If fw_context_save is defined by fw, driver can skip library reload on
d3 exit or reload library.
Signed-off-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/20231215083102.3064200-4-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Driver queries fw_context_save feature when fw is ready and can skip
library reload with this feature since library is saved in persistent
memory. The default value of fw_context_save is true unless fw reports
false.
Signed-off-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://msgid.link/r/20231215083102.3064200-3-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
When compiling with gcc version 14.0.0 20231206 (experimental)
and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, I've noticed the following warning:
...
In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk',
inlined from '__ffs_func_bind_do_os_desc' at drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c:2934:3:
./include/linux/fortify-string.h:588:25: warning: call to '__read_overflow2_field'
declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd parameter);
maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning]
588 | __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This call to 'memcpy()' is interpreted as an attempt to copy both
'CompatibleID' and 'SubCompatibleID' of 'struct usb_ext_compat_desc'
from an address of the first one, which causes an overread warning.
Since we actually want to copy both of them at once, use the
convenient 'struct_group()' and 'sizeof_field()' here.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214090428.27292-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Since snprintf() has the documented, but still rather strange trait of
returning the length of the data that *would have been* written to the
array if space were available, rather than the arguably more useful
length of data *actually* written, it is usually considered wise to use
something else instead in order to avoid confusion.
In the case of sysfs call-backs, new wrappers exist that do just that.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: <usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213164246.1021885-13-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Since snprintf() has the documented, but still rather strange trait of
returning the length of the data that *would have been* written to the
array if space were available, rather than the arguably more useful
length of data *actually* written, it is usually considered wise to use
something else instead in order to avoid confusion.
In the case of sysfs call-backs, new wrappers exist that do just that.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105
Cc: Hema HK <hemahk@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213164246.1021885-12-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that {v}snprintf()
returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the destination
array. However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf() really returns
the length of the data that *would have been* written if there were
enough space for it. This misunderstanding has led to buffer-overruns
in the past. It's generally considered safer to use the {v}scnprintf()
variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple cases). So let's
do that.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213164246.1021885-11-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that {v}snprintf()
returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the destination
array. However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf() really returns
the length of the data that *would have been* written if there were
enough space for it. This misunderstanding has led to buffer-overruns
in the past. It's generally considered safer to use the {v}scnprintf()
variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple cases). So let's
do that.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213164246.1021885-10-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that {v}snprintf()
returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the destination
array. However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf() really returns
the length of the data that *would have been* written if there were
enough space for it. This misunderstanding has led to buffer-overruns
in the past. It's generally considered safer to use the {v}scnprintf()
variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple cases). So let's
do that.
Whilst we're at it, let's define some magic numbers to increase
readability and ease of maintenance.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105
Cc: Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213164246.1021885-9-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that {v}snprintf()
returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the destination
array. However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf() really returns
the length of the data that *would have been* written if there were
enough space for it. This misunderstanding has led to buffer-overruns
in the past. It's generally considered safer to use the {v}scnprintf()
variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple cases). So let's
do that.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105
Cc: Cristian Birsan <cristian.birsan@microchip.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213164246.1021885-8-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that {v}snprintf()
returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the destination
array. However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf() really returns
the length of the data that *would have been* written if there were
enough space for it. This misunderstanding has led to buffer-overruns
in the past. It's generally considered safer to use the {v}scnprintf()
variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple cases). So let's
do that.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105
Cc: Pawel Laszczak <pawell@cadence.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213164246.1021885-7-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that {v}snprintf()
returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the destination
array. However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf() really returns
the length of the data that *would have been* written if there were
enough space for it. This misunderstanding has led to buffer-overruns
in the past. It's generally considered safer to use the {v}scnprintf()
variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple cases). So let's
do that.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105
Cc: Cristian Birsan <cristian.birsan@microchip.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213164246.1021885-6-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that {v}snprintf()
returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the destination
array. However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf() really returns
the length of the data that *would have been* written if there were
enough space for it. This misunderstanding has led to buffer-overruns
in the past. It's generally considered safer to use the {v}scnprintf()
variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple cases). So let's
do that.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzejtp2010@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213164246.1021885-5-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that {v}snprintf()
returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the destination
array. However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf() really returns
the length of the data that *would have been* written if there were
enough space for it. This misunderstanding has led to buffer-overruns
in the past. It's generally considered safer to use the {v}scnprintf()
variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple cases). So let's
do that.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105
Cc: James Gruber <jimmyjgruber@gmail.com>
Cc: Yadwinder Singh <yadi.brar01@gmail.com>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Cc: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213164246.1021885-4-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that {v}snprintf()
returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the destination
array. However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf() really returns
the length of the data that *would have been* written if there were
enough space for it. This misunderstanding has led to buffer-overruns
in the past. It's generally considered safer to use the {v}scnprintf()
variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple cases). So let's
do that.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105
Cc: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@gmail.com>
Cc: Julian Scheel <julian@jusst.de>
Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213164246.1021885-3-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that {v}snprintf()
returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the destination
array. However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf() really returns
the length of the data that *would have been* written if there were
enough space for it. This misunderstanding has led to buffer-overruns
in the past. It's generally considered safer to use the {v}scnprintf()
variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple cases). So let's
do that.
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/69419/
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/105
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213164246.1021885-2-lee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Qualcomm WCD9390/WCD9395 is a standalone Hi-Fi audio codec IC with a
functionally separate USB SubSystem for Altmode/Analog Audio Switch
accessible over an I2C interface.
It provides switching USB-C USB2.0 lines between USB and Audio Headphones
speaker lines, and the USB-C SBU lines between DisplayPort AUX and Audio
Headphones Microphone/Ground.
The Audio Headphone and Microphone data path between the Codec and the
USB-C Mux subsystems are external to the IC, thus requiring DT
port-endpoint graph description to handle USB-C altmode & orientation
switching for Audio Accessory Mode.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212-topic-sm8650-upstream-wcd939x-usbss-v2-2-38961fea5867@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Document the Qualcomm WCD9390/WCD9395 USB SubSystem Altmode/Analog Audio Switch
which is a separate USB SubSystem for Altmode/Analog Audio Switch accessible
over an I2C interface.
Since Audio Headphone and Microphone data path between the Codec and the USB-C Mux
subsystems are external to the IC, it requires a second port to handle USB-C altmode
& orientation switching for Audio Accessory Mode to the Codec SubSystem.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231212-topic-sm8650-upstream-wcd939x-usbss-v2-1-38961fea5867@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
It's possible that usb_choose_configuration() can get called when a
USB device has no driver. In this case the recent commit a87b8e3be9
("usb: core: Allow subclassed USB drivers to override
usb_choose_configuration()") can cause a crash since it dereferenced
the driver structure without checking for NULL. Let's add a check.
A USB device with no driver is an anomaly, so make
usb_choose_configuration() return immediately if there is no driver.
This was seen in the real world when usbguard got ahold of a r8152
device at the wrong time. It can also be simulated via this on a
computer with one r8152-based USB Ethernet adapter:
cd /sys/bus/usb/drivers/r8152-cfgselector
to_unbind="$(ls -d *-*)"
real_dir="$(readlink -f "${to_unbind}")"
echo "${to_unbind}" > unbind
cd "${real_dir}"
echo 0 > authorized
echo 1 > authorized
Fixes: a87b8e3be9 ("usb: core: Allow subclassed USB drivers to override usb_choose_configuration()")
Reviewed-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211073237.v3.1.If27eb3bf7812f91ab83810f232292f032f4203e0@changeid
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Source-only port partner will always respond NOT_SUPPORTED to
GET_SINK_CAP. Avoid this redundant AMS by bailing out querying the FRS
capability if the Source port partner is not DRP.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Tso <kyletso@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205074747.1821297-1-kyletso@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Follow the bindings and use 16-bit value for AltMode SVID instead of
using the full u32.
Fixes: b3dea91412 ("arm64: dts: qcom: qrb5165-rb5: enable DP altmode")
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204020303.2287338-4-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
As stated in the changelog for the commit 7b458a4c5d ("usb: typec: Add
typec_port_register_altmodes()"), the code should be adjusted according
to the AltMode bindings. As the SVID is 16 bits wide (according to the
USB PD Spec), use fwnode_property_read_u16() to read it.
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204020303.2287338-3-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Add description of the USB-C AltModes supported on the particular USB-C
connector. This is required for devices like Qualcomm Robotics RB5,
which have no other way to express alternative modes supported by the
hardware platform.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204020303.2287338-2-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The 'peer-hub' is a valid property for the hub.
Document it to fix the following dt-schema warning:
imx8mp-debix-som-a-bmb-08.dtb: hub@1: 'peer-hub' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/usb/genesys,gl850g.yaml#
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231207124217.2530457-1-festevam@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
In ACM support for sending breaks to devices is optional.
If a device says that it doenot support sending breaks,
the host must respect that.
Given the number of optional features providing tty operations
for each combination is not practical and errors need to be
returned dynamically if unsupported features are requested.
In case a device does not support break, we want the tty layer
to treat that like it treats drivers that statically cannot
support sending a break. It ignores the inability and does nothing.
This patch uses EOPNOTSUPP to indicate that.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Fixes: 9e98966c7b ("tty: rework break handling")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231207132639.18250-1-oneukum@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Improve error handling for PM APIs in the dwc3_xlnx_probe function by
introducing devm_pm_runtime_enable and error label. Removed unnecessary
API pm_runtime_disable call in dwc3_xlnx_remove.
Signed-off-by: Piyush Mehta <piyush.mehta@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1700590878-124335-1-git-send-email-radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
When a "storm" of corrected machine check interrupts (CMCI) is detected
this code mitigates by disabling CMCI interrupt signalling from all of
the banks owned by the CPU that saw the storm.
There are problems with this approach:
1) It is very coarse grained. In all likelihood only one of the banks
was generating the interrupts, but CMCI is disabled for all. This
means Linux may delay seeing and processing errors logged from other
banks.
2) Although CMCI stands for Corrected Machine Check Interrupt, it is
also used to signal when an uncorrected error is logged. This is
a problem because these errors should be handled in a timely manner.
Delete all this code in preparation for a finer grained solution.
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Tested-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231115195450.12963-2-tony.luck@intel.com
