Commit graph

1,413,440 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
KP Singh
ea1535e28b bpf: Limit bpf program signature size
Practical BPF signatures are significantly smaller than
KMALLOC_MAX_CACHE_SIZE

Allowing larger sizes opens the door for abuse by passing excessive
size values and forcing the kernel into expensive allocation paths (via
kmalloc_large or vmalloc).

Fixes: 3492715683 ("bpf: Implement signature verification for BPF programs")
Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260205063807.690823-1-kpsingh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-05 08:31:42 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
75cd3beb64 Merge branch 'fix-for-bpf_wq-retry-loop-during-free'
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi says:

====================
Fix for bpf_wq retry loop during free

Small fix and improvement to ensure cancel_work() can handle the case
where wq callback is running, and doesn't lead to call_rcu_tasks_trace()
repeatedly after failing cancel_work, if wq callback is not pending.
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260205003853.527571-1-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-04 18:14:26 -08:00
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
5000a097f8 bpf: Reset prog callback in bpf_async_cancel_and_free()
Replace prog and callback in bpf_async_cb after removing visibility of
bpf_async_cb in bpf_async_cancel_and_free() to increase the chances the
scheduled async callbacks short-circuit execution and exit early, and
not starting a RCU tasks trace section. This improves the overall time
spent in running the wq selftest.

Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260205003853.527571-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-04 18:14:26 -08:00
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
81502d7f20 bpf: Check for running wq callback when freeing bpf_async_cb
When freeing a bpf_async_cb in bpf_async_cb_rcu_tasks_trace_free(), in
case the wq callback is not scheduled, doing cancel_work() currently
returns false and leads to retry of RCU tasks trace grace period. If the
callback is never scheduled, we keep retrying indefinitely and don't put
the prog reference.

Since the only race we care about here is against a potentially running
wq callback in the first grace period, it should finish by the second
grace period, hence check work_busy() result to detect presence of
running wq callback if it's not pending, otherwise free the object
immediately without retrying.

Reasoning behind the check and its correctness with racing wq callback
invocation: cancel_work is supposed to be synchronized, hence calling it
first and getting false would mean that work is definitely not pending,
at this point, either the work is not scheduled at all or already
running, or we race and it already finished by the time we checked for
it using work_busy(). In case it is running, we synchronize using
pool->lock to check the current work running there, if we match, it
means we extend the wait by another grace period using retry = true,
otherwise either the work already finished running or was never
scheduled, so we can free the bpf_async_cb right away.

Fixes: 1bfbc267ec ("bpf: Enable bpf_timer and bpf_wq in any context")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260205003853.527571-2-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-04 18:14:26 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
6e951a9b1a Merge branch 'bpf-improve-linked-register-tracking'
Puranjay Mohan says:

====================
bpf: Improve linked register tracking

V3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260203222643.994713-1-puranjay@kernel.org/
Changes in v3->v4:
- Add a call to reg_bounds_sync() in sync_linked_regs() to sync bounds after alu op.
- Add a __sink(path[0]); in the C selftest so compiler doesn't say  "error: variable 'path' set but
  not used"

V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260113152529.3217648-1-puranjay@kernel.org/
Changes in v2->v3:
- Added another selftest showing a real usage pattern
- Rebased on bpf-next/master

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260107203941.1063754-1-puranjay@kernel.org/
Changes in v1->v2:
- Add support for alu32 operations in linked register tracking (Alexei)
- Squash the selftest fix with the first patch (Eduard)
- Add more selftests to detect edge cases

This series extends the BPF verifier's linked register tracking to handle
negative offsets, BPF_SUB operations, and alu32 operations, enabling better bounds propagation for
common arithmetic patterns.

The verifier previously only tracked positive constant deltas between linked
registers using BPF_ADD. This meant patterns using negative offsets or
subtraction couldn't benefit from bounds propagation:

  void alu32_negative_offset(void)
  {
          volatile char path[5];
          volatile int offset = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
          int off = offset;

          if (off >= 5 && off < 10)
                  path[off - 5] = '.';
  }

this gets compiled to:

0000000000000478 <alu32_negative_offset>:
     143:       call 0x7
     144:       *(u32 *)(r10 - 0xc) = w0
     145:       w1 = *(u32 *)(r10 - 0xc)
     146:       w2 = w1				// w2 and w1 share the same id
     147:       w2 += -0x5			// verifier knows w1 = w2 + 5
     148:       if w2 > 0x4 goto +0x5 <L0>	// in fall-through: verifier knows w2 ∈ [0,4] => w1 ∈ [5, 9]
     149:       r2 = r10
     150:       r2 += -0x5			// r2 = fp - 5
     151:       r2 += r1			// r2 = fp - 5 + r1 (∈ [5, 9]) => r2 ∈ [fp, fp + 4]
     152:       w1 = 0x2e
     153:       *(u8 *)(r2 - 0x5) = w1		// r2 ∈ [fp, fp + 4] => r2 - 5 ∈ [fp - 5, fp - 1]
<L0>:
     154:       exit

After the changes, the verifier could link 32-bit scalars and also supported -ve offsets for linking:

	146:       w2 = w1
	147:       w2 += -0x5

It allowed the verifier to correctly propagate bounds, without the
changes in this patchset, verifier would reject this program with:

invalid unbounded variable-offset write to stack R2

This program has been added as a selftest in the second patch.

Veristat comparison on programs from sched_ext, selftests, and some meta internal programs:

Scx Progs
File               Program           Verdict (A)  Verdict (B)  Verdict (DIFF)  Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns  (DIFF)
-----------------  ----------------  -----------  -----------  --------------  ---------  ---------  -------------
scx_layered.bpf.o  layered_runnable  success      success      MATCH                5674       6077  +403 (+7.10%)

FB Progs
File          Program           Verdict (A)  Verdict (B)  Verdict (DIFF)  Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns      (DIFF)
------------  ----------------  -----------  -----------  --------------  ---------  ---------  -----------------
bpf232.bpf.o  layered_dump      success      success      MATCH                1151       1218       +67 (+5.82%)
bpf257.bpf.o  layered_runnable  success      success      MATCH                5743       6143      +400 (+6.97%)
bpf252.bpf.o  layered_runnable  success      success      MATCH                5677       6075      +398 (+7.01%)
bpf227.bpf.o  layered_dump      success      success      MATCH                 915        982       +67 (+7.32%)
bpf239.bpf.o  layered_runnable  success      success      MATCH                5459       5861      +402 (+7.36%)
bpf246.bpf.o  layered_runnable  success      success      MATCH                5562       6008      +446 (+8.02%)
bpf229.bpf.o  layered_runnable  success      success      MATCH                2559       3011     +452 (+17.66%)
bpf231.bpf.o  layered_runnable  success      success      MATCH                2559       3011     +452 (+17.66%)
bpf234.bpf.o  layered_runnable  success      success      MATCH                2549       3001     +452 (+17.73%)
bpf019.bpf.o  do_sendmsg        success      success      MATCH              124823     153523   +28700 (+22.99%)
bpf019.bpf.o  do_parse          success      success      MATCH              124809     153509   +28700 (+23.00%)
bpf227.bpf.o  layered_runnable  success      success      MATCH                1915       2356     +441 (+23.03%)
bpf228.bpf.o  layered_runnable  success      success      MATCH                1700       2152     +452 (+26.59%)
bpf232.bpf.o  layered_runnable  success      success      MATCH                1499       1951     +452 (+30.15%)

bpf312.bpf.o  mount_exit        success      success      MATCH               19253      62883  +43630 (+226.61%)
bpf312.bpf.o  umount_exit       success      success      MATCH               19253      62883  +43630 (+226.61%)
bpf311.bpf.o  mount_exit        success      success      MATCH               19226      62863  +43637 (+226.97%)
bpf311.bpf.o  umount_exit       success      success      MATCH               19226      62863  +43637 (+226.97%)

The above four programs have specific patters that make the verifier explore a lot more states:

    for (; depth < MAX_DIR_DEPTH; depth++) {
        const unsigned char* name = BPF_CORE_READ(dentry, d_name.name);
        if (offset >= MAX_PATH_LEN - MAX_DIR_LEN) {
            return depth;
        }
        int len = bpf_probe_read_kernel_str(&path[offset], MAX_DIR_LEN, name);
        offset += len;
        if (len == MAX_DIR_LEN) {
            if (offset - 2 < MAX_PATH_LEN) {   // <---- (a)
                path[offset - 2] = '.';
            }
            if (offset - 3 < MAX_PATH_LEN) {   // <---- (b)
                path[offset - 3] = '.';
            }
            if (offset - 4 < MAX_PATH_LEN) {   // <---- (c)
                path[offset - 4] = '.';
            }
        }
    }

When at some depth == N false branches of conditions (a), (b) and (c) are scheduled for
verification, constraints for offset at depth == N+1 are:
1. offset >= MAX_PATH_LEN + 2
2. offset >= MAX_PATH_LEN + 3
3. offset >= MAX_PATH_LEN + 4 (visited before others)

And after offset += len it becomes:
1. offset >= MAX_PATH_LEN - 4093
2. offset >= MAX_PATH_LEN - 4092
3. offset >= MAX_PATH_LEN - 4091 (visited before others)

Because of the DFS states exploration logic, the states above are visited in order 3, 2, 1; 3 is not
a subset of 2 and 1 is not a subset of 2, so pruning logic does not kick in.
Previously this was not a problem, because range for offset was not propagated through the
statements (a), (b), (c).

As the root cause of this regression is understood, this is not a blocker for this change.

Selftest Progs
File                                Program                   Verdict (A)  Verdict (B)  Verdict (DIFF)  Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns   (DIFF)
----------------------------------  ------------------------  -----------  -----------  --------------  ---------  ---------  --------------
linked_list_peek.bpf.o              list_peek                 success      success      MATCH                 152         88   -64 (-42.11%)
verifier_iterating_callbacks.bpf.o  cond_break2               success      success      MATCH                 110         88   -22 (-20.00%)

These are the added selftests that failed earlier but are passing now:

verifier_linked_scalars.bpf.o       alu32_negative_offset     failure      success      MISMATCH               11         13    +2 (+18.18%)
verifier_linked_scalars.bpf.o       scalars_alu32_big_offset  failure      success      MISMATCH                7         10    +3 (+42.86%)
verifier_linked_scalars.bpf.o       scalars_neg_alu32_add     failure      success      MISMATCH                7         10    +3 (+42.86%)
verifier_linked_scalars.bpf.o       scalars_neg_alu32_sub     failure      success      MISMATCH                7         10    +3 (+42.86%)
verifier_linked_scalars.bpf.o       scalars_neg               failure      success      MISMATCH                7         10    +3 (+42.86%)
verifier_linked_scalars.bpf.o       scalars_neg_sub           failure      success      MISMATCH                7         10    +3 (+42.86%)
verifier_linked_scalars.bpf.o       scalars_sub_neg_imm       failure      success      MISMATCH                7         10    +3 (+42.86%)

iters.bpf.o                         iter_obfuscate_counter    success      success      MATCH                  83        119   +36 (+43.37%)
bpf_cubic.bpf.o                     bpf_cubic_acked           success      success      MATCH                 243        430  +187 (+76.95%)
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260204151741.2678118-1-puranjay@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-04 13:35:29 -08:00
Puranjay Mohan
47fcf4dc0a selftests/bpf: Add tests for improved linked register tracking
Add tests for linked register tracking with negative offsets, BPF_SUB,
and alu32. These test for all edge cases like overflows, etc.

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260204151741.2678118-3-puranjay@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-04 13:35:29 -08:00
Puranjay Mohan
7a433e5193 bpf: Support negative offsets, BPF_SUB, and alu32 for linked register tracking
Previously, the verifier only tracked positive constant deltas between
linked registers using BPF_ADD. This limitation meant patterns like:

  r1 = r0;
  r1 += -4;
  if r1 s>= 0 goto l0_%=;   // r1 >= 0 implies r0 >= 4
  // verifier couldn't propagate bounds back to r0
  if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=;
	r0 /= 0; // Verifier thinks this is reachable
  l0_%=:

Similar limitation exists for 32-bit registers.

With this change, the verifier can now track negative deltas in reg->off
enabling bound propagation for the above pattern.

For alu32, we make sure the destination register has the upper 32 bits
as 0s before creating the link. BPF_ADD_CONST is split into
BPF_ADD_CONST64 and BPF_ADD_CONST32, the latter is used in case of alu32
and sync_linked_regs uses this to zext the result if known_reg has this
flag.

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260204151741.2678118-2-puranjay@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-04 13:35:28 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
b2821311ab Merge branch 'bpf-add-bitwise-tracking-for-bpf_end'
Tianci Cao says:

====================
bpf: Add bitwise tracking for BPF_END

Add bitwise tracking (tnum analysis) for BPF_END (`bswap(16|32|64)`,
`be(16|32|64)`, `le(16|32|64)`) operations. Please see commit log of
1/2 for more details.

v3:
- Resend to fix a version control error in v2.
- The rest of the changes are identical to v2.

v2 (incorrect): https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260204091146.52447-1-ziye@zju.edu.cn/
- Refactored selftests using BSWAP_RANGE_TEST macro to eliminate code
  duplication and improve maintainability. (Eduard)
- Simplified test names. (Eduard)
- Reduced excessive comments in test cases. (Eduard)
- Added more comments to explain BPF_END's special handling of zext_32_to_64.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260202133536.66207-1-ziye@zju.edu.cn/
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260204111503.77871-1-ziye@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-04 13:23:35 -08:00
Tianci Cao
56415363e0 selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF_END bitwise tracking
Now BPF_END has bitwise tracking support. This patch adds selftests to
cover various cases of BPF_END (`bswap(16|32|64)`, `be(16|32|64)`,
`le(16|32|64)`) with bitwise propagation.

This patch is based on existing `verifier_bswap.c`, and add several
types of new tests:

1. Unconditional byte swap operations:
   - bswap16/bswap32/bswap64 with unknown bytes

2. Endian conversion operations (architecture-aware):
   - be16/be32/be64: convert to big-endian
     * on little-endian: do swap
     * on big-endian: truncation (16/32-bit) or no-op (64-bit)
   - le16/le32/le64: convert to little-endian
     * on big-endian: do swap
     * on little-endian: truncation (16/32-bit) or no-op (64-bit)

Each test simulates realistic networking scenarios where a value is
masked with unknown bits (e.g., var_off=(0x0; 0x3f00), range=[0,0x3f00]),
then byte-swapped, and the verifier must prove the result stays within
expected bounds.

Specifically, these selftests are based on dead code elimination:
If the BPF verifier can precisely track bitwise through byte swap
operations, it can prune the trap path (invalid memory access) that
should be unreachable, allowing the program to pass verification.
If bitwise tracking is incorrect, the verifier cannot prove the trap
is unreachable, causing verification failure.

The tests use preprocessor conditionals (#ifdef __BYTE_ORDER__) to
verify correct behavior on both little-endian and big-endian
architectures, and require Clang 18+ for bswap instruction support.

Co-developed-by: Shenghao Yuan <shenghaoyuan0928@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenghao Yuan <shenghaoyuan0928@163.com>
Co-developed-by: Yazhou Tang <tangyazhou518@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Yazhou Tang <tangyazhou518@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Tianci Cao <ziye@zju.edu.cn>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260204111503.77871-3-ziye@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-04 13:23:28 -08:00
Tianci Cao
9d21199842 bpf: Add bitwise tracking for BPF_END
This patch implements bitwise tracking (tnum analysis) for BPF_END
(byte swap) operation.

Currently, the BPF verifier does not track value for BPF_END operation,
treating the result as completely unknown. This limits the verifier's
ability to prove safety of programs that perform endianness conversions,
which are common in networking code.

For example, the following code pattern for port number validation:

int test(struct pt_regs *ctx) {
    __u64 x = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
    x &= 0x3f00;           // Range: [0, 0x3f00], var_off: (0x0; 0x3f00)
    x = bswap16(x);        // Should swap to range [0, 0x3f], var_off: (0x0; 0x3f)
    if (x > 0x3f) goto trap;
    return 0;
trap:
    return *(u64 *)NULL;   // Should be unreachable
}

Currently generates verifier output:

1: (54) w0 &= 16128                   ; R0=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=16128,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f00))
2: (d7) r0 = bswap16 r0               ; R0=scalar()
3: (25) if r0 > 0x3f goto pc+2        ; R0=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=63,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f))

Without this patch, even though the verifier knows `x` has certain bits
set, after bswap16, it loses all tracking information and treats port
as having a completely unknown value [0, 65535].

According to the BPF instruction set[1], there are 3 kinds of BPF_END:

1. `bswap(16|32|64)`: opcode=0xd7 (BPF_END | BPF_ALU64 | BPF_TO_LE)
   - do unconditional swap
2. `le(16|32|64)`: opcode=0xd4 (BPF_END | BPF_ALU | BPF_TO_LE)
   - on big-endian: do swap
   - on little-endian: truncation (16/32-bit) or no-op (64-bit)
3. `be(16|32|64)`: opcode=0xdc (BPF_END | BPF_ALU | BPF_TO_BE)
   - on little-endian: do swap
   - on big-endian: truncation (16/32-bit) or no-op (64-bit)

Since BPF_END operations are inherently bit-wise permutations, tnum
(bitwise tracking) offers the most efficient and precise mechanism
for value analysis. By implementing `tnum_bswap16`, `tnum_bswap32`,
and `tnum_bswap64`, we can derive exact `var_off` values concisely,
directly reflecting the bit-level changes.

Here is the overview of changes:

1. In `tnum_bswap(16|32|64)` (kernel/bpf/tnum.c):

Call `swab(16|32|64)` function on the value and mask of `var_off`, and
do truncation for 16/32-bit cases.

2. In `adjust_scalar_min_max_vals` (kernel/bpf/verifier.c):

Call helper function `scalar_byte_swap`.
- Only do byte swap when
  * alu64 (unconditional swap) OR
  * switching between big-endian and little-endian machines.
- If need do byte swap:
  * Firstly call `tnum_bswap(16|32|64)` to update `var_off`.
  * Then reset the bound since byte swap scrambles the range.
- For 16/32-bit cases, truncate dst register to match the swapped size.

This enables better verification of networking code that frequently uses
byte swaps for protocol processing, reducing false positive rejections.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/bpf/standardization/instruction-set.rst

Co-developed-by: Shenghao Yuan <shenghaoyuan0928@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Shenghao Yuan <shenghaoyuan0928@163.com>
Co-developed-by: Yazhou Tang <tangyazhou518@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Yazhou Tang <tangyazhou518@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Tianci Cao <ziye@zju.edu.cn>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260204111503.77871-2-ziye@zju.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-04 13:22:39 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
4af526698b Merge branch 'bpf-fix-conditions-when-timer-wq-can-be-called'
Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
bpf: Fix conditions when timer/wq can be called

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

v2->v3:
- Add missing refcount_put
- Detect recursion of indiviual async_cb
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260204040834.22263-4-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com/

v1->v2:
- Add a recursion check
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260204030927.171-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com/
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260204055147.54960-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2026-02-04 13:12:51 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
6e65cf81ac selftests/bpf: Strengthen timer_start_deadlock test
Strengthen timer_start_deadlock test and check for recursion now

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260204055147.54960-5-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-04 13:12:50 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
64873307e8 bpf: Add a recursion check to prevent loops in bpf_timer
Do not schedule timer/wq operation on a cpu that is in irq_work
callback that is processing async_cmds queue.
Otherwise the following loop is possible:
bpf_timer_start() -> bpf_async_schedule_op() -> irq_work_queue().
irqrestore -> bpf_async_irq_worker() -> tracepoint -> bpf_timer_start().

Fixes: 1bfbc267ec ("bpf: Enable bpf_timer and bpf_wq in any context")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260204055147.54960-4-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-04 13:12:50 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
67ee5ad27d selftests/bpf: Add a testcase for deadlock avoidance
Add a testcase that checks that deadlock avoidance is working
as expected.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260204055147.54960-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-04 13:12:50 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
7d49635e37 bpf: Tighten conditions when timer/wq can be called synchronously
Though hrtimer_start/cancel() inlines all of the smaller helpers in
hrtimer.c and only call timerqueue_add/del() from lib/timerqueue.c where
everything is not traceable and not kprobe-able (because all files in
lib/ are not traceable), there are tracepoints within hrtimer that are
called with locks held. Therefore prevent the deadlock by tightening
conditions when timer/wq can be called synchronously.
hrtimer/wq are using raw_spin_lock_irqsave(), so irqs_disabled() is enough.

Fixes: 1bfbc267ec ("bpf: Enable bpf_timer and bpf_wq in any context")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260204055147.54960-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-04 13:12:50 -08:00
Donglin Peng
5e6e1dc43a resolve_btfids: Refactor the sort_btf_by_name function
Preserve original relative order of anonymous or same-named
types to improve the consistency.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260202120114.3707141-1-dolinux.peng@gmail.com
2026-02-04 10:17:19 -08:00
Martin KaFai Lau
78a16058e4 Merge branch 'bpf-misc-changes-around-af_unix'
Kuniyuki Iwashima says:

====================
bpf: Misc changes around AF_UNIX.

Patch 1 adapts sk_is_XXX() helpers in __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_addr().
Patch 2 removes an unnecessary sk_fullsock() in bpf_skc_to_unix_sock().
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260203213442.682838-1-kuniyu@google.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2026-02-04 09:36:10 -08:00
Kuniyuki Iwashima
c26b098bf4 bpf: Don't check sk_fullsock() in bpf_skc_to_unix_sock().
AF_UNIX does not use TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV nor TCP_TIME_WAIT and
checking sk->sk_family is sufficient.

Let's remove sk_fullsock() and use sk_is_unix() in
bpf_skc_to_unix_sock().

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260203213442.682838-3-kuniyu@google.com
2026-02-04 09:36:06 -08:00
Kuniyuki Iwashima
f06581392e bpf: Use sk_is_inet() and sk_is_unix() in __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_addr().
sk->sk_family should be read with READ_ONCE() in
__cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_addr() due to IPV6_ADDRFORM.

Also, the comment there is a bit stale since commit 859051dd16
("bpf: Implement cgroup sockaddr hooks for unix sockets"), and the
kdoc has the same comment.

Let's use sk_is_inet() and sk_is_unix() and remove the comment.

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260203213442.682838-2-kuniyu@google.com
2026-02-04 09:36:01 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
b28dac3fc9 Merge branch 'bpf-avoid-locks-in-bpf_timer-and-bpf_wq'
Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
bpf: Avoid locks in bpf_timer and bpf_wq

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

This series reworks implementation of BPF timer and workqueue APIs to
make them usable from any context.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>

Changes in v9:
- Different approach for patches 1 and 3:
- s/EBUSY/ENOENT/ when refcnt==0 to match existing
- drop latch, use refcnt and kmalloc_nolock() instead
- address race between timer/wq_start and delete_elem, add a test
- Link to v8: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260127-timer_nolock-v8-0-5a29a9571059@meta.com/

Changes in v8:
- Return -EBUSY in bpf_async_read_op() if last_seq is failed to be set
- In bpf_async_cancel_and_free() drop bpf_async_cb ref after calling bpf_async_process()
- Link to v7: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260122-timer_nolock-v7-0-04a45c55c2e2@meta.com

Changes in v7:
- Addressed Andrii's review points from the previous version - nothing
  very significang.
- Added NMI stress tests for bpf_timer - hit few verifier failing checks
  and removed them.
- Address sparse warning in the bpf_async_update_prog_callback()
- Link to v6: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260120-timer_nolock-v6-0-670ffdd787b4@meta.com

Changes in v6:
- Reworked destruction and refcnt use:
  - On cancel_and_free() set last_seq to BPF_ASYNC_DESTROY value, drop
    map's reference
  - In irq work callback, atomically switch DESTROY to DESTROYED, cancel
    timer/wq
  - Free bpf_async_cb on refcnt going to 0.
- Link to v5: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260115-timer_nolock-v5-0-15e3aef2703d@meta.com

Changes in v5:
- Extracted lock-free algorithm for updating cb->prog and
cb->callback_fn into a function bpf_async_update_prog_callback(),
added a new commit and introduces this function and uses it in
__bpf_async_set_callback(), bpf_timer_cancel() and
bpf_async_cancel_and_free().
This allows to move the change into the separate commit without breaking
correctness.
- Handle NULL prog in bpf_async_update_prog_callback().
- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260114-timer_nolock-v4-0-fa6355f51fa7@meta.com

Changes in v4:
- Handle irq_work_queue failures in both schedule and cancel_and_free
paths: introduced bpf_async_refcnt_dec_cleanup() that decrements refcnt
and makes sure if last reference is put, there is at least one irq_work
scheduled to execute final cleanup.
- Additional refcnt inc/dec in set_callback() + rcu lock to make sure
cleanup is not running at the same time as set_callback().
- Added READ_ONCE where it was needed.
- Squash 'bpf: Refactor __bpf_async_set_callback()' commit into 'bpf:
Add lock-free cell for NMI-safe
async operations'
- Removed mpmc_cell, use seqcount_latch_t instead.
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260107-timer_nolock-v3-0-740d3ec3e5f9@meta.com

Changes in v3:
- Major rework
- Introduce mpmc_cell, allowing concurrent writes and reads
- Implement irq_work deferring
- Adding selftests
- Introduces bpf_timer_cancel_async kfunc
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251105-timer_nolock-v2-0-32698db08bfa@meta.com

Changes in v2:
- Move refcnt initialization and put (from cancel_and_free())
from patch 5 into the patch 4, so that patch 4 has more clear and full
implementation and use of refcnt
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251031-timer_nolock-v1-0-b064ae403bfb@meta.com
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260201025403.66625-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2026-02-03 16:58:48 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
b135beb077 selftests/bpf: Add a test to stress bpf_timer_start and map_delete race
Add a test to stress bpf_timer_start and map_delete race

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260201025403.66625-10-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-03 16:58:47 -08:00
Mykyta Yatsenko
3f7a841520 selftests/bpf: Removed obsolete tests
Now bpf_timer can be used in tracepoints, so these tests are no longer
relevant.

Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260201025403.66625-9-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-03 16:58:47 -08:00
Mykyta Yatsenko
083c5a4bab selftests/bpf: Add timer stress test in NMI context
Add stress tests for BPF timers that run in NMI context using perf_event
programs attached to PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES.

The tests cover three scenarios:
- nmi_race: Tests concurrent timer start and async cancel operations
- nmi_update: Tests updating a map element (effectively deleting and
  inserting new for array map) from within a timer callback
- nmi_cancel: Tests timer self-cancellation attempt.

A common test_common() helper is used to share timer setup logic across
all test modes.

The tests spawn multiple threads in a child process to generate
perf events, which trigger the BPF programs in NMI context. Hit counters
verify that the NMI code paths were actually exercised.

Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260201025403.66625-8-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-03 16:58:47 -08:00
Mykyta Yatsenko
fe9d205cec selftests/bpf: Verify bpf_timer_cancel_async works
Add test that verifies that bpf_timer_cancel_async works: can cancel
callback successfully.

Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260201025403.66625-7-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-03 16:58:47 -08:00
Mykyta Yatsenko
d02fdd7195 selftests/bpf: Add stress test for timer async cancel
Extend BPF timer selftest to run stress test for async cancel.

Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260201025403.66625-6-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-03 16:58:47 -08:00
Mykyta Yatsenko
10653c0dd8 selftests/bpf: Refactor timer selftests
Refactor timer selftests, extracting stress test into a separate test.
This makes it easier to debug test failures and allows to extend.

Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260201025403.66625-5-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-03 16:58:47 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
a7e172aa4c bpf: Introduce bpf_timer_cancel_async() kfunc
Introduce bpf_timer_cancel_async() that wraps hrtimer_try_to_cancel()
and executes it either synchronously or defers to irq_work.

Co-developed-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260201025403.66625-4-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-03 16:58:46 -08:00
Mykyta Yatsenko
19bd300e22 bpf: Add verifier support for bpf_timer argument in kfuncs
Extend the verifier to recognize struct bpf_timer as a valid kfunc
argument type. Previously, bpf_timer was only supported in BPF helpers.

This prepares for adding timer-related kfuncs in subsequent patches.

Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260201025403.66625-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-03 16:58:46 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
1bfbc267ec bpf: Enable bpf_timer and bpf_wq in any context
Refactor bpf_timer and bpf_wq to allow calling them from any context:
- add refcnt to bpf_async_cb
- map_delete_elem or map_free will drop refcnt to zero
  via bpf_async_cancel_and_free()
- once refcnt is zero timer/wq_start is not allowed to make sure
  that callback cannot rearm itself
- if in_hardirq defer to start/cancel operations to irq_work

Co-developed-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260201025403.66625-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2026-02-03 16:58:46 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
f11f7cf90e Merge branch 'bpf-add-bpf_stream_print_stack-kfunc'
Emil Tsalapatis says:

====================
bpf: Add bpf_stream_print_stack kfunc

Add a new bpf_stream_print_stack kfunc for printing a BPF program stack
into a BPF stream. Update the verifier to allow the new kfunc to be
called with BPF spinlocks held, along with bpf_stream_vprintk.

Patchset spun out of the larger libarena + ASAN patchset.
(https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260127181610.86376-1-emil@etsalapatis.com/)

Changeset:
	- Update bpf_stream_print_stack to take stream_id arg (Kumar)
	- Added selftest for the bpf_stream_print_stack
	- Add selftest for calling the streams kfuncs under lock

v2->v1: (https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260202193311.446717-1-emil@etsalapatis.com/)
	- Updated Signed-off-by to be consistent with past submissions
	- Updated From email to be consistent with Signed-off-by

Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260203180424.14057-1-emil@etsalapatis.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-03 10:41:31 -08:00
Emil Tsalapatis
4d99137eea selftests/bpf: Add selftests for stream functions under lock
Add a selftest to ensure BPF stream functions can now be called
while holding a lock.

Signed-off-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260203180424.14057-5-emil@etsalapatis.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-03 10:41:16 -08:00
Emil Tsalapatis
9ddfa24e16 bpf: Allow BPF stream kfuncs while holding a lock
The BPF stream kfuncs bpf_stream_vprintk and bpf_stream_print_stack
do not sleep and so are safe to call while holding a lock. Amend
the verifier to allow that.

Signed-off-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260203180424.14057-4-emil@etsalapatis.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-03 10:41:16 -08:00
Emil Tsalapatis
954fa97e21 selftests/bpf: Add selftests for bpf_stream_print_stack
Add selftests for the new bpf_stream_print_stack kfunc.

Signed-off-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260203180424.14057-3-emil@etsalapatis.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-03 10:41:16 -08:00
Emil Tsalapatis
63328bb23f bpf: Add bpf_stream_print_stack stack dumping kfunc
Add a new kfunc called bpf_stream_print_stack to be used by programs
that need to print out their current BPF stack. The kfunc is essentially
a wrapper around the existing bpf_stream_dump_stack functionality used
to generate stack traces for error events like may_goto violations and
BPF-side arena page faults.

Signed-off-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260203180424.14057-2-emil@etsalapatis.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-03 10:41:16 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
f941479a70 Merge branch 'bpf-verifier-improve-state-pruning-for-scalar-registers'
Puranjay Mohan says:

====================
bpf: Improve state pruning for scalar registers

V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260203022229.1630849-1-puranjay@kernel.org/
Changes in V3:
- Fix spelling mistakes in commit logs (AI)
- Fix an incorrect comment in the selftest added in patch 5 (AI)
- Improve the title of patch 5

V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260202104414.3103323-1-puranjay@kernel.org/
Changes in V2:
- Collected acked by Eduard
- Removed some unnecessary comments
- Added a selftest for id=0 equivalence in Patch 5

This series improves BPF verifier state pruning by relaxing scalar ID
equivalence requirements. Scalar register IDs are used to track
relationships between registers for bounds propagation. However, once
an ID becomes "singular" (only one register/stack slot carries it), it
can no longer participate in bounds propagation and becomes stale.
These stale IDs can prevent pruning of otherwise equivalent states.

The series addresses this in four patches:

Patch 1: Assign IDs on stack fills to ensure stack slots have IDs
before being read into registers, preparing for the singular ID
clearing in patch 2.

Patch 2: Clear IDs that appear only once before caching, as they cannot
contribute to bounds propagation.

Patch 3: Relax maybe_widen_reg() to only compare value-tracking fields
(bounds, tnum, var_off) rather than also requiring ID matches. Two
scalars with identical value constraints but different IDs represent
the same abstract value and don't need widening.

Patch 4: Relax scalar ID equivalence in state comparison by treating
rold->id == 0 as "independent". If the old state didn't rely on ID
relationships for a register, any linking in the current state only
adds constraints and is safe to accept for pruning.

Patch 5: Add a selftest to show the exact case being handled by Patch 4

I ran veristat on BPF programs from sched_ext, meta's internal programs,
and on selftest programs, showing programs with insn diff > 5%:

Scx Progs
File                Program              States (A)  States (B)  States (DIFF)  Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns    (DIFF)
------------------  -------------------  ----------  ----------  -------------  ---------  ---------  ---------------
scx_rusty.bpf.o     rusty_set_cpumask           320         230  -90 (-28.12%)       4478       3259  -1219 (-27.22%)
scx_bpfland.bpf.o   bpfland_select_cpu           55          49   -6 (-10.91%)        691        618    -73 (-10.56%)
scx_beerland.bpf.o  beerland_select_cpu          27          25    -2 (-7.41%)        320        295     -25 (-7.81%)
scx_p2dq.bpf.o      p2dq_init                   265         250   -15 (-5.66%)       3423       3233    -190 (-5.55%)
scx_layered.bpf.o   layered_enqueue            1461        1386   -75 (-5.13%)      14541      13792    -749 (-5.15%)

FB Progs
File          Program              States (A)  States (B)  States  (DIFF)  Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns    (DIFF)
------------  -------------------  ----------  ----------  --------------  ---------  ---------  ---------------
bpf007.bpf.o  bpfj_free                  1726        1342  -384 (-22.25%)      25671      19096  -6575 (-25.61%)
bpf041.bpf.o  armr_net_block_init       22373       20411  -1962 (-8.77%)     651697     602873  -48824 (-7.49%)
bpf227.bpf.o  layered_quiescent            28          26     -2 (-7.14%)        365        340     -25 (-6.85%)
bpf248.bpf.o  p2dq_init                   263         248    -15 (-5.70%)       3370       3159    -211 (-6.26%)
bpf254.bpf.o  p2dq_init                   263         248    -15 (-5.70%)       3388       3177    -211 (-6.23%)
bpf241.bpf.o  p2dq_init                   264         249    -15 (-5.68%)       3428       3240    -188 (-5.48%)
bpf230.bpf.o  p2dq_init                   287         271    -16 (-5.57%)       3666       3431    -235 (-6.41%)
bpf251.bpf.o  lavd_cpu_offline            321         316     -5 (-1.56%)       6221       5891    -330 (-5.30%)
bpf251.bpf.o  lavd_cpu_online             321         316     -5 (-1.56%)       6219       5889    -330 (-5.31%)

Selftest Progs
File                                Program            States (A)  States (B)  States (DIFF)  Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns    (DIFF)
----------------------------------  -----------------  ----------  ----------  -------------  ---------  ---------  ---------------
verifier_iterating_callbacks.bpf.o  test2                       4           2   -2 (-50.00%)         29         18    -11 (-37.93%)
verifier_iterating_callbacks.bpf.o  test3                       4           2   -2 (-50.00%)         31         19    -12 (-38.71%)
strobemeta_bpf_loop.bpf.o           on_event                  318         221  -97 (-30.50%)       3938       2755  -1183 (-30.04%)
bpf_qdisc_fq.bpf.o                  bpf_fq_dequeue            133         105  -28 (-21.05%)       1686       1385   -301 (-17.85%)
iters.bpf.o                         delayed_read_mark           6           5   -1 (-16.67%)         60         46    -14 (-23.33%)
arena_strsearch.bpf.o               arena_strsearch           107         106    -1 (-0.93%)       1394       1258    -136 (-9.76%)
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260203165102.2302462-1-puranjay@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-03 10:35:20 -08:00
Puranjay Mohan
f6ef5584cc selftests/bpf: Add a test for ids=0 to verifier_scalar_ids test
Test that two registers with their id=0 (unlinked) in the cached state
can be mapped to a single id (linked) in the current state.

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260203165102.2302462-6-puranjay@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-03 10:34:33 -08:00
Puranjay Mohan
b0388bafa4 bpf: Relax scalar id equivalence for state pruning
Scalar register IDs are used by the verifier to track relationships
between registers and enable bounds propagation across those
relationships. Once an ID becomes singular (i.e. only a single
register/stack slot carries it), it can no longer contribute to bounds
propagation and effectively becomes stale. The previous commit makes the
verifier clear such ids before caching the state.

When comparing the current and cached states for pruning, these stale
IDs can cause technically equivalent states to be considered different
and thus prevent pruning.

For example, in the selftest added in the next commit, two registers -
r6 and r7 are not linked to any other registers and get cached with
id=0, in the current state, they are both linked to each other with
id=A.  Before this commit, check_scalar_ids would give temporary ids to
r6 and r7 (say tid1 and tid2) and then check_ids() would map tid1->A,
and when it would see tid2->A, it would not consider these state
equivalent.

Relax scalar ID equivalence by treating rold->id == 0 as "independent":
if the old state did not rely on any ID relationships for a register,
then any ID/linking present in the current state only adds constraints
and is always safe to accept for pruning. Implement this by returning
true immediately in check_scalar_ids() when old_id == 0.

Maintain correctness for the opposite direction (old_id != 0 && cur_id
== 0) by still allocating a temporary ID for cur_id == 0. This avoids
incorrectly allowing multiple independent current registers (id==0) to
satisfy a single linked old ID during mapping.

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260203165102.2302462-5-puranjay@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-03 10:34:23 -08:00
Puranjay Mohan
a24d6f955d bpf: Relax maybe_widen_reg() constraints
The maybe_widen_reg() function widens imprecise scalar registers to
unknown when their values differ between the cached and current states.
Previously, it used regs_exact() which also compared register IDs via
check_ids(), requiring registers to have matching IDs (or mapped IDs) to
be considered exact.

For scalar widening purposes, what matters is whether the value tracking
(bounds, tnum, var_off) is the same, not whether the IDs match. Two
scalars with identical value constraints but different IDs represent the
same abstract value and don't need to be widened.

Introduce scalars_exact_for_widen() that only compares the
value-tracking portion of bpf_reg_state (fields before 'id'). This
allows the verifier to preserve more scalar value information during
state merging when IDs differ but actual tracked values are identical,
reducing unnecessary widening and potentially improving verification
precision.

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260203165102.2302462-4-puranjay@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-03 10:34:01 -08:00
Puranjay Mohan
b2a0aa3a87 bpf: Clear singular ids for scalars in is_state_visited()
The verifier assigns ids to scalar registers/stack slots when they are
linked through a mov or stack spill/fill instruction. These ids are
later used to propagate newly found bounds from one register to all
registers that share the same id. The verifier also compares the ids of
these registers in current state and cached state when making pruning
decisions.

When an ID becomes singular (i.e., only a single register or stack slot
has that ID), it can no longer participate in bounds propagation. During
comparisons between current and cached states for pruning decisions,
however, such stale IDs can prevent pruning of otherwise equivalent
states.

Find and clear all singular ids before caching a state in
is_state_visited(). struct bpf_idset which is currently unused has been
repurposed for this use case.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260203165102.2302462-3-puranjay@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-03 10:32:40 -08:00
Puranjay Mohan
3cd5c89065 bpf: Let the verifier assign ids on stack fills
The next commit will allow clearing of scalar ids if no other
register/stack slot has that id. This is because if only one register
has a unique id, it can't participate in bounds propagation and is
equivalent to having no id.

But if the id of a stack slot is cleared by clear_singular_ids() in the
next commit, reading that stack slot into a register will not establish
a link because the stack slot's id is cleared.

This can happen in a situation where a register is spilled and later
loses its id due to a multiply operation (for example) and then the
stack slot's id becomes singular and can be cleared.

Make sure that scalar stack slots have an id before we read them into a
register.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260203165102.2302462-2-puranjay@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-03 10:31:40 -08:00
Thorsten Blum
d95d76aa77 bpf: Replace snprintf("%s") with strscpy
Replace snprintf("%s") with the faster and more direct strscpy().

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260201215247.677121-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-02 18:43:33 -08:00
Jiri Olsa
6b95cc562d ftrace: Fix direct_functions leak in update_ftrace_direct_del
Alexei reported memory leak in update_ftrace_direct_del.
We miss cleanup of the replaced direct_functions in the
success path in update_ftrace_direct_del, adding that.

Fixes: 8d2c1233f3 ("ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_del function")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/aX_BxG5EJTJdCMT9@krava/T/#m7c13f5a95f862ed7ab78e905fbb678d635306a0c
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260202075849.1684369-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-02 07:56:20 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
4bebb99140 Merge branch 'bpf-arm64-add-fsession-support'
Leon Hwang says:

====================
Similar to commit 98770bd4e6 ("bpf,x86: add fsession support for x86_64"),
add fsession support on arm64.

Patch #1 adds bpf_jit_supports_fsession() to prevent fsession loading
on architectures that do not implement fsession support.

Patch #2 implements fsession support in the arm64 BPF JIT trampoline.

Patch #3 enables the relevant selftests on arm64, including get_func_ip,
and get_func_args.

All enabled tests pass on arm64:

 cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf
 ./test_progs -t fsession
 #136/1   fsession_test/fsession_test:OK
 #136/2   fsession_test/fsession_reattach:OK
 #136/3   fsession_test/fsession_cookie:OK
 #136     fsession_test:OK
 Summary: 1/3 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

 ./test_progs -t get_func
 #138     get_func_args_test:OK
 #139     get_func_ip_test:OK
 Summary: 2/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Changes:
v4 -> v5:
* Address comment from Alexei:
  * Rename helper bpf_link_prog_session_cookie() to
    bpf_prog_calls_session_cookie().
* v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260129154953.66915-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

v3 -> v4:
* Add a log when !bpf_jit_supports_fsession() in patch #1 (per AI).
* v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260129142536.48637-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

v2 -> v3:
* Fix typo in subject and patch message of patch #1 (per AI and Chris).
* Collect Acked-by, and Tested-by from Puranjay, thanks.
* v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260128150112.8873-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/

v1 -> v2:
* Add bpf_jit_supports_fsession().
* v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260127163344.92819-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260131144950.16294-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-01-31 13:51:12 -08:00
Leon Hwang
7f10da2133 selftests/bpf: Enable get_func_args and get_func_ip tests on arm64
Allow get_func_args, and get_func_ip fsession selftests to run on arm64.

Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260131144950.16294-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-01-31 13:51:04 -08:00
Leon Hwang
e3aa56b3ac bpf, arm64: Add fsession support
Implement fsession support in the arm64 BPF JIT trampoline.

Extend the trampoline stack layout to store function metadata and
session cookies, and pass the appropriate metadata to fentry and
fexit programs. This mirrors the existing x86 behavior and enables
session cookies on arm64.

Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260131144950.16294-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-01-31 13:51:04 -08:00
Leon Hwang
8798902f2b bpf: Add bpf_jit_supports_fsession()
The added fsession does not prevent running on those architectures, that
haven't added fsession support.

For example, try to run fsession tests on arm64:

test_fsession_basic:PASS:fsession_test__open_and_load 0 nsec
test_fsession_basic:PASS:fsession_attach 0 nsec
check_result:FAIL:test_run_opts err unexpected error: -14 (errno 14)

In order to prevent such errors, add bpf_jit_supports_fsession() to guard
those architectures.

Fixes: 2d419c4465 ("bpf: add fsession support")
Acked-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260131144950.16294-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-01-31 13:51:04 -08:00
Paul Chaignon
f0b5b3d6b5 selftests/bpf: Test access from RO map from xdp_store_bytes
This new test simply checks that helper bpf_xdp_store_bytes can
successfully read from a read-only map.

Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4fdb934a713b2d7cf133288c77f6cfefe9856440.1769875479.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-01-31 13:49:43 -08:00
Paul Chaignon
6557f1565d bpf: Fix bpf_xdp_store_bytes proto for read-only arg
While making some maps in Cilium read-only from the BPF side, we noticed
that the bpf_xdp_store_bytes proto is incorrect. In particular, the
verifier was throwing the following error:

  ; ret = ctx_store_bytes(ctx, l3_off + offsetof(struct iphdr, saddr),
                          &nat->address, 4, 0);
  635: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -144)     ; R1=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-144=ctx()
  636: (b4) w2 = 26                     ; R2=26
  637: (b4) w4 = 4                      ; R4=4
  638: (b4) w5 = 0                      ; R5=0
  639: (85) call bpf_xdp_store_bytes#190
  write into map forbidden, value_size=6 off=0 size=4

nat comes from a BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG map, so R3 is a PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE.
The verifier checks the helper's memory access to R3 in
check_mem_size_reg, as it reaches ARG_CONST_SIZE argument. The third
argument has expected type ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM, which includes the
MEM_WRITE flag. The verifier thus checks for a BPF_WRITE access on R3.
Given R3 points to a read-only map, the check fails.

Conversely, ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM can also lead to the helper reading
from uninitialized memory.

This patch simply fixes the expected argument type to match that of
bpf_skb_store_bytes.

Fixes: 3f364222d0 ("net: xdp: introduce bpf_xdp_pointer utility routine")
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9fa3c9f72d806e82541071c4df88b8cba28ad6a9.1769875479.git.paul.chaignon@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-01-31 13:49:43 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
cda0cbfdee Merge branch 'bpf-unify-special-map-field-validation-in-verifier'
Mykyta Yatsenko says:

====================
The BPF verifier validates pointers to special map fields (timers,
workqueues, task_work) through separate functions that share nearly
identical logic. This creates code duplication because of the
inconsistent data structure layout in struct bpf_call_arg_meta struct
bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta.

This series contains 2 commits:

1. Introduces struct bpf_map_desc to provide a unified representation
for map pointer and uid tracking. Previously, bpf_call_arg_meta used
separate map_ptr and map_uid fields while bpf_kfunc_call_arg_metaused an
anonymous inline struct. This inconsistency made it harder to share
validation code between the two paths.

2. Consolidates the validation logic for BPF_TIMER, BPF_WORKQUEUE, and
BPF_TASK_WORK field types into a single check_map_field_pointer()
function. This eliminates process_wq_func() and process_task_work_func()
entirely, and simplifies process_timer_func() to just the PREEMPT_RT
check before calling the unified validation. The result is fewer
lines of code with clearer structure for future maintenance.

Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>

Changes in v2:
- Added Signed-off-by to the top commit.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260129-verif_special_fields-v1-0-d310b7f146c8@meta.com
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260130-verif_special_fields-v2-0-2c59e637da7d@meta.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-01-30 21:13:58 -08:00
Mykyta Yatsenko
f4e72ad7c1 bpf: Consolidate special map field validation in verifier
Consolidate all logic for verifying special map fields in the single
function check_map_field_pointer().

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@meta.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260130-verif_special_fields-v2-2-2c59e637da7d@meta.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-01-30 21:13:48 -08:00