1.70x 1.16x 1.75x 1.69x 1.79x 1.58x 1.57x 1.59x 1.55x 1024B 1.78x 1.72x 1.17x 1.75x 1.80x 1.80x 1.63x 1.62x 1.65x 1.62x 8192B 1.76x 1.73x 1.17x 1.78x 1.80x 1.81x 1.64x 1.62x 1.68x 1.64x camellia-asm vs aes-asm (8kB block): 128bit 256bit ecb-enc 1.17x 1.21x ecb-dec 1.17x 1.20x cbc-enc 0.80x 0.82x cbc-dec 1.22x 1.24x ctr-enc 1.25x 1.26x ctr-dec 1.25x 1.26x lrw-enc 1.14x 1.18x lrw-dec 1.13x 1.17x xts-enc 1.14x 1.18x xts-dec 1.14x 1.17x Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-03-05 20:26:47 +02:00
crypto: camellia - add assembler implementation for x86_64 Patch adds x86_64 assembler implementation of Camellia block cipher. Two set of functions are provided. First set is regular 'one-block at time' encrypt/decrypt functions. Second is 'two-block at time' functions that gain performance increase on out-of-order CPUs. Performance of 2-way functions should be equal to 1-way functions with in-order CPUs. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmark results: AMD Phenom II 1055T (fam:16, model:10): camellia-asm vs camellia_generic: 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.27x 1.22x 1.30x 1.42x 1.30x 1.34x 1.19x 1.05x 1.23x 1.24x 64B 1.74x 1.79x 1.43x 1.87x 1.81x 1.87x 1.48x 1.38x 1.55x 1.62x 256B 1.90x 1.87x 1.43x 1.94x 1.94x 1.95x 1.63x 1.62x 1.67x 1.70x 1024B 1.96x 1.93x 1.43x 1.95x 1.98x 2.01x 1.67x 1.69x 1.74x 1.80x 8192B 1.96x 1.96x 1.39x 1.93x 2.01x 2.03x 1.72x 1.64x 1.71x 1.76x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.23x 1.23x 1.33x 1.39x 1.34x 1.38x 1.04x 1.18x 1.21x 1.29x 64B 1.72x 1.69x 1.42x 1.78x 1.81x 1.89x 1.57x 1.52x 1.56x 1.65x 256B 1.85x 1.88x 1.42x 1.86x 1.93x 1.96x 1.69x 1.65x 1.70x 1.75x 1024B 1.88x 1.86x 1.45x 1.95x 1.96x 1.95x 1.77x 1.71x 1.77x 1.78x 8192B 1.91x 1.86x 1.42x 1.91x 2.03x 1.98x 1.73x 1.71x 1.78x 1.76x camellia-asm vs aes-asm (8kB block): 128bit 256bit ecb-enc 1.15x 1.22x ecb-dec 1.16x 1.16x cbc-enc 0.85x 0.90x cbc-dec 1.20x 1.23x ctr-enc 1.28x 1.30x ctr-dec 1.27x 1.28x lrw-enc 1.12x 1.16x lrw-dec 1.08x 1.10x xts-enc 1.11x 1.15x xts-dec 1.14x 1.15x Intel Core2 T8100 (fam:6, model:23, step:6): camellia-asm vs camellia_generic: 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.10x 1.12x 1.14x 1.16x 1.16x 1.15x 1.02x 1.02x 1.08x 1.08x 64B 1.61x 1.60x 1.17x 1.68x 1.67x 1.66x 1.43x 1.42x 1.44x 1.42x 256B 1.65x 1.73x 1.17x 1.77x 1.81x 1.80x 1.54x 1.53x 1.58x 1.54x 1024B 1.76x 1.74x 1.18x 1.80x 1.85x 1.85x 1.60x 1.59x 1.65x 1.60x 8192B 1.77x 1.75x 1.19x 1.81x 1.85x 1.86x 1.63x 1.61x 1.66x 1.62x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.10x 1.07x 1.13x 1.16x 1.11x 1.16x 1.03x 1.02x 1.08x 1.07x 64B 1.61x 1.62x 1.15x 1.66x 1.63x 1.68x 1.47x 1.46x 1.47x 1.44x 256B 1.71x 1.70x 1.16x 1.75x 1.69x 1.79x 1.58x 1.57x 1.59x 1.55x 1024B 1.78x 1.72x 1.17x 1.75x 1.80x 1.80x 1.63x 1.62x 1.65x 1.62x 8192B 1.76x 1.73x 1.17x 1.78x 1.80x 1.81x 1.64x 1.62x 1.68x 1.64x camellia-asm vs aes-asm (8kB block): 128bit 256bit ecb-enc 1.17x 1.21x ecb-dec 1.17x 1.20x cbc-enc 0.80x 0.82x cbc-dec 1.22x 1.24x ctr-enc 1.25x 1.26x ctr-dec 1.25x 1.26x lrw-enc 1.14x 1.18x lrw-dec 1.13x 1.17x xts-enc 1.14x 1.18x xts-dec 1.14x 1.17x Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-03-05 20:26:47 +02:00
crypto: camellia - add AES-NI/AVX/x86_64 assembler implementation of camellia cipher This patch adds AES-NI/AVX/x86_64 assembler implementation of Camellia block cipher. Implementation process data in sixteen block chunks, which are byte-sliced and AES SubBytes is reused for Camellia s-box with help of pre- and post-filtering. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. tcrypt test results: Intel Core i5-2450M: camellia-aesni-avx vs camellia-asm-x86_64-2way: 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.98x 0.96x 0.99x 0.96x 0.96x 0.95x 0.95x 0.94x 0.97x 0.98x 64B 0.99x 0.98x 1.00x 0.98x 0.98x 0.99x 0.98x 0.93x 0.99x 0.98x 256B 2.28x 2.28x 1.01x 2.29x 2.25x 2.24x 1.96x 1.97x 1.91x 1.90x 1024B 2.57x 2.56x 1.00x 2.57x 2.51x 2.53x 2.19x 2.17x 2.19x 2.22x 8192B 2.49x 2.49x 1.00x 2.53x 2.48x 2.49x 2.17x 2.17x 2.22x 2.22x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.97x 0.98x 0.99x 0.97x 0.97x 0.96x 0.97x 0.98x 0.98x 0.99x 64B 1.00x 1.00x 1.01x 0.99x 0.98x 0.99x 0.99x 0.99x 0.99x 0.99x 256B 2.37x 2.37x 1.01x 2.39x 2.35x 2.33x 2.10x 2.11x 1.99x 2.02x 1024B 2.58x 2.60x 1.00x 2.58x 2.56x 2.56x 2.28x 2.29x 2.28x 2.29x 8192B 2.50x 2.52x 1.00x 2.56x 2.51x 2.51x 2.24x 2.25x 2.26x 2.29x Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-10-26 14:49:01 +03:00
crypto: camellia - add AES-NI/AVX/x86_64 assembler implementation of camellia cipher This patch adds AES-NI/AVX/x86_64 assembler implementation of Camellia block cipher. Implementation process data in sixteen block chunks, which are byte-sliced and AES SubBytes is reused for Camellia s-box with help of pre- and post-filtering. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. tcrypt test results: Intel Core i5-2450M: camellia-aesni-avx vs camellia-asm-x86_64-2way: 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.98x 0.96x 0.99x 0.96x 0.96x 0.95x 0.95x 0.94x 0.97x 0.98x 64B 0.99x 0.98x 1.00x 0.98x 0.98x 0.99x 0.98x 0.93x 0.99x 0.98x 256B 2.28x 2.28x 1.01x 2.29x 2.25x 2.24x 1.96x 1.97x 1.91x 1.90x 1024B 2.57x 2.56x 1.00x 2.57x 2.51x 2.53x 2.19x 2.17x 2.19x 2.22x 8192B 2.49x 2.49x 1.00x 2.53x 2.48x 2.49x 2.17x 2.17x 2.22x 2.22x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.97x 0.98x 0.99x 0.97x 0.97x 0.96x 0.97x 0.98x 0.98x 0.99x 64B 1.00x 1.00x 1.01x 0.99x 0.98x 0.99x 0.99x 0.99x 0.99x 0.99x 256B 2.37x 2.37x 1.01x 2.39x 2.35x 2.33x 2.10x 2.11x 1.99x 2.02x 1024B 2.58x 2.60x 1.00x 2.58x 2.56x 2.56x 2.28x 2.29x 2.28x 2.29x 8192B 2.50x 2.52x 1.00x 2.56x 2.51x 2.51x 2.24x 2.25x 2.26x 2.29x Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-10-26 14:49:01 +03:00
crypto: camellia - add assembler implementation for x86_64 Patch adds x86_64 assembler implementation of Camellia block cipher. Two set of functions are provided. First set is regular 'one-block at time' encrypt/decrypt functions. Second is 'two-block at time' functions that gain performance increase on out-of-order CPUs. Performance of 2-way functions should be equal to 1-way functions with in-order CPUs. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmark results: AMD Phenom II 1055T (fam:16, model:10): camellia-asm vs camellia_generic: 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.27x 1.22x 1.30x 1.42x 1.30x 1.34x 1.19x 1.05x 1.23x 1.24x 64B 1.74x 1.79x 1.43x 1.87x 1.81x 1.87x 1.48x 1.38x 1.55x 1.62x 256B 1.90x 1.87x 1.43x 1.94x 1.94x 1.95x 1.63x 1.62x 1.67x 1.70x 1024B 1.96x 1.93x 1.43x 1.95x 1.98x 2.01x 1.67x 1.69x 1.74x 1.80x 8192B 1.96x 1.96x 1.39x 1.93x 2.01x 2.03x 1.72x 1.64x 1.71x 1.76x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.23x 1.23x 1.33x 1.39x 1.34x 1.38x 1.04x 1.18x 1.21x 1.29x 64B 1.72x 1.69x 1.42x 1.78x 1.81x 1.89x 1.57x 1.52x 1.56x 1.65x 256B 1.85x 1.88x 1.42x 1.86x 1.93x 1.96x 1.69x 1.65x 1.70x 1.75x 1024B 1.88x 1.86x 1.45x 1.95x 1.96x 1.95x 1.77x 1.71x 1.77x 1.78x 8192B 1.91x 1.86x 1.42x 1.91x 2.03x 1.98x 1.73x 1.71x 1.78x 1.76x camellia-asm vs aes-asm (8kB block): 128bit 256bit ecb-enc 1.15x 1.22x ecb-dec 1.16x 1.16x cbc-enc 0.85x 0.90x cbc-dec 1.20x 1.23x ctr-enc 1.28x 1.30x ctr-dec 1.27x 1.28x lrw-enc 1.12x 1.16x lrw-dec 1.08x 1.10x xts-enc 1.11x 1.15x xts-dec 1.14x 1.15x Intel Core2 T8100 (fam:6, model:23, step:6): camellia-asm vs camellia_generic: 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.10x 1.12x 1.14x 1.16x 1.16x 1.15x 1.02x 1.02x 1.08x 1.08x 64B 1.61x 1.60x 1.17x 1.68x 1.67x 1.66x 1.43x 1.42x 1.44x 1.42x 256B 1.65x 1.73x 1.17x 1.77x 1.81x 1.80x 1.54x 1.53x 1.58x 1.54x 1024B 1.76x 1.74x 1.18x 1.80x 1.85x 1.85x 1.60x 1.59x 1.65x 1.60x 8192B 1.77x 1.75x 1.19x 1.81x 1.85x 1.86x 1.63x 1.61x 1.66x 1.62x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.10x 1.07x 1.13x 1.16x 1.11x 1.16x 1.03x 1.02x 1.08x 1.07x 64B 1.61x 1.62x 1.15x 1.66x 1.63x 1.68x 1.47x 1.46x 1.47x 1.44x 256B 1.71x 1.70x 1.16x 1.75x 1.69x 1.79x 1.58x 1.57x 1.59x 1.55x 1024B 1.78x 1.72x 1.17x 1.75x 1.80x 1.80x 1.63x 1.62x 1.65x 1.62x 8192B 1.76x 1.73x 1.17x 1.78x 1.80x 1.81x 1.64x 1.62x 1.68x 1.64x camellia-asm vs aes-asm (8kB block): 128bit 256bit ecb-enc 1.17x 1.21x ecb-dec 1.17x 1.20x cbc-enc 0.80x 0.82x cbc-dec 1.22x 1.24x ctr-enc 1.25x 1.26x ctr-dec 1.25x 1.26x lrw-enc 1.14x 1.18x lrw-dec 1.13x 1.17x xts-enc 1.14x 1.18x xts-dec 1.14x 1.17x Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-03-05 20:26:47 +02:00
crypto: cast6 - add x86_64/avx assembler implementation This patch adds a x86_64/avx assembler implementation of the Cast6 block cipher. The implementation processes eight blocks in parallel (two 4 block chunk AVX operations). The table-lookups are done in general-purpose registers. For small blocksizes the functions from the generic module are called. A good performance increase is provided for blocksizes greater or equal to 128B. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmark results: Intel Core i5-2500 CPU (fam:6, model:42, step:7) cast6-avx-x86_64 vs. cast6-generic 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.97x 1.00x 1.01x 1.01x 0.99x 0.97x 0.98x 1.01x 0.96x 0.98x 64B 0.98x 0.99x 1.02x 1.01x 0.99x 1.00x 1.01x 0.99x 1.00x 0.99x 256B 1.77x 1.84x 0.99x 1.85x 1.77x 1.77x 1.70x 1.74x 1.69x 1.72x 1024B 1.93x 1.95x 0.99x 1.96x 1.93x 1.93x 1.84x 1.85x 1.89x 1.87x 8192B 1.91x 1.95x 0.99x 1.97x 1.95x 1.91x 1.86x 1.87x 1.93x 1.90x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.97x 0.99x 1.02x 1.01x 0.98x 0.99x 1.00x 1.00x 0.98x 0.98x 64B 0.98x 0.99x 1.01x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.01x 1.01x 0.97x 1.00x 256B 1.77x 1.83x 1.00x 1.86x 1.79x 1.78x 1.70x 1.76x 1.71x 1.69x 1024B 1.92x 1.95x 0.99x 1.96x 1.93x 1.93x 1.83x 1.86x 1.89x 1.87x 8192B 1.94x 1.95x 0.99x 1.97x 1.95x 1.95x 1.87x 1.87x 1.93x 1.91x Signed-off-by: Johannes Goetzfried <Johannes.Goetzfried@informatik.stud.uni-erlangen.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-07-11 19:38:57 +02:00
crypto: cast6 - add x86_64/avx assembler implementation This patch adds a x86_64/avx assembler implementation of the Cast6 block cipher. The implementation processes eight blocks in parallel (two 4 block chunk AVX operations). The table-lookups are done in general-purpose registers. For small blocksizes the functions from the generic module are called. A good performance increase is provided for blocksizes greater or equal to 128B. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmark results: Intel Core i5-2500 CPU (fam:6, model:42, step:7) cast6-avx-x86_64 vs. cast6-generic 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.97x 1.00x 1.01x 1.01x 0.99x 0.97x 0.98x 1.01x 0.96x 0.98x 64B 0.98x 0.99x 1.02x 1.01x 0.99x 1.00x 1.01x 0.99x 1.00x 0.99x 256B 1.77x 1.84x 0.99x 1.85x 1.77x 1.77x 1.70x 1.74x 1.69x 1.72x 1024B 1.93x 1.95x 0.99x 1.96x 1.93x 1.93x 1.84x 1.85x 1.89x 1.87x 8192B 1.91x 1.95x 0.99x 1.97x 1.95x 1.91x 1.86x 1.87x 1.93x 1.90x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.97x 0.99x 1.02x 1.01x 0.98x 0.99x 1.00x 1.00x 0.98x 0.98x 64B 0.98x 0.99x 1.01x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.01x 1.01x 0.97x 1.00x 256B 1.77x 1.83x 1.00x 1.86x 1.79x 1.78x 1.70x 1.76x 1.71x 1.69x 1024B 1.92x 1.95x 0.99x 1.96x 1.93x 1.93x 1.83x 1.86x 1.89x 1.87x 8192B 1.94x 1.95x 0.99x 1.97x 1.95x 1.95x 1.87x 1.87x 1.93x 1.91x Signed-off-by: Johannes Goetzfried <Johannes.Goetzfried@informatik.stud.uni-erlangen.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-07-11 19:38:57 +02:00
crypto: cast6 - add x86_64/avx assembler implementation This patch adds a x86_64/avx assembler implementation of the Cast6 block cipher. The implementation processes eight blocks in parallel (two 4 block chunk AVX operations). The table-lookups are done in general-purpose registers. For small blocksizes the functions from the generic module are called. A good performance increase is provided for blocksizes greater or equal to 128B. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmark results: Intel Core i5-2500 CPU (fam:6, model:42, step:7) cast6-avx-x86_64 vs. cast6-generic 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.97x 1.00x 1.01x 1.01x 0.99x 0.97x 0.98x 1.01x 0.96x 0.98x 64B 0.98x 0.99x 1.02x 1.01x 0.99x 1.00x 1.01x 0.99x 1.00x 0.99x 256B 1.77x 1.84x 0.99x 1.85x 1.77x 1.77x 1.70x 1.74x 1.69x 1.72x 1024B 1.93x 1.95x 0.99x 1.96x 1.93x 1.93x 1.84x 1.85x 1.89x 1.87x 8192B 1.91x 1.95x 0.99x 1.97x 1.95x 1.91x 1.86x 1.87x 1.93x 1.90x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.97x 0.99x 1.02x 1.01x 0.98x 0.99x 1.00x 1.00x 0.98x 0.98x 64B 0.98x 0.99x 1.01x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.01x 1.01x 0.97x 1.00x 256B 1.77x 1.83x 1.00x 1.86x 1.79x 1.78x 1.70x 1.76x 1.71x 1.69x 1024B 1.92x 1.95x 0.99x 1.96x 1.93x 1.93x 1.83x 1.86x 1.89x 1.87x 8192B 1.94x 1.95x 0.99x 1.97x 1.95x 1.95x 1.87x 1.87x 1.93x 1.91x Signed-off-by: Johannes Goetzfried <Johannes.Goetzfried@informatik.stud.uni-erlangen.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-07-11 19:38:57 +02:00
crypto: chacha20 - Add a SSSE3 SIMD variant for x86_64 Implements an x86_64 assembler driver for the ChaCha20 stream cipher. This single block variant works on a single state matrix using SSE instructions. It requires SSSE3 due the use of pshufb for efficient 8/16-bit rotate operations. For large messages, throughput increases by ~65% compared to chacha20-generic: testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-generic) encryption test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 45089207 operations in 10 seconds (721427312 bytes) test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 43839521 operations in 10 seconds (2805729344 bytes) test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 12702056 operations in 10 seconds (3251726336 bytes) test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 3371173 operations in 10 seconds (3452081152 bytes) test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 422468 operations in 10 seconds (3460857856 bytes) testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 43141886 operations in 10 seconds (690270176 bytes) test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46845874 operations in 10 seconds (2998135936 bytes) test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 18458512 operations in 10 seconds (4725379072 bytes) test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 5360533 operations in 10 seconds (5489185792 bytes) test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 692846 operations in 10 seconds (5675794432 bytes) Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T. Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2015-07-16 19:14:01 +02:00
crypto: chacha20 - Add a SSSE3 SIMD variant for x86_64 Implements an x86_64 assembler driver for the ChaCha20 stream cipher. This single block variant works on a single state matrix using SSE instructions. It requires SSSE3 due the use of pshufb for efficient 8/16-bit rotate operations. For large messages, throughput increases by ~65% compared to chacha20-generic: testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-generic) encryption test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 45089207 operations in 10 seconds (721427312 bytes) test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 43839521 operations in 10 seconds (2805729344 bytes) test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 12702056 operations in 10 seconds (3251726336 bytes) test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 3371173 operations in 10 seconds (3452081152 bytes) test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 422468 operations in 10 seconds (3460857856 bytes) testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 43141886 operations in 10 seconds (690270176 bytes) test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46845874 operations in 10 seconds (2998135936 bytes) test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 18458512 operations in 10 seconds (4725379072 bytes) test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 5360533 operations in 10 seconds (5489185792 bytes) test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 692846 operations in 10 seconds (5675794432 bytes) Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T. Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2015-07-16 19:14:01 +02:00
crypto: serpent - add 8-way parallel x86_64/SSE2 assembler implementation Patch adds x86_64/SSE2 assembler implementation of serpent cipher. Assembler functions crypt data in eigth block chunks (two 4 block chunk SSE2 operations in parallel to improve performance on out-of-order CPUs). Glue code is based on one from AES-NI implementation, so requests from irq context are redirected to cryptd. v2: - add missing include of linux/module.h (appearently crypto.h used to include module.h, which changed for 3.2 by commit 7c926402a7e8c9b279968fd94efec8700ba3859e) Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmarks results (serpent-sse2/serpent_generic speed ratios): AMD Phenom II 1055T (fam:16, model:10): size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec 16B 1.03x 1.01x 1.03x 1.05x 1.00x 0.99x 64B 1.00x 1.01x 1.02x 1.04x 1.02x 1.01x 256B 2.34x 2.41x 0.99x 2.43x 2.39x 2.40x 1024B 2.51x 2.57x 1.00x 2.59x 2.56x 2.56x 8192B 2.50x 2.54x 1.00x 2.55x 2.57x 2.57x Intel Celeron T1600 (fam:6, model:15, step:13): size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec 16B 0.97x 0.97x 1.01x 1.01x 1.01x 1.02x 64B 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.02x 1.01x 1.01x 256B 3.41x 3.35x 1.00x 3.39x 3.42x 3.44x 1024B 3.75x 3.72x 0.99x 3.74x 3.75x 3.75x 8192B 3.70x 3.68x 0.99x 3.68x 3.69x 3.69x Full output: http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/phenom-ii-1055t/serpent-generic.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/phenom-ii-1055t/serpent-sse2.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/celeron-t1600/serpent-generic.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/celeron-t1600/serpent-sse2.txt Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2011-11-09 16:26:25 +02:00
crypto: serpent - add 8-way parallel x86_64/SSE2 assembler implementation Patch adds x86_64/SSE2 assembler implementation of serpent cipher. Assembler functions crypt data in eigth block chunks (two 4 block chunk SSE2 operations in parallel to improve performance on out-of-order CPUs). Glue code is based on one from AES-NI implementation, so requests from irq context are redirected to cryptd. v2: - add missing include of linux/module.h (appearently crypto.h used to include module.h, which changed for 3.2 by commit 7c926402a7e8c9b279968fd94efec8700ba3859e) Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmarks results (serpent-sse2/serpent_generic speed ratios): AMD Phenom II 1055T (fam:16, model:10): size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec 16B 1.03x 1.01x 1.03x 1.05x 1.00x 0.99x 64B 1.00x 1.01x 1.02x 1.04x 1.02x 1.01x 256B 2.34x 2.41x 0.99x 2.43x 2.39x 2.40x 1024B 2.51x 2.57x 1.00x 2.59x 2.56x 2.56x 8192B 2.50x 2.54x 1.00x 2.55x 2.57x 2.57x Intel Celeron T1600 (fam:6, model:15, step:13): size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec 16B 0.97x 0.97x 1.01x 1.01x 1.01x 1.02x 64B 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.02x 1.01x 1.01x 256B 3.41x 3.35x 1.00x 3.39x 3.42x 3.44x 1024B 3.75x 3.72x 0.99x 3.74x 3.75x 3.75x 8192B 3.70x 3.68x 0.99x 3.68x 3.69x 3.69x Full output: http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/phenom-ii-1055t/serpent-generic.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/phenom-ii-1055t/serpent-sse2.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/celeron-t1600/serpent-generic.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/celeron-t1600/serpent-sse2.txt Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2011-11-09 16:26:25 +02:00
crypto: serpent - add 8-way parallel x86_64/SSE2 assembler implementation Patch adds x86_64/SSE2 assembler implementation of serpent cipher. Assembler functions crypt data in eigth block chunks (two 4 block chunk SSE2 operations in parallel to improve performance on out-of-order CPUs). Glue code is based on one from AES-NI implementation, so requests from irq context are redirected to cryptd. v2: - add missing include of linux/module.h (appearently crypto.h used to include module.h, which changed for 3.2 by commit 7c926402a7e8c9b279968fd94efec8700ba3859e) Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmarks results (serpent-sse2/serpent_generic speed ratios): AMD Phenom II 1055T (fam:16, model:10): size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec 16B 1.03x 1.01x 1.03x 1.05x 1.00x 0.99x 64B 1.00x 1.01x 1.02x 1.04x 1.02x 1.01x 256B 2.34x 2.41x 0.99x 2.43x 2.39x 2.40x 1024B 2.51x 2.57x 1.00x 2.59x 2.56x 2.56x 8192B 2.50x 2.54x 1.00x 2.55x 2.57x 2.57x Intel Celeron T1600 (fam:6, model:15, step:13): size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec 16B 0.97x 0.97x 1.01x 1.01x 1.01x 1.02x 64B 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.02x 1.01x 1.01x 256B 3.41x 3.35x 1.00x 3.39x 3.42x 3.44x 1024B 3.75x 3.72x 0.99x 3.74x 3.75x 3.75x 8192B 3.70x 3.68x 0.99x 3.68x 3.69x 3.69x Full output: http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/phenom-ii-1055t/serpent-generic.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/phenom-ii-1055t/serpent-sse2.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/celeron-t1600/serpent-generic.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/celeron-t1600/serpent-sse2.txt Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2011-11-09 16:26:25 +02:00
crypto: serpent - add 8-way parallel x86_64/SSE2 assembler implementation Patch adds x86_64/SSE2 assembler implementation of serpent cipher. Assembler functions crypt data in eigth block chunks (two 4 block chunk SSE2 operations in parallel to improve performance on out-of-order CPUs). Glue code is based on one from AES-NI implementation, so requests from irq context are redirected to cryptd. v2: - add missing include of linux/module.h (appearently crypto.h used to include module.h, which changed for 3.2 by commit 7c926402a7e8c9b279968fd94efec8700ba3859e) Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmarks results (serpent-sse2/serpent_generic speed ratios): AMD Phenom II 1055T (fam:16, model:10): size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec 16B 1.03x 1.01x 1.03x 1.05x 1.00x 0.99x 64B 1.00x 1.01x 1.02x 1.04x 1.02x 1.01x 256B 2.34x 2.41x 0.99x 2.43x 2.39x 2.40x 1024B 2.51x 2.57x 1.00x 2.59x 2.56x 2.56x 8192B 2.50x 2.54x 1.00x 2.55x 2.57x 2.57x Intel Celeron T1600 (fam:6, model:15, step:13): size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec 16B 0.97x 0.97x 1.01x 1.01x 1.01x 1.02x 64B 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.02x 1.01x 1.01x 256B 3.41x 3.35x 1.00x 3.39x 3.42x 3.44x 1024B 3.75x 3.72x 0.99x 3.74x 3.75x 3.75x 8192B 3.70x 3.68x 0.99x 3.68x 3.69x 3.69x Full output: http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/phenom-ii-1055t/serpent-generic.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/phenom-ii-1055t/serpent-sse2.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/celeron-t1600/serpent-generic.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/celeron-t1600/serpent-sse2.txt Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2011-11-09 16:26:25 +02:00
crypto: serpent - add x86_64/avx assembler implementation This patch adds a x86_64/avx assembler implementation of the Serpent block cipher. The implementation is very similar to the sse2 implementation and processes eight blocks in parallel. Because of the new non-destructive three operand syntax all move-instructions can be removed and therefore a little performance increase is provided. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmark results: Intel Core i5-2500 CPU (fam:6, model:42, step:7) serpent-avx-x86_64 vs. serpent-sse2-x86_64 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.03x 1.01x 1.01x 1.01x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.01x 64B 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 0.99x 1.00x 1.01x 1.00x 1.00x 256B 1.05x 1.03x 1.00x 1.02x 1.05x 1.06x 1.05x 1.02x 1.05x 1.02x 1024B 1.05x 1.02x 1.00x 1.02x 1.05x 1.06x 1.05x 1.03x 1.05x 1.02x 8192B 1.05x 1.02x 1.00x 1.02x 1.06x 1.06x 1.04x 1.03x 1.04x 1.02x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.01x 1.00x 1.01x 1.01x 1.00x 1.00x 0.99x 1.03x 1.01x 1.01x 64B 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.01x 1.00x 1.02x 256B 1.05x 1.02x 1.00x 1.02x 1.05x 1.02x 1.04x 1.05x 1.05x 1.02x 1024B 1.06x 1.02x 1.00x 1.02x 1.07x 1.06x 1.05x 1.04x 1.05x 1.02x 8192B 1.05x 1.02x 1.00x 1.02x 1.06x 1.06x 1.04x 1.05x 1.05x 1.02x serpent-avx-x86_64 vs aes-asm (8kB block): 128bit 256bit ecb-enc 1.26x 1.73x ecb-dec 1.20x 1.64x cbc-enc 0.33x 0.45x cbc-dec 1.24x 1.67x ctr-enc 1.32x 1.76x ctr-dec 1.32x 1.76x lrw-enc 1.20x 1.60x lrw-dec 1.15x 1.54x xts-enc 1.22x 1.64x xts-dec 1.17x 1.57x Signed-off-by: Johannes Goetzfried <Johannes.Goetzfried@informatik.stud.uni-erlangen.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-06-12 16:47:43 +08:00
crypto: serpent - add x86_64/avx assembler implementation This patch adds a x86_64/avx assembler implementation of the Serpent block cipher. The implementation is very similar to the sse2 implementation and processes eight blocks in parallel. Because of the new non-destructive three operand syntax all move-instructions can be removed and therefore a little performance increase is provided. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmark results: Intel Core i5-2500 CPU (fam:6, model:42, step:7) serpent-avx-x86_64 vs. serpent-sse2-x86_64 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.03x 1.01x 1.01x 1.01x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.01x 64B 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 0.99x 1.00x 1.01x 1.00x 1.00x 256B 1.05x 1.03x 1.00x 1.02x 1.05x 1.06x 1.05x 1.02x 1.05x 1.02x 1024B 1.05x 1.02x 1.00x 1.02x 1.05x 1.06x 1.05x 1.03x 1.05x 1.02x 8192B 1.05x 1.02x 1.00x 1.02x 1.06x 1.06x 1.04x 1.03x 1.04x 1.02x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 1.01x 1.00x 1.01x 1.01x 1.00x 1.00x 0.99x 1.03x 1.01x 1.01x 64B 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.00x 1.01x 1.00x 1.02x 256B 1.05x 1.02x 1.00x 1.02x 1.05x 1.02x 1.04x 1.05x 1.05x 1.02x 1024B 1.06x 1.02x 1.00x 1.02x 1.07x 1.06x 1.05x 1.04x 1.05x 1.02x 8192B 1.05x 1.02x 1.00x 1.02x 1.06x 1.06x 1.04x 1.05x 1.05x 1.02x serpent-avx-x86_64 vs aes-asm (8kB block): 128bit 256bit ecb-enc 1.26x 1.73x ecb-dec 1.20x 1.64x cbc-enc 0.33x 0.45x cbc-dec 1.24x 1.67x ctr-enc 1.32x 1.76x ctr-dec 1.32x 1.76x lrw-enc 1.20x 1.60x lrw-dec 1.15x 1.54x xts-enc 1.22x 1.64x xts-dec 1.17x 1.57x Signed-off-by: Johannes Goetzfried <Johannes.Goetzfried@informatik.stud.uni-erlangen.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-06-12 16:47:43 +08:00
crypto: twofish - add 3-way parallel x86_64 assembler implemention Patch adds 3-way parallel x86_64 assembly implementation of twofish as new module. New assembler functions crypt data in three blocks chunks, improving cipher performance on out-of-order CPUs. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Summary of the tcrypt benchmarks: Twofish 3-way-asm vs twofish asm (128bit 8kb block ECB) encrypt: 1.3x speed decrypt: 1.3x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs twofish asm (128bit 8kb block CBC) encrypt: 1.07x speed decrypt: 1.4x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs twofish asm (128bit 8kb block CTR) encrypt: 1.4x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs AES asm (128bit 8kb block ECB) encrypt: 1.0x speed decrypt: 1.0x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs AES asm (128bit 8kb block CBC) encrypt: 0.84x speed decrypt: 1.09x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs AES asm (128bit 8kb block CTR) encrypt: 1.15x speed Full output: http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/tcrypt-speed-twofish-3way-asm-x86_64.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/tcrypt-speed-twofish-asm-x86_64.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/tcrypt-speed-aes-asm-x86_64.txt Tests were run on: vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 16 model : 10 model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T Processor Also userspace test were run on: vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7330 @ 2.40GHz stepping : 11 Userspace test results: Encryption/decryption of twofish 3-way vs x86_64-asm on AMD Phenom II: encrypt: 1.27x decrypt: 1.25x Encryption/decryption of twofish 3-way vs x86_64-asm on Intel Xeon E7330: encrypt: 1.36x decrypt: 1.36x Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2011-09-26 16:47:25 +03:00
crypto: twofish - add 3-way parallel x86_64 assembler implemention Patch adds 3-way parallel x86_64 assembly implementation of twofish as new module. New assembler functions crypt data in three blocks chunks, improving cipher performance on out-of-order CPUs. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Summary of the tcrypt benchmarks: Twofish 3-way-asm vs twofish asm (128bit 8kb block ECB) encrypt: 1.3x speed decrypt: 1.3x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs twofish asm (128bit 8kb block CBC) encrypt: 1.07x speed decrypt: 1.4x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs twofish asm (128bit 8kb block CTR) encrypt: 1.4x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs AES asm (128bit 8kb block ECB) encrypt: 1.0x speed decrypt: 1.0x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs AES asm (128bit 8kb block CBC) encrypt: 0.84x speed decrypt: 1.09x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs AES asm (128bit 8kb block CTR) encrypt: 1.15x speed Full output: http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/tcrypt-speed-twofish-3way-asm-x86_64.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/tcrypt-speed-twofish-asm-x86_64.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/tcrypt-speed-aes-asm-x86_64.txt Tests were run on: vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 16 model : 10 model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T Processor Also userspace test were run on: vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7330 @ 2.40GHz stepping : 11 Userspace test results: Encryption/decryption of twofish 3-way vs x86_64-asm on AMD Phenom II: encrypt: 1.27x decrypt: 1.25x Encryption/decryption of twofish 3-way vs x86_64-asm on Intel Xeon E7330: encrypt: 1.36x decrypt: 1.36x Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2011-09-26 16:47:25 +03:00
crypto: twofish - add 3-way parallel x86_64 assembler implemention Patch adds 3-way parallel x86_64 assembly implementation of twofish as new module. New assembler functions crypt data in three blocks chunks, improving cipher performance on out-of-order CPUs. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Summary of the tcrypt benchmarks: Twofish 3-way-asm vs twofish asm (128bit 8kb block ECB) encrypt: 1.3x speed decrypt: 1.3x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs twofish asm (128bit 8kb block CBC) encrypt: 1.07x speed decrypt: 1.4x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs twofish asm (128bit 8kb block CTR) encrypt: 1.4x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs AES asm (128bit 8kb block ECB) encrypt: 1.0x speed decrypt: 1.0x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs AES asm (128bit 8kb block CBC) encrypt: 0.84x speed decrypt: 1.09x speed Twofish 3-way-asm vs AES asm (128bit 8kb block CTR) encrypt: 1.15x speed Full output: http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/tcrypt-speed-twofish-3way-asm-x86_64.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/tcrypt-speed-twofish-asm-x86_64.txt http://koti.mbnet.fi/axh/kernel/crypto/tcrypt-speed-aes-asm-x86_64.txt Tests were run on: vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 16 model : 10 model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1055T Processor Also userspace test were run on: vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7330 @ 2.40GHz stepping : 11 Userspace test results: Encryption/decryption of twofish 3-way vs x86_64-asm on AMD Phenom II: encrypt: 1.27x decrypt: 1.25x Encryption/decryption of twofish 3-way vs x86_64-asm on Intel Xeon E7330: encrypt: 1.36x decrypt: 1.36x Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2011-09-26 16:47:25 +03:00
crypto: twofish - add x86_64/avx assembler implementation This patch adds a x86_64/avx assembler implementation of the Twofish block cipher. The implementation processes eight blocks in parallel (two 4 block chunk AVX operations). The table-lookups are done in general-purpose registers. For small blocksizes the 3way-parallel functions from the twofish-x86_64-3way module are called. A good performance increase is provided for blocksizes greater or equal to 128B. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmark results: Intel Core i5-2500 CPU (fam:6, model:42, step:7) twofish-avx-x86_64 vs. twofish-x86_64-3way 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.96x 0.97x 1.00x 0.95x 0.97x 0.97x 0.96x 0.95x 0.95x 0.98x 64B 0.99x 0.99x 1.00x 0.99x 0.98x 0.98x 0.99x 0.98x 0.99x 0.98x 256B 1.20x 1.21x 1.00x 1.19x 1.15x 1.14x 1.19x 1.20x 1.18x 1.19x 1024B 1.29x 1.30x 1.00x 1.28x 1.23x 1.24x 1.26x 1.28x 1.26x 1.27x 8192B 1.31x 1.32x 1.00x 1.31x 1.25x 1.25x 1.28x 1.29x 1.28x 1.30x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.96x 0.96x 1.00x 0.96x 0.97x 0.98x 0.95x 0.95x 0.95x 0.96x 64B 1.00x 0.99x 1.00x 0.98x 0.98x 1.01x 0.98x 0.98x 0.98x 0.98x 256B 1.20x 1.21x 1.00x 1.21x 1.15x 1.15x 1.19x 1.20x 1.18x 1.19x 1024B 1.29x 1.30x 1.00x 1.28x 1.23x 1.23x 1.26x 1.27x 1.26x 1.27x 8192B 1.31x 1.33x 1.00x 1.31x 1.26x 1.26x 1.29x 1.29x 1.28x 1.30x twofish-avx-x86_64 vs aes-asm (8kB block): 128bit 256bit ecb-enc 1.19x 1.63x ecb-dec 1.18x 1.62x cbc-enc 0.75x 1.03x cbc-dec 1.23x 1.67x ctr-enc 1.24x 1.65x ctr-dec 1.24x 1.65x lrw-enc 1.15x 1.53x lrw-dec 1.14x 1.52x xts-enc 1.16x 1.56x xts-dec 1.16x 1.56x Signed-off-by: Johannes Goetzfried <Johannes.Goetzfried@informatik.stud.uni-erlangen.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-05-28 15:54:24 +02:00
crypto: twofish - add x86_64/avx assembler implementation This patch adds a x86_64/avx assembler implementation of the Twofish block cipher. The implementation processes eight blocks in parallel (two 4 block chunk AVX operations). The table-lookups are done in general-purpose registers. For small blocksizes the 3way-parallel functions from the twofish-x86_64-3way module are called. A good performance increase is provided for blocksizes greater or equal to 128B. Patch has been tested with tcrypt and automated filesystem tests. Tcrypt benchmark results: Intel Core i5-2500 CPU (fam:6, model:42, step:7) twofish-avx-x86_64 vs. twofish-x86_64-3way 128bit key: (lrw:256bit) (xts:256bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.96x 0.97x 1.00x 0.95x 0.97x 0.97x 0.96x 0.95x 0.95x 0.98x 64B 0.99x 0.99x 1.00x 0.99x 0.98x 0.98x 0.99x 0.98x 0.99x 0.98x 256B 1.20x 1.21x 1.00x 1.19x 1.15x 1.14x 1.19x 1.20x 1.18x 1.19x 1024B 1.29x 1.30x 1.00x 1.28x 1.23x 1.24x 1.26x 1.28x 1.26x 1.27x 8192B 1.31x 1.32x 1.00x 1.31x 1.25x 1.25x 1.28x 1.29x 1.28x 1.30x 256bit key: (lrw:384bit) (xts:512bit) size ecb-enc ecb-dec cbc-enc cbc-dec ctr-enc ctr-dec lrw-enc lrw-dec xts-enc xts-dec 16B 0.96x 0.96x 1.00x 0.96x 0.97x 0.98x 0.95x 0.95x 0.95x 0.96x 64B 1.00x 0.99x 1.00x 0.98x 0.98x 1.01x 0.98x 0.98x 0.98x 0.98x 256B 1.20x 1.21x 1.00x 1.21x 1.15x 1.15x 1.19x 1.20x 1.18x 1.19x 1024B 1.29x 1.30x 1.00x 1.28x 1.23x 1.23x 1.26x 1.27x 1.26x 1.27x 8192B 1.31x 1.33x 1.00x 1.31x 1.26x 1.26x 1.29x 1.29x 1.28x 1.30x twofish-avx-x86_64 vs aes-asm (8kB block): 128bit 256bit ecb-enc 1.19x 1.63x ecb-dec 1.18x 1.62x cbc-enc 0.75x 1.03x cbc-dec 1.23x 1.67x ctr-enc 1.24x 1.65x ctr-dec 1.24x 1.65x lrw-enc 1.15x 1.53x lrw-dec 1.14x 1.52x xts-enc 1.16x 1.56x xts-dec 1.16x 1.56x Signed-off-by: Johannes Goetzfried <Johannes.Goetzfried@informatik.stud.uni-erlangen.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
2012-05-28 15:54:24 +02:00