On TGL+ the DSS control registers are at different offsets, and there's
one per pipe. Fix the offsets to fix dual link DSI for TGL+.
There would be helpers for this in the DSC code, but just do the quick
fix now for DSI. Long term, we should probably move all the DSS handling
into intel_vdsc.c, so exporting the helpers seems counter-productive.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8232
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230301151409.1581574-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-38-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-37-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-36-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-35-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-34-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-33-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-32-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-31-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-30-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-29-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-28-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-27-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-26-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-25-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-24-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-23-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-22-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-21-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-20-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-19-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-18-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-16-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-15-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-14-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-13-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-12-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-11-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-9-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303172041.2103336-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The DisplayPort and MIPI phys are actually part of the Power Management
Unit system controller. They do not have their own address space, thus
keeping the nodes under soc causes warnings:
exynos5250-arndale.dtb: soc: video-phy-0: {'compatible': ['samsung,exynos5250-dp-video-phy'],
'samsung,pmu-syscon': [[20]], '#phy-cells': [[0]], 'phandle': [[24]]} should not be valid under {'type': 'object'}
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127194057.186458-8-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
The DisplayPort and MIPI phys are actually part of the Power Management
Unit system controller. They do not have their own address space, thus
keeping the nodes under soc causes warnings:
exynos5420-smdk5420.dtb: soc: dp-video-phy: {'compatible': ['samsung,exynos5420-dp-video-phy'],
'samsung,pmu-syscon': [[11]], '#phy-cells': [[0]], 'phandle': [[16]]} should not be valid under {'type': 'object'}
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127194057.186458-7-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
The xtables packet traverser performs an unconditional local_bh_disable(),
but the nf_tables evaluation loop does not.
Functions that are called from either xtables or nftables must assume
that they can be called in process context.
inet_twsk_deschedule_put() assumes that no softirq interrupt can occur.
If tproxy is used from nf_tables its possible that we'll deadlock
trying to aquire a lock already held in process context.
Add a small helper that takes care of this and use it.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-devel/401bd6ed-314a-a196-1cdc-e13c720cc8f2@balasys.hu/
Fixes: 4ed8eb6570 ("netfilter: nf_tables: Add native tproxy support")
Reported-and-tested-by: Major Dávid <major.david@balasys.hu>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
It seems that change was unintentional, we have userspace code that
needs the mark while listening for events like REPLY, DESTROY, etc.
Also include 0-marks in requested dumps, as they were before that fix.
Fixes: 1feeae0715 ("netfilter: ctnetlink: fix compilation warning after data race fixes in ct mark")
Signed-off-by: Ivan Delalande <colona@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
There is a few things done:
- include only the headers we are direct user of
- when pointer is in use, provide a forward declaration
- add missing headers
- group generic headers and subsystem headers
- sort each group alphabetically
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
The struct fwnode_handle pointer is used in both branches of ifdeffery,
no need to have a copy of the same in each of them, just make it global.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
There is no struct device_node pointers anywhere in the header,
drop unused forward declaration.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, split out the GPIO group of headers.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, split out the GPIO group of headers.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, drop unused linux/gpio.h and split out the GPIO group of
headers.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
This is a rarely used feature that has nothing to do with the
client-side of_gpio.h.
Split it out with a separate header file and Kconfig option
so it can be removed on its own timeline aside from removing
the of_gpio consumer interfaces.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
