Drop C20 25.175 MHz PLL table as with these
PLL dividers the port clock will be incorrectly
calculated to 25.2 MHz. For 25.175 MHz rate the
PLl dividers are calculated algorithmically making
PLL table for this rate redundant.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119093757.2850233-14-mika.kahola@intel.com
Add verification for lt phy pll dividers during boot. The port clock
is calculated from pll dividers and compared against the requested
port clock value. If there are a difference exceeding +-1 kHz an
drm_warn() is thrown out to indicate possible pll divider mismatch.
v2:
- Move the LT_PHY_PLL_PARAMS -> LT_PHY_PLL_DP/HDMI_PARAMS change
earlier.
- Use tables[i].name != NULL as a terminating condition.
- Use state vs. params term consistently in intel_c10pll_verify_clock()
and intel_c20pll_verify_clock().
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119093757.2850233-13-mika.kahola@intel.com
Add verification for pll table dividers. The port clock
is computed based on pll tables and, for hdmi case, the
algorithmic model is applied to calculate pll dividers.
If port clock differs more than +-1 kHz from expected value
an drm_warn() is thrown and pll divider differences are
printed out for debugging purposes.
v2:
- Move clock derivation from dividers in intel_cx0pll_enable()
earlier in the patchset.
- Keep intel_cx0_pll_power_save_wa() in intel_dpll_sanitize_state()
- Use tables[i].name != NULL as a terminating condition.
- Drop duplicate intel_cx0pll_clock_matches() declaration in header.
- Use state vs. params term consistently in intel_c10pll_verify_clock()
and intel_c20pll_verify_clock().
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119093757.2850233-12-mika.kahola@intel.com
Since the clock rate is derived from the PLL divider values it can have
a +-1kHz difference wrt. the reference rates in the comparison
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119093757.2850233-11-mika.kahola@intel.com
The hard coded clock rate stored in the PLL state will be removed by
a follow-up change. The clock is calculated instead of
using clock from the PLL divider values. Since this calculated clock
may vary due to fixed point rounding issues, a +-1 kHz variation is
allowed with the request clock rate against the calculated clock rate.
v2:
- Use the stricter +-1 kHz allowed difference.
- Derive the clock from PLL dividers in intel_cx0pll_enable().
- Move corresponding fuzzy check for LT PHY PLLs to this patch.
v3: Reword commit message (Suraj)
Move clock check to intel_dpll and rename it (Suraj)
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119093757.2850233-9-mika.kahola@intel.com
Create a macro for PLL state for LT PHY similar as
for cx0 case.
v2:
- Move addition of LT_PHY_PLL_DP/HDMI_PARAMS() to this patch.
- Fix end of table checking while looking up a table.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119093757.2850233-8-mika.kahola@intel.com
Create macro for storing PLL dividers with table name
and clock rate.
v2: Preserve the terminating {} in each PLL table.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119093757.2850233-7-mika.kahola@intel.com
For C10 and C20 we have unused encoder parameter passed
to port clock calculation function. Remove the encoder from
being passed to the port clock calculation function.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119093757.2850233-6-mika.kahola@intel.com
Drop crtc_state from intel_lt_phy_calc_port_clock() function call
and replace it with pll state instead. Follow-up changes will
call these functions without a crtc_state available.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119093757.2850233-5-mika.kahola@intel.com
Drop crtc_state from HDMI TMDS calculation and replace with the
parameters that are only required. Follow-up changes will call
these functions without a crtc_state available.
v2: Keep required crtc_state param for intel_c20_pll_tables_get()
and other functions calling this one.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119093757.2850233-4-mika.kahola@intel.com
Prepare removal of .clock member from the pll state
structure by moving intel_c20pll_calc_port_clock()
function.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119093757.2850233-3-mika.kahola@intel.com
Prepare removal of .clock member from pll state
structures by moving intel_c10pll_calc_port_clock()
function.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260119093757.2850233-2-mika.kahola@intel.com
Add VBT support to enable/disable eDP Pipe Joiner feature.
The OEMs can choose to enable/disable the feature from VBT.
ARL - VBTs default this field to disabled.
PTL+ - VBTs default this field to enabled.
Bspec:20142
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260108124141.1407760-2-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
With some panels informing support for Panel Replay we are observing
problems if having Panel Replay enable bit set on sink when forced to use
PSR instead of Panel Replay. Avoid these problems by not setting Panel
Replay enable bit in sink when Panel Replay is globally disabled during
link training. I.e. disabled by module parameter.
The enable bit is still set when disabling Panel Replay via debugfs
interface. Added note comment about this.
Fixes: 68f3a505b3 ("drm/i915/psr: Enable Panel Replay on sink always when it's supported")
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.15+
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260115070039.368965-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Simplify things by computing the detailed slice configuration using
intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_config(), instead of open-coding the same.
While at it add a TODO comment to intel_dp_dsc_compute_config() to
explore if it's worth increasing the number of VDSC stream engines used,
in order to reduce the minimum CDCLK required.
v2: Add a TODO comment to intel_dp_dsc_compute_config() to explore if
it's worth increasing the number of slices in order to use a lower
CDCLK. (Jouni)
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-16-imre.deak@intel.com
Add intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_config() to compute the detailed slice
configuration and determine the slices-per-line value (returned by
intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count()) using this function.
v2: Fix incorrectly returning false from intel_dp_dsc_min_slice_count()
due to rebase fail. (Jouni)
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-15-imre.deak@intel.com
Unify the DP and eDP slices-per-line computation. Atm eDP simply returns
the maximum slices-per-line value supported by the sink, but using the
same helper function for both cases still makes sense, since a follow-up
change will compute the detailed slice config for both cases.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-14-imre.deak@intel.com
Use intel_dsc_get_slice_config() for DSI to compute the slice
configuration based on the slices-per-line sink capability, instead of
open-coding the same.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-13-imre.deak@intel.com
Add intel_dsc_get_slice_config() and move the logic to select a given
slice configuration to that function from the configuration loop in
intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(). The same functionality can be used by
other outputs like DSI as well, done as a follow-up.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-12-imre.deak@intel.com
Simplify the slice config loop in intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(), using
the loop iterator as the slices-per-pipe value directly, instead of
looking up the same value from an array.
While at it move the code comment about the slice configuration closer
to where the configuration is determined and clarify it a bit.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-11-imre.deak@intel.com
There is no reason to use the more specific u8 type for slice count
variables, use the more generic int type instead.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-9-imre.deak@intel.com
Factor out intel_dp_dsc_min_slice_count() for making
intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count() more readable and also to prepare for a
follow-up change unifying the eDP and DP slice count/config computation.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-8-imre.deak@intel.com
By now all the places are updated to track the DSC slice configuration
in intel_crtc_state::dsc.slice_config, so calculate the slices-per-line
value using that config, instead of using
intel_crtc_state::dsc.slice_count caching the same value and remove
the cached slice_count.
v2: Rebase on latest drm-tip, converting another user of dsc.slice_count
in intel_vdsc_min_cdclk().
Cc: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> # v1
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-7-imre.deak@intel.com
Add tracking for the DP DSC pipes-per-line and slices-per-stream value
in the slice config state and compute the current slices-per-line
(slice_count) value using this slice config. The slices-per-line value
used atm will be removed by a follow-up change after converting all the
places using it to use the slice config instead.
For now the slices-per-stream value is calculated based on the
slices-per-line value (slice_count) calculated by the
drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_count() / intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count()
functions. In a follow-up change these functions will be converted to
calculate the slices-per-stream value directly, along with the detailed
slice configuration.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-6-imre.deak@intel.com
Add tracking for the DSI DSC pipes-per-line and slices-per-stream value
in the slice config state and compute the current slices-per-line value
using this slice config state. The slices-per-line value used atm will
be removed by a follow-up change after converting all the places using
it to use the detailed slice config instead.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-5-imre.deak@intel.com
Move the initialization of the DSI DSC streams-per-pipe value to
fill_dsc() next to where the corresponding (per-line) slice_count value
is initialized. This allows converting the initialization to use the
detailed slice configuration state in follow-up changes.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-4-imre.deak@intel.com
Move the tracking for the DSC stream count from
intel_crtc_state::dsc.num_streams to
intel_crtc_state::dsc.slice_config.streams_per_pipe.
While at it add a TODO comment to read out the full DSC configuration
from HW including the pipes-per-line and slices-per-stream values.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-3-imre.deak@intel.com
Add a way to track the detailed DSC pipes-per-line, streams-per-pipe,
slices-per-stream configuration instead of the current streams-per-pipe
and slices-per-line value. This way describes the slice configuration in
a clearer way, for instance providing a
2 pipes-per-line x 2 streams-per-pipe x 2 slices-per-stream = 8 slices-per-line
view, instead of the current, coarser
2 streams-per-pipe, 8 slices-per-line
view, the former better reflecting that each DSC stream engine has 2
slices. This also let's optimizing the configuration in a
simpler/clearer way, for instance using 1 stream x 2 slices, or 1 stream
x 4 slices instead of the current 2 stream x 1 slice, or 2 streams x 2
slices configuration (so that 1 DSC stream engine can be powered off in
each pipe).
Follow-up changes will convert the current slices-per-line computation
logic to compute instead the above detailed slice configuration.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260114162232.92731-2-imre.deak@intel.com
The minimum/maximum DSC input (i.e. pipe) and compressed (i.e. link) BPP
limits are computed already in intel_dp_compute_config_limits(), so
there is no need to do this again in
mst_stream_dsc_compute_link_config() called later. Remove the
corresponding alignments from the latter function and use the
precomputed (aligned and within bounds) maximum pipe BPP and the min/max
compressed BPP values instead as-is.
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-21-imre.deak@intel.com
intel_edp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp() matches now
intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(), remove the former function.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-20-imre.deak@intel.com
Move computing the eDP compressed BPP value to the function computing
this for DP, allowing further simplifications later.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-19-imre.deak@intel.com
If dsc_compute_compressed_bpp() failed with a forced pipe BPP value
(where the forced pipe BPP value itself is valid within the min/max pipe
BPP limits), the function will also fail when called with the maximum
pipe BPP value: dsc_compute_compressed_bpp() will try all compressed
BPPs below the passed in pipe BPP value and if the function failed with
a given (low) compressed BPP value it will also fail with a compressed
BPP value higher than the one which failed already.
Based on the above remove the logic to retry computing a compressed BPP
value with the maximum pipe BPP value if computing the compressed BPP
failed already with the (lower) forced pipe BPP value.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-18-imre.deak@intel.com
The maximum pipe BPP value (used as the DSC input BPP) has been aligned
already to the corresponding source/sink input BPP capabilities in
intel_dp_compute_config_limits(). So it isn't needed to perform the same
alignment again in intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp() called later, this
function can simply use the already aligned maximum pipe BPP value, do
that.
Also, there is no point in trying pipe BPP values lower than the
maximum: this would only make dsc_compute_compressed_bpp() start with a
lower _compressed_ BPP value, but this lower compressed BPP value has
been tried already when dsc_compute_compressed_bpp() was called with the
higher pipe BPP value (i.e. the first dsc_compute_compressed_bpp() call
tries already all the possible compressed BPP values which are all below
the pipe BPP value passed to it). Simplify the function accordingly
trying only the maximum pipe BPP value.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-17-imre.deak@intel.com
The maximum pipe BPP value (used as the DSC input BPP) has been aligned
already to the corresponding source/sink input BPP capabilities in
intel_dp_compute_config_limits(). So it isn't needed to perform the same
alignment again in intel_edp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp() called later, this
function can simply use the already aligned maximum pipe BPP value, do
that.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-16-imre.deak@intel.com
The minimum/maximum compressed BPP values are aligned/bounded in
intel_dp_compute_link_bpp_limits() to the corresponding source limits.
The minimum compressed BPP value doesn't change afterwards, so no need
to align it again, remove that.
The maximum compressed BPP, which depends on the pipe BPP value still
needs to be aligned, since the pipe BPP value could change after the
above limits were computed, via intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(). Use the
corresponding helper for this alignment instead of open-coding the same.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-15-imre.deak@intel.com
Atm, a DP DSC video mode's required BW vs. the available BW is
determined by calculating the maximum compressed BPP value allowed by
the available BW. Doing that using a closed-form formula as it's done
atm (vs. an iterative way) is problematic, since the overhead of the
required BW itself depends on the BPP value being calculated. Instead of
that calculate the required BW for the minimum compressed BPP value
supported both by the source and the sink and check this BW against the
available BW. This change also aligns the BW calculation during mode
validation with how this is done during state computation, calculating
the required effective data rate with the corresponding BW overhead.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-14-imre.deak@intel.com
Add intel_dp_mode_valid_with_dsc() and call this for an SST/MST mode
validation to prepare for a follow-up change using a way to verify the
mode's required BW the same way this is done elsewhere during state
computation (which in turn depends on the mode's effective data rate
with the corresponding BW overhead).
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-13-imre.deak@intel.com
Factor out compute_max_compressed_bpp_x16() also used during mode
validation in a follow-up change.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-12-imre.deak@intel.com
Factor out compute_min_compressed_bpp_x16() also used during mode
validation in a follow-up change.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-11-imre.deak@intel.com
Prepare for follow-up changes using dsc_throughput_quirk_max_bpp_x16()
without an intel_crtc_state pointer.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-10-imre.deak@intel.com
Prepare for follow-up changes also calling
intel_dp_dsc_min_sink_compressed_bpp() /
intel_dp_dsc_max_sink_compressed_bpp_x16()
without an intel_crtc_state.
While at it remove the stale function declarations from the header file.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-9-imre.deak@intel.com
The intel_dp pointer can be deducted from the connector pointer, so it's
enough to pass only connector to
intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits(), do so.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-8-imre.deak@intel.com
Align the minimum/maximum DSC compressed BPPs to the corresponding
source compressed BPP limits already when computing the BPP limits. This
alignment is also performed later during state computation, however
there is no reason to initialize the limits to an unaligned/incorrect
value.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-7-imre.deak@intel.com
Align the minimum/maximum DSC input BPPs to the corresponding sink DSC
input BPP capability limits already when computing the BPP limits. This
alignment is also performed later during state computation, however
there is no reason to initialize the limits to an unaligned/incorrect
value.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-6-imre.deak@intel.com
Factor out align_max_vesa_compressed_bpp_x16(), also used later for
computing the maximum DSC compressed BPP limit.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-5-imre.deak@intel.com
Factor out align_max_sink_dsc_input_bpp(), also used later for computing
the maximum DSC input BPP limit.
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222153547.713360-4-imre.deak@intel.com
