* pci/acpi-scan2:
ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() instead
ACPI: update ej_event interface to take acpi_device
ACPI / scan: Add second pass to acpi_bus_trim()
ACPI / scan: Change the implementation of acpi_bus_trim()
ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim()
ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister()
ACPI: Remove the ops field from struct acpi_device
ACPI: remove unused acpi_op_bind and acpi_op_unbind
ACPI / scan: Fix check of device_attach() return value.
* pci/yijing-ari:
PCI: shpchp: Iterate over all devices in slot, not functions 0-7
PCI: sgihp: Iterate over all devices in slot, not functions 0-7
PCI: cpcihp: Iterate over all devices in slot, not functions 0-7
PCI: pciehp: Iterate over all devices in slot, not functions 0-7
PCI: Consolidate "next-function" functions
PCI: Rename pci_enable_ari() to pci_configure_ari()
PCI: Enable ARI if dev and upstream bridge support it; disable otherwise
* 'acpi-scan' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() instead
ACPI: update ej_event interface to take acpi_device
ACPI / scan: Add second pass to acpi_bus_trim()
ACPI / scan: Change the implementation of acpi_bus_trim()
ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_trim()
ACPI / scan: Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister()
ACPI: Remove the ops field from struct acpi_device
ACPI: remove unused acpi_op_bind and acpi_op_unbind
ACPI / scan: Fix check of device_attach() return value.
Iterate through devices in a slot by using the upstream bridge's
"bus->devices" list instead of assuming they are functions 0-7. It's
possible there are several slots on the same pci_bus, so restrict it to
only devices matching this slot's device number.
ARI (which allows functions 0-255) is a PCIe-only feature, and this is
a PCI hotplug driver, so we shouldn't find anything other than functions
0-7, but it's better to iterate the same way as other hotplug drivers.
[bhelgaas: changelog, check PCI_SLOT, fix shpchp_unconfigure_device()]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Iterate through devices in a slot by using the upstream bridge's
"bus->devices" list instead of assuming they are functions 0-7. It's
possible there are several slots on the same pci_bus, so restrict it to
only devices matching this slot's device number.
ARI (which allows functions 0-255) is a PCIe-only feature, and this is
a PCI hotplug driver, so we shouldn't find anything other than functions
0-7, but it's better to iterate the same way as other hotplug drivers.
[bhelgaas: changelog, check PCI_SLOT, fix disable_slot()]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Iterate through devices in a slot by using the upstream bridge's
"bus->devices" list instead of assuming they are functions 0-7. It's
possible there are several slots on the same pci_bus, so restrict it to
only devices matching this slot's device number.
ARI (which allows functions 0-255) is a PCIe-only feature, and this is
a PCI hotplug driver, so we shouldn't find anything other than functions
0-7, but it's better to iterate the same way as other hotplug drivers.
[bhelgaas: changelog, check PCI_SLOT, fix cpci_unconfigure_slot()]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Currently, we enumerate devices in a slot with pci_scan_slot(), then
iterate through all the devices we found by looking for functions 0-7. But
that's wrong for ARI devices, which may have function numbers up to 255.
This means that when we hot-add an ARI device, pciehp only initializes
functions 0-7, and other functions don't work correctly. Additionally, if
we hot-remove the device, pciehp only removes functions 0-7, leaving stale
pci_dev structures for any other functions.
This patch fixes the problem by iterating over devices in a slot by using
the upstream bridge's "bus->devices" list instead.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
There are several next_fn functions (no_next_fn, next_trad_fn,
next_ari_fn); consolidate them in next_fn() to simplify the code.
[bhelgaas: make next_fn() static, rework control flow]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
pci_enable_ari() now supports enabling or disabling ARI forwarding. So
rename pci_enable_ari() to pci_configure_ari() for easy understanding.
No functional change.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Currently, we enable ARI in a device's upstream bridge if the bridge and
the device support it. But we never disable ARI, even if the device is
removed and replaced with a device that doesn't support ARI.
This means that if we hot-remove an ARI device and replace it with a
non-ARI multi-function device, we find only function 0 of the new device
because the upstream bridge still has ARI enabled, and next_ari_fn()
only returns function 0 for the new non-ARI device.
This patch disables ARI in the upstream bridge if the device doesn't
support ARI. See the PCIe spec, r3.0, sec 6.13.
[bhelgaas: changelog, function comment]
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the
invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is
unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called
by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next
invocations of it to do nothing.
For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use
acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it. Additionally, rearrange the
code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the
acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Should use acpi_device pointer directly instead of use handle and
get the device pointer again later.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Make acpi_bus_trim() work in analogy with acpi_bus_scan() and carry
out two passes such that ACPI drivers will be detached from device
nodes being removed in the first pass and the device nodes themselves
will be removed in the second pass.
For this purpose split the driver unregistration out of
acpi_bus_remove() into a new routine, acpi_bus_device_detach(), that
will be executed by acpi_bus_trim() in the additional first pass as
a post-order callback.
This is necessary, because some ACPI drivers' .remove() routines
unregister struct device objects associated with the ACPI device
nodes being removed and that needs to happen while the ACPI
device nodes are still around (for example, in case they need to be
used for power management or similar things at that time).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
The current acpi_bus_trim() implementation is not really
straightforward and may be simplified significantly by using
acpi_walk_namespace() with acpi_bus_remove() as a post-order
callback.
Observe that acpi_bus_remove(), as called by acpi_bus_trim(), cannot
actually fail, because its first argument is guaranteed not to be
NULL thanks to the acpi_bus_get_device() check in acpi_bus_trim(),
so simply move the acpi_bus_get_device() check to acpi_bus_remove()
and use acpi_walk_namespace() to execute it for every device under
start->handle as a post-order callback. The, run it directly for
start->handle itself.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
All callers of acpi_bus_trim() pass 1 (true) as the second argument
of it, so remove that argument entirely and change acpi_bus_trim()
to always behave as though it were 1.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Drop the second argument of acpi_device_unregister(), type, which is
not used by that function.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
The ops field in struct acpi_device is not used anywhere, so remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
With commit f2a33cde55a03 "ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind()
callbacks", acpi_op_bind and acpi_op_unbind are not used any more. So
remove them.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The ACPI handles of PCI root bridges need to be known to
acpi_bind_one(), so that it can create the appropriate
"firmware_node" and "physical_node" files for them, but currently
the way it gets to know those handles is not exactly straightforward
(to put it lightly).
This is how it works, roughly:
1. acpi_bus_scan() finds the handle of a PCI root bridge,
creates a struct acpi_device object for it and passes that
object to acpi_pci_root_add().
2. acpi_pci_root_add() creates a struct acpi_pci_root object,
populates its "device" field with its argument's address
(device->handle is the ACPI handle found in step 1).
3. The struct acpi_pci_root object created in step 2 is passed
to pci_acpi_scan_root() and used to get resources that are
passed to pci_create_root_bus().
4. pci_create_root_bus() creates a struct pci_host_bridge object
and passes its "dev" member to device_register().
5. platform_notify(), which for systems with ACPI is set to
acpi_platform_notify(), is called.
So far, so good. Now it starts to be "interesting".
6. acpi_find_bridge_device() is used to find the ACPI handle of
the given device (which is the PCI root bridge) and executes
acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(), among other things, for the
given device object.
7. acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() uses the name (sic!) of the given
device object to extract the segment and bus numbers of the PCI
root bridge and passes them to acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle().
8. acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() browses the list of ACPI PCI
root bridges and finds the one that matches the given segment
and bus numbers. Its handle is then used to initialize the
ACPI handle of the PCI root bridge's device object by
acpi_bind_one(). However, this is *exactly* the ACPI handle we
started with in step 1.
Needless to say, this is quite embarassing, but it may be avoided
thanks to commit f3fd0c8 (ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be
initialized in advance), which makes it possible to initialize the
ACPI handle of a device before passing it to device_register().
Accordingly, add a new __weak routine, pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(),
defaulting to an empty implementation that can be replaced by the
interested architecutres (x86 and ia64 at the moment) with functions
that will set the root bridge's ACPI handle before its dev member is
passed to device_register(). Make both x86 and ia64 provide such
implementations of pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() and remove
acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() and acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() that
aren't necessary any more.
Included is a fix for breakage on systems with non-ACPI PCI host
bridges from Bjorn Helgaas.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Since device_attach() returns 1 on success (a driver has been bound
to the device), the check against its return value in
acpi_bus_device_attach() should modified to take that into accout.
Make it so.
[rjw: Subject and changelog.]
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* pci/yinghai-survey-resources+acpi-scan:
ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way
ACPI: Remove unused struct acpi_pci_root.id member
ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind() callbacks
ACPI / PCI: Move the _PRT setup and cleanup code to pci-acpi.c
ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup
ACPI: Add .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks to struct acpi_bus_type
ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument
ACPI: Replace ACPI device add_type field with a match_driver flag
ACPI: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_scan()
ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used
ACPI: Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
ACPI / PCI: Fold acpi_pci_root_start() into acpi_pci_root_add()
ACPI: Change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add()
ACPI: Replace struct acpi_bus_ops with enum type
ACPI: Reduce the usage of struct acpi_bus_ops
ACPI: Make acpi_bus_add() and acpi_bus_start() visibly different
ACPI: Change the ordering of PCI root bridge driver registrarion
ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from probing ACPI drivers
* 'acpi-scan' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
ACPI / scan: Treat power resources in a special way
ACPI: Remove unused struct acpi_pci_root.id member
ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind() callbacks
ACPI / PCI: Move the _PRT setup and cleanup code to pci-acpi.c
ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup
ACPI: Add .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks to struct acpi_bus_type
ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument
ACPI: Replace ACPI device add_type field with a match_driver flag
ACPI: Drop the second argument of acpi_bus_scan()
ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used
ACPI: Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
ACPI / PCI: Fold acpi_pci_root_start() into acpi_pci_root_add()
ACPI: Change the ordering of acpi_bus_check_add()
ACPI: Replace struct acpi_bus_ops with enum type
ACPI: Reduce the usage of struct acpi_bus_ops
ACPI: Make acpi_bus_add() and acpi_bus_start() visibly different
ACPI: Change the ordering of PCI root bridge driver registrarion
ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from probing ACPI drivers
Conflicts:
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
During testing remove/rescan root bus 00, found
[ 338.142574] bus: 'pci': really_probe: probing driver ata_piix with device 0000:00:01.1
[ 338.146788] ata_piix 0000:00:01.1: device not available (can't reserve [io 0x01f0-0x01f7])
[ 338.150565] ata_piix: probe of 0000:00:01.1 failed with error -22
because that fixed resource is not claimed.
For bootint path it is claimed in from
arch/x86/pci/i386.c::pcibios_allocate_resources()
Claim those resources, so on the remove/rescan will still use old
resources.
It is some kind honoring FW setting in the registers during hot add.
esp root-bus hot add is through acpi, BIOS has chance to set some registers
before handing over.
[bhelgaas: move weak definition to patch that uses it]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Firmware may have assigned PCI BARs for hot-added devices, so reserve
those resources before trying to allocate more.
[bhelgaas: move empty weak definition here]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
The PCI resource allocation functions will be used for hot-added
devices, so keep them around.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
The BIOS doesn't assign BAR values for hot-added devices, so don't
bother saving the original values when we enumerate these devices.
[bhelgaas: changelog, return constant 0 in pcibios_retrieve_fw_addr]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Factor pcibios_allocate_rom_resources() and
pcibios_allocate_dev_rom_resource() out of pcibios_assign_resources().
This will allow us to allocate ROM resources for hot-added root buses.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Previously pcibios_allocate_resources() allocated resources at boot-time
for all PCI devices using for_each_pci_dev(). This patch changes
pcibios_allocate_resources() so we can specify a bus, so we can do
similar allocation when hot-adding a root bus.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Factor pcibios_allocate_dev_resources() out of
pcibios_allocate_resources(). Currently we only allocate these
resources at boot-time with a for_each_pci_dev() loop. Eventually
we'll use pcibios_allocate_dev_resources() for hot-added devices, too.
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Commit 805d410 (ACPI: Separate adding ACPI device objects from
probing ACPI drivers) introduced an ACPI power resources management
regression, because it didn't ensure that the power resources
driver bind to the struct acpi_device objects corresponding
to power resources as soon as they were created. As a result,
ACPI power management routines may attempt to access power resource
objects before they are ready to use.
To fix this problem, tell the acpi_add_single_object() in
acpi_bus_check_add() to probe the driver for objects of type
ACPI_BUS_TYPE_POWER. This fix has been verified to work on
HP nx6325 where the problem was first observed.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Thus pcibios_allocate_bus_resources() could more simple and clean.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
__pci_enable_device_flags() takes values like IORESOURCE_IO and
IORESOURCE_MEM, which are values for struct resource.flags, which is
"unsigned long", not "resource_size_t".
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
This member is never initialized and never referenced, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Drop the .bind() and .unbind() that have no more users from
struct acpi_device_ops and remove all of the code referring to
them from drivers/acpi/scan.c.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Move the code related to _PRT setup and removal and to power
resources from acpi_pci_bind() and acpi_pci_unbind() to the .setup()
and .cleanup() callbacks in acpi_pci_bus and remove acpi_pci_bind()
and acpi_pci_unbind() that have no purpose any more. Accordingly,
remove the code related to device .bind() and .unbind() operations
from the ACPI PCI root bridge driver.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Currently, the ACPI wakeup capability of PCI devices is set up
in two different places, partially in acpi_pci_bind() where
runtime wakeup is initialized and partially in
platform_pci_wakeup_init(), where system wakeup is initialized.
The cleanup is only done in acpi_pci_unbind() and it only covers
runtime wakeup.
Use the new .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks in struct acpi_bus_type
to consolidate that code and do the setup and the cleanup each in one
place.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Add two new callbacks,.setup() and .cleanup(), struct acpi_bus_type
and modify acpi_platform_notify() to call .setup() after executing
acpi_bind_one() successfully and acpi_platform_notify_remove() to
call .cleanup() before running acpi_unbind_one(). This will allow
the users of struct acpi_bus_type, PCI in particular, to specify
operations to be executed right after the given device has been
associated with a companion struct acpi_device and right before
it's going to be detached from that companion, respectively.
The main motivation is to be able to get rid of acpi_pci_bind()
and acpi_pci_unbind(), which are horrible horrible stuff. [In short,
there are three problems with them: The way they populate the .bind()
and .unbind() callbacks of ACPI devices is rather less than
straightforward, they require special hotplug-specific paths to be
present in the ACPI namespace scanning code and by the time
acpi_pci_unbind() is called the PCI device object in question may
not exist any more.]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has
succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to
the handle passed as the first argument. Unfortunately, however,
this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add()
too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct
acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to
one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that
handle).
For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about
whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for
its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device()
anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really
useful for them. The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan()
executed directly from acpi_scan_init().
Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the
existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of
acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second
argument of acpi_bus_add(). Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to
use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer
needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
After the removal of the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() there is
no difference between the ACPI_BUS_ADD_MATCH and ACPI_BUS_ADD_START
add types, so the add_type field in struct acpi_device may be
replaced with a single flag. Do that calling the flag match_driver.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
After the removal of acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start()
the second argument of acpi_bus_scan() is not necessary any more,
so drop it and update acpi_bus_check_add() accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and
redefine its header to match the body. Update all of its callers as
necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed
lines of code (Linus will like that).
Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how
its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make
note to self to take care of that later).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
The ACPI PCI root bridge driver was the only ACPI driver implementing
the .start() callback, which isn't used by any ACPI drivers any more
now.
For this reason, acpi_start_single_object() has no purpose any more,
so remove it and all references to it. Also remove
acpi_bus_start_device(), whose only purpose was to call
acpi_start_single_object().
Moreover, since after the removal of acpi_bus_start_device() the
only purpose of acpi_bus_start() remains to call
acpi_update_all_gpes(), move that into acpi_bus_add() and drop
acpi_bus_start() too, remove its header from acpi_bus.h and
update all of its former users accordingly.
This change was previously proposed in a different from by
Yinghai Lu.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
