pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
Cc: Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
Cc: Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
51b35a454e ("sfc: skeleton EF100 PF driver") added a call to
pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting() in ef100_pci_remove().
Remove this call since there's no apparent reason to disable error
reporting when it was not previously enabled.
Note that since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core enables PCIe error reporting for all devices during
enumeration, so the driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Shahed Shaikh <shshaikh@marvell.com>
Cc: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
Cc: GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Ariel Elior <aelior@marvell.com>
Cc: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@marvell.com>
Cc: Abhijit Ayarekar <aayarekar@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Also note that the driver only called these for NX_IS_REVISION_P3 devices,
so since f26e58bf6f, error reporting has been enabled for devices other
than NX_IS_REVISION_P3.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
Cc: Rahul Verma <rahulv@marvell.com>
Cc: GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Dimitris Michailidis <dmichail@fungible.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Raju Rangoju <rajur@chelsio.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Ariel Elior <aelior@marvell.com>
Cc: Sudarsana Kalluru <skalluru@marvell.com>
Cc: Manish Chopra <manishc@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
cd709aa906 ("bnx2: Add PCI Advanced Error Reporting support.") added
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() for all devices, and c239f279e5 ("bnx2:
Enable AER on PCIE devices only") restricted it to BNX2_CHIP_5709 devices
to avoid an error message when it failed on non-PCIe devices. The PCI core
only enables PCIe error reporting on PCIe devices, which I assume means
BNX2_CHIP_5709.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Rasesh Mody <rmody@marvell.com>
Cc: GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com
Reviewed-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Cc: Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com>
Cc: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
Messages. Since f26e58bf6f ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration, so the
driver doesn't need to do it itself.
Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
driver. Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
from the driver .remove() path.
Note that this only controls ERR_* Messages from the device. An ERR_*
Message may cause the Root Port to generate an interrupt, depending on the
AER Root Error Command register managed by the AER service driver.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Chris Snook <chris.snook@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Jakub Kicinski says:
====================
tools: ynl: fix enum-as-flags in the generic CLI
The CLI needs to use proper classes when looking at Enum definitions
rather than interpreting the YAML spec ad-hoc, because we have more
than on format of the definition supported.
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308003923.445268-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Lorenzo points out that the generic CLI is broken for the netdev
family. When I added the support for documentation of enums
(and sparse enums) the client script was not updated.
It expects the values in enum to be a list of names,
now it can also be a dict (YAML object).
Reported-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Fixes: e4b48ed460 ("tools: ynl: add a completely generic client")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
R-Car H3 ES1.* was only available to an internal development group and
needed a lot of quirks and workarounds. These become a maintenance
burden now, so our development group decided to remove upstream support
and disable booting for this SoC. Public users only have ES2 onwards.
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230307163041.3815-8-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The MT7530 switch from the MT7621 SoC has 2 ports which can be set up as
internal: port 5 and 6. Arınç reports that the GMAC1 attached to port 5
receives corrupted frames, unless port 6 (attached to GMAC0) has been
brought up by the driver. This is true regardless of whether port 5 is
used as a user port or as a CPU port (carrying DSA tags).
Offline debugging (blind for me) which began in the linked thread showed
experimentally that the configuration done by the driver for port 6
contains a step which is needed by port 5 as well - the write to
CORE_GSWPLL_GRP2 (note that I've no idea as to what it does, apart from
the comment "Set core clock into 500Mhz"). Prints put by Arınç show that
the reset value of CORE_GSWPLL_GRP2 is RG_GSWPLL_POSDIV_500M(1) |
RG_GSWPLL_FBKDIV_500M(40) (0x128), both on the MCM MT7530 from the
MT7621 SoC, as well as on the standalone MT7530 from MT7623NI Bananapi
BPI-R2. Apparently, port 5 on the standalone MT7530 can work under both
values of the register, while on the MT7621 SoC it cannot.
The call path that triggers the register write is:
mt753x_phylink_mac_config() for port 6
-> mt753x_pad_setup()
-> mt7530_pad_clk_setup()
so this fully explains the behavior noticed by Arınç, that bringing port
6 up is necessary.
The simplest fix for the problem is to extract the register writes which
are needed for both port 5 and 6 into a common mt7530_pll_setup()
function, which is called at mt7530_setup() time, immediately after
switch reset. We can argue that this mirrors the code layout introduced
in mt7531_setup() by commit 42bc4fafe3 ("net: mt7531: only do PLL once
after the reset"), in that the PLL setup has the exact same positioning,
and further work to consolidate the separate setup() functions is not
hindered.
Testing confirms that:
- the slight reordering of writes to MT7530_P6ECR and to
CORE_GSWPLL_GRP1 / CORE_GSWPLL_GRP2 introduced by this change does not
appear to cause problems for the operation of port 6 on MT7621 and on
MT7623 (where port 5 also always worked)
- packets sent through port 5 are not corrupted anymore, regardless of
whether port 6 is enabled by phylink or not (or even present in the
device tree)
My algorithm for determining the Fixes: tag is as follows. Testing shows
that some logic from mt7530_pad_clk_setup() is needed even for port 5.
Prior to commit ca366d6c88 ("net: dsa: mt7530: Convert to PHYLINK
API"), a call did exist for all phy_is_pseudo_fixed_link() ports - so
port 5 included. That commit replaced it with a temporary "Port 5 is not
supported!" comment, and the following commit 38f790a805 ("net: dsa:
mt7530: Add support for port 5") replaced that comment with a
configuration procedure in mt7530_setup_port5() which was insufficient
for port 5 to work. I'm laying the blame on the patch that claimed
support for port 5, although one would have also needed the change from
commit c3b8e07909 ("net: dsa: mt7530: setup core clock even in TRGMII
mode") for the write to be performed completely independently from port
6's configuration.
Thanks go to Arınç for describing the problem, for debugging and for
testing.
Reported-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/f297c2c4-6e7c-57ac-2394-f6025d309b9d@arinc9.com/
Fixes: 38f790a805 ("net: dsa: mt7530: Add support for port 5")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307155411.868573-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Use MAC3 (RGMII4) with the NC-SI stack instead of as an MDIO PHY.
The OCP slot #0 and OCP slot #1 use a common BMC_NCSI signal, so we use
only one of them at a time. The OCP slot #0 will be enabled by PCA9539's
setting by default.
Enable the OCP Auxiliary Power during booting to make the NCSI feature
work.
Signed-off-by: Chanh Nguyen <chanh@os.amperecomputing.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228102820.18477-1-chanh@os.amperecomputing.com
Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Use the overflow-protected struct_size() helper macro to compute the
allocation size of the vop2 data structure.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Cc: Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230223013533.1707706-1-jacob.e.keller@intel.com
Andrii Nakryiko says:
====================
Add support for open-coded (aka inline) iterators in BPF world. This is a next
evolution of gradually allowing more powerful and less restrictive looping and
iteration capabilities to BPF programs.
We set up a framework for implementing all kinds of iterators (e.g., cgroup,
task, file, etc, iterators), but this patch set only implements numbers
iterator, which is used to implement ergonomic bpf_for() for-like construct
(see patches #4-#5). We also add bpf_for_each(), which is a generic
foreach-like construct that will work with any kind of open-coded iterator
implementation, as long as we stick with bpf_iter_<type>_{new,next,destroy}()
naming pattern (which we now enforce on the kernel side).
Patch #1 is preparatory refactoring for easier way to check for special kfunc
calls. Patch #2 is adding iterator kfunc registration and validation logic,
which is mostly independent from the rest of open-coded iterator logic, so is
separated out for easier reviewing.
The meat of verifier-side logic is in patch #3. Patch #4 implements numbers
iterator. I kept them separate to have clean reference for how to integrate
new iterator types (now even simpler to do than in v1 of this patch set).
Patch #5 adds bpf_for(), bpf_for_each(), and bpf_repeat() macros to
bpf_misc.h, and also adds yet another pyperf test variant, now with bpf_for()
loop. Patch #6 is verification tests, based on numbers iterator (as the only
available right now). Patch #7 actually tests runtime behavior of numbers
iterator.
Finally, with changes in v2, it's possible and trivial to implement custom
iterators completely in kernel modules, which we showcase and test by adding
a simple iterator returning same number a given number of times to
bpf_testmod. Patch #8 is where all this happens and is tested.
Most of the relevant details are in corresponding commit messages or code
comments.
v4->v5:
- fixing missed inner for() in is_iter_reg_valid_uninit, and fixed return
false (kernel test robot);
- typo fixes and comment/commit description improvements throughout the
patch set;
v3->v4:
- remove unused variable from is_iter_reg_valid_init (kernel test robot);
v2->v3:
- remove special kfunc leftovers for bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy};
- add iters/testmod_seq* to DENYLIST.s390x, it doesn't support kfuncs in
modules yet (CI);
v1->v2:
- rebased on latest, dropping previously landed preparatory patches;
- each iterator type now have its own `struct bpf_iter_<type>` which allows
each iterator implementation to use exactly as much stack space as
necessary, allowing to avoid runtime allocations (Alexei);
- reworked how iterator kfuncs are defined, no verifier changes are required
when adding new iterator type;
- added bpf_testmod-based iterator implementation;
- address the rest of feedback, comments, commit message adjustment, etc.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Implement a trivial iterator returning same specified integer value
N times as part of bpf_testmod kernel module. Add selftests to validate
everything works end to end.
We also reuse these tests as "verification-only" tests to validate that
kernel prints the state of custom kernel module-defined iterator correctly:
fp-16=iter_testmod_seq(ref_id=1,state=drained,depth=0)
"testmod_seq" part is an iterator type, and is coming from module's BTF
data dynamically at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-9-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add number iterator (bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy}()) tests,
validating the correct handling of various corner and common cases
*at runtime*.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-8-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add various tests for open-coded iterators. Some of them excercise
various possible coding patterns in C, some go down to low-level
assembly for more control over various conditions, especially invalid
ones.
We also make use of bpf_for(), bpf_for_each(), bpf_repeat() macros in
some of these tests.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add bpf_for_each(), bpf_for(), and bpf_repeat() macros that make writing
open-coded iterator-based loops much more convenient and natural. These
macros utilize cleanup attribute to ensure proper destruction of the
iterator and thanks to that manage to provide the ergonomics that is
very close to C language's for() construct. Typical loop would look like:
int i;
int arr[N];
bpf_for(i, 0, N) {
/* verifier will know that i >= 0 && i < N, so could be used to
* directly access array elements with no extra checks
*/
arr[i] = i;
}
bpf_repeat() is very similar, but it doesn't expose iteration number and
is meant as a simple "repeat action N times" loop:
bpf_repeat(N) { /* whatever, N times */ }
Note that `break` and `continue` statements inside the {} block work as
expected.
bpf_for_each() is a generalization over any kind of BPF open-coded
iterator allowing to use for-each-like approach instead of calling
low-level bpf_iter_<type>_{new,next,destroy}() APIs explicitly. E.g.:
struct cgroup *cg;
bpf_for_each(cgroup, cg, some, input, args) {
/* do something with each cg */
}
would call (not-yet-implemented) bpf_iter_cgroup_{new,next,destroy}()
functions to form a loop over cgroups, where `some, input, args` are
passed verbatim into constructor as
bpf_iter_cgroup_new(&it, some, input, args).
As a first demonstration, add pyperf variant based on the bpf_for() loop.
Also clean up a few tests that either included bpf_misc.h header
unnecessarily from the user-space, which is unsupported, or included it
before any common types are defined (and thus leading to unnecessary
compilation warnings, potentially).
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Implement the first open-coded iterator type over a range of integers.
It's public API consists of:
- bpf_iter_num_new() constructor, which accepts [start, end) range
(that is, start is inclusive, end is exclusive).
- bpf_iter_num_next() which will keep returning read-only pointer to int
until the range is exhausted, at which point NULL will be returned.
If bpf_iter_num_next() is kept calling after this, NULL will be
persistently returned.
- bpf_iter_num_destroy() destructor, which needs to be called at some
point to clean up iterator state. BPF verifier enforces that iterator
destructor is called at some point before BPF program exits.
Note that `start = end = X` is a valid combination to setup an empty
iterator. bpf_iter_num_new() will return 0 (success) for any such
combination.
If bpf_iter_num_new() detects invalid combination of input arguments, it
returns error, resets iterator state to, effectively, empty iterator, so
any subsequent call to bpf_iter_num_next() will keep returning NULL.
BPF verifier has no knowledge that returned integers are in the
[start, end) value range, as both `start` and `end` are not statically
known and enforced: they are runtime values.
While the implementation is pretty trivial, some care needs to be taken
to avoid overflows and underflows. Subsequent selftests will validate
correctness of [start, end) semantics, especially around extremes
(INT_MIN and INT_MAX).
Similarly to bpf_loop(), we enforce that no more than BPF_MAX_LOOPS can
be specified.
bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy}() is a logical evolution from bounded
BPF loops and bpf_loop() helper and is the basis for implementing
ergonomic BPF loops with no statically known or verified bounds.
Subsequent patches implement bpf_for() macro, demonstrating how this can
be wrapped into something that works and feels like a normal for() loop
in C language.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Teach verifier about the concept of the open-coded (or inline) iterators.
This patch adds generic iterator loop verification logic, new STACK_ITER
stack slot type to contain iterator state, and necessary kfunc plumbing
for iterator's constructor, destructor and next methods. Next patch
implements first specific iterator (numbers iterator for implementing
for() loop logic). Such split allows to have more focused commits for
verifier logic and separate commit that we could point later to
demonstrating what does it take to add a new kind of iterator.
Each kind of iterator has its own associated struct bpf_iter_<type>,
where <type> denotes a specific type of iterator. struct bpf_iter_<type>
state is supposed to live on BPF program stack, so there will be no way
to change its size later on without breaking backwards compatibility, so
choose wisely! But given this struct is specific to a given <type> of
iterator, this allows a lot of flexibility: simple iterators could be
fine with just one stack slot (8 bytes), like numbers iterator in the
next patch, while some other more complicated iterators might need way
more to keep their iterator state. Either way, such design allows to
avoid runtime memory allocations, which otherwise would be necessary if
we fixed on-the-stack size and it turned out to be too small for a given
iterator implementation.
The way BPF verifier logic is implemented, there are no artificial
restrictions on a number of active iterators, it should work correctly
using multiple active iterators at the same time. This also means you
can have multiple nested iteration loops. struct bpf_iter_<type>
reference can be safely passed to subprograms as well.
General flow is easiest to demonstrate with a simple example using
number iterator implemented in next patch. Here's the simplest possible
loop:
struct bpf_iter_num it;
int *v;
bpf_iter_num_new(&it, 2, 5);
while ((v = bpf_iter_num_next(&it))) {
bpf_printk("X = %d", *v);
}
bpf_iter_num_destroy(&it);
Above snippet should output "X = 2", "X = 3", "X = 4". Note that 5 is
exclusive and is not returned. This matches similar APIs (e.g., slices
in Go or Rust) that implement a range of elements, where end index is
non-inclusive.
In the above example, we see a trio of function:
- constructor, bpf_iter_num_new(), which initializes iterator state
(struct bpf_iter_num it) on the stack. If any of the input arguments
are invalid, constructor should make sure to still initialize it such
that subsequent bpf_iter_num_next() calls will return NULL. I.e., on
error, return error and construct empty iterator.
- next method, bpf_iter_num_next(), which accepts pointer to iterator
state and produces an element. Next method should always return
a pointer. The contract between BPF verifier is that next method will
always eventually return NULL when elements are exhausted. Once NULL is
returned, subsequent next calls should keep returning NULL. In the
case of numbers iterator, bpf_iter_num_next() returns a pointer to an int
(storage for this integer is inside the iterator state itself),
which can be dereferenced after corresponding NULL check.
- once done with the iterator, it's mandated that user cleans up its
state with the call to destructor, bpf_iter_num_destroy() in this
case. Destructor frees up any resources and marks stack space used by
struct bpf_iter_num as usable for something else.
Any other iterator implementation will have to implement at least these
three methods. It is enforced that for any given type of iterator only
applicable constructor/destructor/next are callable. I.e., verifier
ensures you can't pass number iterator state into, say, cgroup
iterator's next method.
It is important to keep the naming pattern consistent to be able to
create generic macros to help with BPF iter usability. E.g., one
of the follow up patches adds generic bpf_for_each() macro to bpf_misc.h
in selftests, which allows to utilize iterator "trio" nicely without
having to code the above somewhat tedious loop explicitly every time.
This is enforced at kfunc registration point by one of the previous
patches in this series.
At the implementation level, iterator state tracking for verification
purposes is very similar to dynptr. We add STACK_ITER stack slot type,
reserve necessary number of slots, depending on
sizeof(struct bpf_iter_<type>), and keep track of necessary extra state
in the "main" slot, which is marked with non-zero ref_obj_id. Other
slots are also marked as STACK_ITER, but have zero ref_obj_id. This is
simpler than having a separate "is_first_slot" flag.
Another big distinction is that STACK_ITER is *always refcounted*, which
simplifies implementation without sacrificing usability. So no need for
extra "iter_id", no need to anticipate reuse of STACK_ITER slots for new
constructors, etc. Keeping it simple here.
As far as the verification logic goes, there are two extensive comments:
in process_iter_next_call() and iter_active_depths_differ() explaining
some important and sometimes subtle aspects. Please refer to them for
details.
But from 10,000-foot point of view, next methods are the points of
forking a verification state, which are conceptually similar to what
verifier is doing when validating conditional jump. We branch out at
a `call bpf_iter_<type>_next` instruction and simulate two outcomes:
NULL (iteration is done) and non-NULL (new element is returned). NULL is
simulated first and is supposed to reach exit without looping. After
that non-NULL case is validated and it either reaches exit (for trivial
examples with no real loop), or reaches another `call bpf_iter_<type>_next`
instruction with the state equivalent to already (partially) validated
one. State equivalency at that point means we technically are going to
be looping forever without "breaking out" out of established "state
envelope" (i.e., subsequent iterations don't add any new knowledge or
constraints to the verifier state, so running 1, 2, 10, or a million of
them doesn't matter). But taking into account the contract stating that
iterator next method *has to* return NULL eventually, we can conclude
that loop body is safe and will eventually terminate. Given we validated
logic outside of the loop (NULL case), and concluded that loop body is
safe (though potentially looping many times), verifier can claim safety
of the overall program logic.
The rest of the patch is necessary plumbing for state tracking, marking,
validation, and necessary further kfunc plumbing to allow implementing
iterator constructor, destructor, and next methods.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Add ability to register kfuncs that implement BPF open-coded iterator
contract and enforce naming and function proto convention. Enforcement
happens at the time of kfunc registration and significantly simplifies
the rest of iterators logic in the verifier.
More details follow in subsequent patches, but we enforce the following
conditions.
All kfuncs (constructor, next, destructor) have to be named consistenly
as bpf_iter_<type>_{new,next,destroy}(), respectively. <type> represents
iterator type, and iterator state should be represented as a matching
`struct bpf_iter_<type>` state type. Also, all iter kfuncs should have
a pointer to this `struct bpf_iter_<type>` as the very first argument.
Additionally:
- Constructor, i.e., bpf_iter_<type>_new(), can have arbitrary extra
number of arguments. Return type is not enforced either.
- Next method, i.e., bpf_iter_<type>_next(), has to return a pointer
type and should have exactly one argument: `struct bpf_iter_<type> *`
(const/volatile/restrict and typedefs are ignored).
- Destructor, i.e., bpf_iter_<type>_destroy(), should return void and
should have exactly one argument, similar to the next method.
- struct bpf_iter_<type> size is enforced to be positive and
a multiple of 8 bytes (to fit stack slots correctly).
Such strictness and consistency allows to build generic helpers
abstracting important, but boilerplate, details to be able to use
open-coded iterators effectively and ergonomically (see bpf_for_each()
in subsequent patches). It also simplifies the verifier logic in some
places. At the same time, this doesn't hurt generality of possible
iterator implementations. Win-win.
Constructor kfunc is marked with a new KF_ITER_NEW flags, next method is
marked with KF_ITER_NEXT (and should also have KF_RET_NULL, of course),
while destructor kfunc is marked as KF_ITER_DESTROY.
Additionally, we add a trivial kfunc name validation: it should be
a valid non-NULL and non-empty string.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Factor out logic to fetch basic kfunc metadata based on struct bpf_insn.
This is not exactly short or trivial code to just copy/paste and this
information is sometimes necessary in other parts of the verifier logic.
Subsequent patches will rely on this to determine if an instruction is
a kfunc call to iterator next method.
No functional changes intended, including that verbose() warning
behavior when kfunc is not allowed for a particular program type.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The Rockchip PLL drivers are currently table based and support only
the most common pixelclocks. Discard all modes we cannot achieve
at all. Normally the desired pixelclocks have an exact match in the
PLL driver, nevertheless allow for a 0.1% error just in case.
Tested-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>
Tested-by: Dan Johansen <strit@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230118132213.2911418-4-s.hauer@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230216102447.582905-5-s.hauer@pengutronix.de
The driver checks if the pixel clock of the given mode matches an entry
in the mpll config table. At least for the Synopsys phy the frequencies
in the mpll table are meant as a frequency range up to which the entry
works, not as a frequency that must match the pixel clock. Return
MODE_OK when the pixelclock is smaller than one of the mpll frequencies
to allow for more display resolutions.
Limit this behaviour to the Synopsys phy at the moment and keep the
current behaviour of forcing exact pixelclock rates for the other phys
until it has been sorted out how and if the vendor specific phys work
with non standard clock rates.
Tested-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220926080435.259617-2-s.hauer@pengutronix.de
Tested-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Dan Johansen <strit@manjaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230118132213.2911418-2-s.hauer@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230216102447.582905-3-s.hauer@pengutronix.de
The different VOP variants support different maximum resolutions. Reject
resolutions that are not supported by a specific variant.
This hasn't been a problem in the upstream driver so far as 1920x1080
has been the maximum resolution supported by the HDMI driver and that
resolution is supported by all VOP variants. Now with higher resolutions
supported in the HDMI driver we have to limit the resolutions to the
ones supported by the VOP.
The actual maximum resolutions are taken from the Rockchip downstream
Kernel.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
[dropped the vdisplay > height check after talking to Sascha, as according to
the vendor code "Actually vop hardware has no output height limit"
(from vendor commit "drm/rockchip: vop: get rid of max_output.height check")
and the height-check broke the px30-minievb display]
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230216102447.582905-2-s.hauer@pengutronix.de
