To facilitate subsequent conversion of the driver to a platform one,
make it install an ACPI notify handler directly instead of using
a .notify() callback in struct acpi_driver.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/9591832.CDJkKcVGEf@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the System76 ACPI driver to a platform one.
After this change, the subordinate hwmon, input and LED class devices
will be registered under the platform device used for driver binding
instead of its ACPI companion.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3401648.aeNJFYEL58@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To facilitate subsequent conversion of the driver to a platform one,
make it install an ACPI notify handler directly instead of using
a .notify() callback in struct acpi_driver.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/13970743.uLZWGnKmhe@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Drop two redundant devm_led_classdev_unregister() calls from
system76_remove().
No intentional functional impact.
Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5057164.GXAFRqVoOG@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the Panasonic laptop ACPI driver to a platform
one.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
To maintain backwards compatibility with possibly existing user space,
the sysfs attributes created by the driver under the ACPI device object
used by it are not relocated. Accordingly, the driver will continue to
use the driver_data pointer in struct acpi_device which needs to be
cleared on driver removal.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/8664183.T7Z3S40VBb@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To facilitate subsequent conversion of the driver to a platform one,
make it install an ACPI notify handler directly instead of using
a .notify() callback in struct acpi_driver.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/13979037.uLZWGnKmhe@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
The device pointer cannot be NULL in acpi_pcc_hotkey_add() and
acpi_pcc_hotkey_remove() because these functions are ACPI driver
callbacks and NULL is never passed to any of them as an argument.
Likewise, acpi_pcc_hotkey_resume() is a resume callback of a
device driver and NULL is never passed to it as an argument, so
the dev pointer in it cannot be NULL.
Moreover, since acpi_pcc_hotkey_remove() and acpi_pcc_hotkey_resume()
can only run after acpi_pcc_hotkey_add() has completed successfully,
the acpi_driver_data() of the device object used by them cannot be
NULL when they run.
Drop all of the redundant NULL checks of the pointers mentioned above.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1957824.tdWV9SEqCh@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
An ACPI notify handler is leaked if device_create_file() returns an
error in acpi_pcc_hotkey_add().
Also, it is pointless to call pcc_unregister_optd_notifier() in
acpi_pcc_hotkey_remove() if pcc->platform is NULL and it is better
to arrange the cleanup code in that function in the same order as
the rollback code in acpi_pcc_hotkey_add().
Address the above by placing the pcc_register_optd_notifier() call in
acpi_pcc_hotkey_add() after the device_create_file() return value
check and placing the pcc_unregister_optd_notifier() call in
acpi_pcc_hotkey_remove() right before the device_remove_file() call.
Fixes: d5a81d8e86 ("platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Add support for optical driver power in Y and W series")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2411055.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Convert pcc_register_optd_notifier() whose return value is never used to
a void function.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/5093613.31r3eYUQgx@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the main part of the Fujitsu laptop driver
from an ACPI driver to a platform one.
After this change, the subordinate LED and input devices will be
registered under the platform device used for driver binding instead of
its ACPI companion.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/10818905.nUPlyArG6x@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the backlight part of the Fujitsu laptop
driver from an ACPI driver to a platform one.
After this change, the backlight and input subordinate devices will be
registered under the platform device used for driver binding instead of
its ACPI companion.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3407755.44csPzL39Z@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To facilitate subsequent conversion of the driver to using struct
platform_driver instead of struct acpi_driver, make it install its ACPI
notify handlers directly instead of using struct acpi_driver .notify()
callbacks.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3035290.e9J7NaK4W3@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Move the definitions of acpi_fujitsu_bl_notify() and
acpi_fujitsu_laptop_notify() along with some helpers above
the definitions of the functions that will refer to them
after subsequent changes, to avoid having to add forward
declarations of them.
No intentional functional impact.
Acked-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1950259.tdWV9SEqCh@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the fujitsu-tablet ACPI driver to a platform
one.
After this change, the subordinate input device will be registered under
the platform device used for driver binding instead of its ACPI companion.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Acked-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2403432.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the airplane mode button for AMD, HP and
Xiaomi laptops driver from an ACPI driver to a platform one.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/9607409.CDJkKcVGEf@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To facilitate subsequent conversion of the driver to a platform one,
make it install an ACPI notify handler directly instead of using
a .notify() callback in struct acpi_driver.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3953848.kQq0lBPeGt@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the Topstar Laptop ACPI Extras driver from
an ACPI driver to a platform one.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/10834824.nUPlyArG6x@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To facilitate subsequent conversion of the driver to a platform one,
make it install an ACPI notify handler directly instead of using
a .notify() callback in struct acpi_driver.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3425557.44csPzL39Z@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the Programmable IO Control (pic) part of
the Sony laptop driver from an ACPI driver to a platform one.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2059875.yKVeVyVuyW@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the Notebook Control (nc) part of the Sony
laptop driver from an ACPI driver to a platform one.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/886676729.0ifERbkFSE@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To facilitate subsequent conversion of the driver to a platform one,
make it install an ACPI notify handler directly instead of using
a .notify() callback in struct acpi_driver.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2559802.jE0xQCEvom@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the LG Gram ACPI features and hotkeys driver
from an ACPI driver to a platform one.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1868365.VLH7GnMWUR@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To facilitate subsequent conversion of the driver to using struct
platform_driver instead of struct acpi_driver, drop the debug-only
notify handler method from the driver.
No intentional functional impact beyond debug.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3346280.5fSG56mABF@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Some platforms expose PMT discovery via ACPI instead of PCI BARs. Add a
generic discovery source flag and carry ACPI discovery entries alongside
the existing PCI resource path so PMT clients can consume either.
Changes:
- Add enum intel_vsec_disc_source { _PCI, _ACPI }.
- Extend intel_vsec_platform_info and intel_vsec_device with source enum
and ACPI discovery table pointer/
- When src==ACPI, skip BAR resource setup and copy the ACPI discovery
entries into the aux device.
No user-visible behavior change yet; this only wires ACPI data through vsec
in preparation for ACPI-enumerated PMT clients.
Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260313015202.3660072-7-david.e.box@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Stop collapsing registration results into booleans. Make
intel_vsec_walk_header() return int and propagate the first non-zero error
from intel_vsec_register_device(). intel_vsec_register() now returns that
error directly and 0 on success.
This preserves success behavior while surfacing meaningful errors instead
of hiding them behind a bool/-ENODEV, which makes debugging and probe
ordering issues clearer.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260313015202.3660072-6-david.e.box@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Preparatory refactor for ACPI-enumerated PMT endpoints. Several exported
PMT/VSEC interfaces and structs carried struct pci_dev * even though
callers only need a generic struct device. Move those to struct device * so
the same APIs work for PCI and ACPI parents.
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260313015202.3660072-5-david.e.box@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
This refactor prepares for adding ACPI-enumerated PMT endpoints. While
intel_vsec is bound to PCI today, some helpers are used by code that will
also register PMT endpoints from non-PCI (ACPI) paths. Clean up
PCI-specific plumbing where it isn’t strictly required and rely on generic
struct device where possible.
Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260313015202.3660072-4-david.e.box@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Treat PCI id->driver_data (intel_vsec_platform_info) as read-only by making
vsec_priv->info a const pointer and updating all function signatures to
accept const intel_vsec_platform_info *.
This improves const-correctness and clarifies that the platform info data
from the driver_data table is not meant to be modified at runtime.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260313015202.3660072-3-david.e.box@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
The base_addr field in intel_vsec_platform_info was originally added to
support devices that emulate PCI VSEC capabilities in MMIO. Previously,
the code would check at registration time whether base_addr was set,
falling back to the PCI BAR if not.
Refactor this by making base_addr an explicit function parameter. This
clarifies ownership of the value and removes conditional logic from
intel_vsec_add_dev(). It also enables making intel_vsec_platform_info
const in a later patch, since the function no longer needs to write to
info->base_addr.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260313015202.3660072-2-david.e.box@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Add a sysfs attribute to enable or disable TrackPoint double-tap hotkey
events at the kernel level.
The TrackPoint firmware enables double-tap support automatically. This
interface allows userspace to control whether double-tap events are
forwarded to userspace.
The attribute is available at:
/sys/devices/platform/thinkpad_acpi/doubletap_enable
0 - Disable double-tap hotkey events
1 - Enable double-tap hotkey events (default)
Filtering is implemented by suppressing ACPI hotkey delivery without
injecting synthetic input events.
Signed-off-by: Vishnu Sankar <vishnuocv@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260311143144.482145-3-vishnuocv@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Enable doubletap functionality by default on TrackPoint devices that
support it. The feature is detected using firmware ID pattern matching
(PNP: LEN03xxx) with a deny list of incompatible devices.
This provides immediate doubletap functionality without requiring
userspace configuration. The hardware is enabled during device
detection, while event filtering continues to be handled by the
thinkpad_acpi driver as before.
Signed-off-by: Vishnu Sankar <vishnuocv@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260311143144.482145-2-vishnuocv@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Replace sprintf() with sysfs_emit() and sysfs_emit_at() in sysfs show
functions. sysfs_emit() and sysfs_emit_at() are preferred for formatting
sysfs output because they provide safer bounds checking.
In reset_bios_show(), use sysfs_emit_at() to avoid manual buffer size
accounting.
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260305140912.258090-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the Surface Pro 3 button ACPI driver to a
platform one.
After this change, the subordinate input device and wakeup source class
device will be registered under the platform device used for driver
binding instead of its ACPI companion.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3207406.CbtlEUcBR6@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To facilitate subsequent conversion of the driver to a platform one,
make it install an ACPI notify handler directly instead of using
a .notify() callback in struct acpi_driver.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1881356.TLkxdtWsSY@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
The wakeup source added by device_init_wakeup() in surface_button_add()
needs to be dropped during driver removal, so update the driver to do
that.
Fixes: 19351f3407 ("platform/x86: surfacepro3: Support for wakeup from suspend-to-idle")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/4368848.1IzOArtZ34@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the Intel Smart Connect disabling ACPI
driver to a platform one.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/24282289.6Emhk5qWAg@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the Intel Rapid Start Technology (rst) ACPI
driver to a platform one.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3599223.QJadu78ljV@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the EEEPC laptop ACPI driver to a platform
one.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Denis Benato <denis.benato@linux.dev>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3329436.5fSG56mABF@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To facilitate subsequent conversion of the driver to a platform one,
make it install an ACPI notify handler directly instead of using
a .notify() callback in struct acpi_driver.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Denis Benato <denis.benato@linux.dev>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/3681264.iIbC2pHGDl@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
In all cases in which a struct acpi_driver is used for binding a driver
to an ACPI device object, a corresponding platform device is created by
the ACPI core and that device is regarded as a proper representation of
underlying hardware. Accordingly, a struct platform_driver should be
used by driver code to bind to that device. There are multiple reasons
why drivers should not bind directly to ACPI device objects [1].
Overall, it is better to bind drivers to platform devices than to their
ACPI companions, so convert the Acer wireless ACPI driver to a platform
one.
After this change, the subordinate input device will be registered
under the platform device used for driver binding instead of its ACPI
companion.
While this is not expected to alter functionality, it changes sysfs
layout and so it will be visible to user space.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2396510.ElGaqSPkdT@rafael.j.wysocki/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/2032103.PYKUYFuaPT@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To facilitate subsequent conversion of the driver to a platform one,
make it install an ACPI notify handler directly instead of using
a .notify() callback in struct acpi_driver.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/10810967.nUPlyArG6x@rafael.j.wysocki
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
checkpatch.pl reported warnings where seq_printf() was used for simple
strings with no format specifiers.
Replace these instances with seq_puts() to avoid the overhead of runtime
string parsing and to conform to kernel coding standards.
Signed-off-by: Coby McKinney <coby@bytemap.space>
Reviewed-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260202205214.18898-1-coby@bytemap.space
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
wmi_sysman_kobj_sysfs_ops are identical to the standard kobj_sysfs_ops.
Drop the unnecessary custom copy.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260223-sysfs-const-dell-wmi-sysman-v1-1-8a690884044e@weissschuh.net
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
GPIO subsystem is switching the way it locates GPIO chip instances for
GPIO references in software nodes from matching on node names to
identity matching, which necessitates assigning firmware nodes
(software nodes) to GPIO chips.
Attach apu2_gpiochip_node to the platform device representing the GPIO
controller.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/aY-oAVI0TubcaD2K@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Two x86 platform drivers have unnecessary module_init() and module_exit()
functions that are empty or just print a message. Remove them.
Signed-off-by: Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260131020118.46171-1-enelsonmoore@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
- Fix a build error on parisc
- Remove the non-large-folio-aware function fsverity_verify_page()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iIoEABYIADIWIQSacvsUNc7UX4ntmEPzXCl4vpKOKwUCaZtg+xQcZWJpZ2dlcnNA
a2VybmVsLm9yZwAKCRDzXCl4vpKOKwQ+AQCiXEYAibl3vHRgQo7qEPCC5or4FtkF
HZ0ERRArhsU17AD/TKHE/AJkyFrwK4rGTb6I9Wi1OXnpG7jihZlYjj03Ag4=
=CUql
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'fsverity-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fsverity/linux
Pull fsverity fixes from Eric Biggers:
- Fix a build error on parisc
- Remove the non-large-folio-aware function fsverity_verify_page()
* tag 'fsverity-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fsverity/linux:
fsverity: fix build error by adding fsverity_readahead() stub
fsverity: remove fsverity_verify_page()
f2fs: make f2fs_verify_cluster() partially large-folio-aware
f2fs: remove unnecessary ClearPageUptodate in f2fs_verify_cluster()
Fix a big endian specific issue in the PPC64-optimized AES code.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iIoEABYIADIWIQSacvsUNc7UX4ntmEPzXCl4vpKOKwUCaZtiphQcZWJpZ2dlcnNA
a2VybmVsLm9yZwAKCRDzXCl4vpKOK/z2AQD1j15Ao3iDW3yBSyTS+tFJaRUVDtjg
bNostoNJAjMM9wD/X0oAnt95WTNkdHexs+2aMzQ4ULKFRcwQrUTarKx7IgY=
=Dmfx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'libcrypto-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux
Pull crypto library fix from Eric Biggers:
"Fix a big endian specific issue in the PPC64-optimized AES code"
* tag 'libcrypto-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux:
lib/crypto: powerpc/aes: Fix rndkey_from_vsx() on big endian CPUs
Stephen retired and stepped back from -next maintainership, update his
entry in CREDITS to recognise his 18 years of hard work making it what
it is today and all the impact it's had on our development process.
Also update to his current GnuPG key while we're here.
Acked-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
